President Obama Is 'Troubled' About Chilling Effects His Own Administration Is Causing To Journalism?
from the really-now? dept
Well, this is rich. During his talk on Thursday, much of which focused on terrorism and drones, President Obama admitted that he's asked Eric Holder to review the DOJ's process for investigating leaks that involve getting information from journalists:President Obama said Thursday that he is “troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable.”While it's great that he's "troubled," it's not a "possibility" that this is chilling investigative journalism, it's a confirmed fact. Not only that, but many believe that this was actually part of the goal all along. There's been no evidence of any interest in "balance." There has, instead, been what is clearly a concerted effort to intimidate whistleblowers and the press that investigates the federal government. The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act against more cases of whistleblowing to the press than all other Presidents combined. That's not about "striking the right balance."
In a major speech on national security, Obama said that the “Justice Department’s investigation of national security leaks offers a recent example of the challenges involved in striking the right balance between our security and our open society.”
Obama said that “journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs," but that the "focus must be on those who break the law."Oh really? Then why did your own DOJ claim that a journalist was an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator for reporting on a leak -- just like tons of other reporters?
President Obama sounds like someone campaigning against his own policies. Either Eric Holder and the DOJ have "gone rogue" or the President is hastily pretending that his administration is not doing what it clearly has been doing for years.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: barack obama, chilling effects, eric holder, journalism, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Correct with a slight change...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Media should be going full out Assult... they won't
- Benghazi -
Lame non-scandal, even if the President initially misled for whatever reason.
- IRS -
Democrats actual political targeting of opposition, using IRS..... scandal and abuse of power. NO PROOF OF THAT.
IRS going after groups with political sounding names..... No scandal.
Ignore this, Ignore this, Ignore this, Ignore, Ignore, Ignore
These groups are designed to funnel money to politicians from "anonymous"(to the public) "donors".
Nothing wrong with that, IGNORE FFS
it's political targeting and there is no proof to prove it. Must be true then. No proof = true theory.
- Spying -
They do it on "normal people" and have been since the patriot act.
Cry more, "journalists". Your sympathy for the people didn't exist when they spied on us. But now they came for you.
The media will stay on script.
■ IRS "scandal" has nothing to do with funneling money to a corrupt government system.
■ "Spying" has nothing to do with corrupted government practices and removal of everyone's freedoms.
■ Benghazi is relevant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Media should be going full out Assult... they won't
It's painfully obvious that the Espionage Act was put in place as a means to intimidate reporters; the "leaked" info that AP reporters were being spied upon was done with likewise intent. The government is looking to create a chilling effect so that it can get away with doing anything it wants behind the veil of secrecy, without fear of reprisal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We will still spy on the public as usual.
We will still spy on journalists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Russian saying
"The Tsar is good, he just has bad advisers!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Russian saying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chilling...
Adolf Hitler - 1933
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Chilling...
Also... that quote applies more to Bush after 9/11 when the "patriot act" was invented.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Chilling...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am not a butthurt Democrat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Chilling...
Second point, not that I agree with the patriot act at all because I don't, but Obama is no better, he supported it's renewal and did you not read in this very article? so Obama is just as bad, if not worse when it comes to protecting our liberties.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems Legit !
I agree that Obama is just as bad, if not worse than Bush on Civil Liberties, Privacy, Human rights etc...
I shouldn't have to say it every time I criticize one or the other.
I am not "Fair and Balanced"
Life is not "Fair and Balanced"
The whole Idea that I have to criticize one IF I criticize the other is complete bullshit.
I hate both sides equally on most issues.
On some issues I hate one side more.
The absence of criticizing Obama in my original comment does in NO WAY infer my support, ignorance or denial of his actions.
That* is what you made up in your head. I didn't even imply it in the slightest.
Comprehension skills are severely lacking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You don't have to say anything, about one or the other, but if you don't tell the whole story you should not get upset if someone 'fleshes out the facts'.
I made nothing up about you. You started talking about Bush (not the subject of the article), I simply followed your comments up in context of this article. If that upsets you that is your problem, not mine.
There is nothing lacking in my comprehension skills, but since your an AC it is kind of hard to tell you all apart as you all look alike.
If you don't like being challenged or corrected, perhaps one should not make posts. Just a thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Chilling...
"Obama signs NDAA 2013 without objecting to indefinite detention of Americans"
You are part of the problem, living in the past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Butthurt partisans everywhere
I say that Hitler Quotes being used to describe Obama is retarded. The specific quote would fit Bush better. Therefore I must be an Obama supporter who is blind to the shit he does. And living in the past.
Wrong moron. LRN2Comprehend
WE ARE ALL LIVING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PAST
Shit Bush implemented IS bad.
Shit Obama implemented IS bad.
That "shit" IS , not "was"(as in the past)... That shit IS bad.
While the shit Bush implemented IS in existence.... he can be blamed for it. (same goes for Obama)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
on the topic of hitler quotes
IF we are going to apply Hitler quotes to a political side in America... Who do you think seems more Hitler-ish ?
