Petition Asks Obama To Support Treaty For The Blind, Rather Than Siding With Hollywood
from the where-do-you-stand dept
During the course of President Obama's administration, he has gone back and forth over support for the WIPO treaty for the blind, which would make it easier for vision impaired people to get copies of books that they can read (allowing legally made copies to be shared across borders). It's a pretty simple proposition, and while the White House had announced support for the agreement back in 2009, the people who were responsible for that position were later replaced by content industry folks, who suddenly changed the administration's position on the treaty. Since then, the administration has been responsible for blocking the treaty from getting done. And, of course, we've seen the MPAA celebrate this lack of a treaty, because it sees any attempt to negotiate a treaty that includes "exceptions" to copyright (i.e., rights of the public) expanded as a problem.With the next round of negotiations set to take place soon in Morocco, a "We the People" petition has been set up to ask President Obama to side with the blind, rather than the MPAA.
Less than 1% of printed works globally are accessible to the blind. This is because laws around the world bar printed material from being turned into formats useable by the blind and visually impaired, or for such material to be shared across borders.It may be difficult to get to 100,000 signatures, but We The People petitions have previously been successful in getting the administration to come out against SOPA and against the Library of Congress' decision to say that unlocking mobile phones is a form of copyright infringement.
That’s why 186 countries will soon convene in Morocco to finalize a Treaty that would empower the world’s nearly 300 million blind citizens with the same rights to read, learn, and earn that the sighted enjoy. However, huge and powerful corporations – many wholly unaffected by the proposed Treaty – are working to fatally weaken it or block its adoption.
Ask the President to compel US negotiators to fight for a strong Treaty that gives blind people equal access to books and doesn't burden those who want to provide them. Please sign today!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blind, copyright, petition, president obama
Companies: mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Signed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
Classy. Real classy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
OotB hates everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!
As usual, "the thieving rich" are exempted from criticism for locking cultural artifacts away from the public domain, restricting it to those who have no visual impairment, or denying artists fair compensation for their work via work-for-hire clauses in their contracts because copyright is awesome or something.
For the umpteenth time, Blue 2, copyright rent collection does not guarantee artists an income because "the thieving rich" usually own it!
BTW I'm not on the "thieving rich" bandwagon. I'm just bashing Blue 2's stance here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kickstarter project instead of a petition...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The exact same could be said of you ootb. You come in here with what appears to be a love/hate relation with Mike. You have consistently shown you don't read the articles before commenting, rarely read the comments to respond, rarely comment on topic, have no earthly idea what you rave of and can not support anything you say with reasonable references.
You sir, could be defined by a quote spoken of in reflection of George Bush. I give you that quote here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Against
Period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Against
So the introduction of laws/exceptions like this isn't giving them any 'extra' rights, it's just evening the playing field with those that can see fine and don't need those 'extra' exceptions to the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
not "because it sees any attempt to negotiate a treaty that includes "exceptions" to copyright (i.e., rights of the public) expanded."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.mpaa.org/about/contact
Why not contact them and ask them why they hate blind people so much?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Treat for the Blind - Sign the Petition
Its easy to signup and sign. Follow the link to the White House.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]