The "right wing Hitler" quotes seem sorta right wing'y to me.
inb4 some wrongly use inference to conclude I am a blind left winger.
It's not a two sided, black/white thing. Something Hitler knew and used as propaganda to make people believe it was a two sided issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Butthurt partisans everywhere
I was replying to the AC that posted:
Re: Re: Chilling...
The same patriot act that Obama is gleefully using today?
NOT your stupid Hitler quote, moron...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YEP.. confirmed: Butthurt partisans everywhere
I posted Re: Chilling...
You posted Re: Re: Chilling...
You replied to ME.
If you did reply to who you claim... it would have read "Re: Re: Re: Chilling..."
Also the thread lines don't match up to your claim.
Even if you didn't reply to me.... which you clearly did. It still applies.
WE ARE ALL LIVING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PAST.
Also the Hitler comment is not only relevant, it is far from stupid.
Comparing Obama to Hitler is classic butthurt right wing propaganda that is in no way accurate.
I even went on to explain that if you were to compare Hitler quotes to an American political party, it would be the Republicans that the quotes fit the most.
Fucking stupid to compare Republicans with Hitler too.
Moron is correct.
You decide who it is. Me or you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Warm and cuddly feeling...
Someone, somewhere and who absolutely had nothing to do with this will be found to be the rogue agent.
And I'll be sure to post as a coward from now on since I have no fear that the IRS, EPA, FBI or OSHA may be used to silence critics of this administration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are all the same, they will promise whatever it takes to get elected and then they proceed to break every one of their promises made to the public.
Politics is corrupt and rotten to the core.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
troubled
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: troubled
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: troubled
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: troubled
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now Obama tries to push a domestic agenda,( which has been pretty much thwarted,) and not to appear weak befor his political opponents he continues Bush's spy war.
The supervision of these government agencies have been left on auto-pilot for way to long. and now Obama who is into his second term realises only now much of america's principles have been sacrificed in ths spend-thrift war on terror.
as a guy that promised Not to be bush, Obama, will, when he looks back at his time in office will disapointed when he realises he left bush's mistakes in place. and
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When the only candidates that have a chance of getting elected are Satan and Sauron, what does that say about the state of your nation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem of whistle blowing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obama says he can kill Mike or YOU with a drone,
The real target of foreign wars against "shadowy" enemies is YOUR civil liberties. You are not going to remain free after the whole gov't has become a killing machine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama says he can kill Mike or YOU with a drone,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama says he can kill Mike or YOU with a drone,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama says he can kill Mike or YOU with a drone,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When a "party" is put in the WH, it gets to pick it's Atty Gen/DOJ players.
Thus, outrage of a DOJ that has the power to tap my phone without a warrant, tap 1st Amendment Protected reports, monitor this post & put me in jail for their reasons MUST go straight to the President's desk (R or D) for hiring the people who carry out such activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now, whether there was even a worthy candidate on the ballot is another matter entirely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I feel sorry for the ones that didn't...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
“Obama Signs NDAA 2013 Without Objecting To Indefinite Detention” -RT
http://rt.com/usa/obama-ndaa-detention-president-288/
“Some Unions Now Angry About Health Care Overhaul” - Yahoo
http://news.yahoo.com/unions-now-angry-health-care-overhaul-074904729.html
“DOJ And Dept. Of Education To Colleges: Start Restricting Free Speech On Campus Or Kiss Your Federal Funding Goodbye” -TechDirt
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-star t- restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml
”Secret 'Kill List' Tests Obama's Principles” - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagew anted=all&_r=0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many among those of us kinda knew.
We knew. But we also realized that Romney was worse.
I expect Romney would do all the shit that Obama does, maybe even more (following in George W. Bush's footsteps) and then would push a hard-right morality agenda as well.
The Soviet Union had a one party system. We have, essentially, a one party system with a ridiculous and appalling opposition party to create the illusion of having a choice.
Ultimately, who ever gets into office is going to pull the same corrupt crap while distracting us with wedge issues to make it seem like they're doing their job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vicious Circle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Politics...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
anyway once he selected palin as his vice, it shook any confidence I had in that candidate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's galling to me...
We already have a guideline in the U.S. It's called the First Amendment.
What they're label as secret these days is doubly absurd.
It is no secret that every human has the same capacity for egregious error and moral turpitude. It has nothing to do with national security.
Opinion polls have nothing to do with national security.
Accountability as applied to our leaders has nothing to do with national security... with the exception of the fact that if we make accountability an impossibility, there is no national security.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obama a master doublethinker
Two definition of doublethink from Wikipedia and 1984:
“ To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself – that was the ultimate subtlety; consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink. ”
“ The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies – all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth ”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The looters are winning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess they decided China was right all along.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
impeech him
"I'm troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable."
He's only troubled that it bothers the journalists? he doesn't say that he is troubled it happened just that hes trouble by how they feel about what has happened. This guy needs to be impeeched. There is no way he is protecting our constitution!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not just more...
In one term. We still have another term to go! Can he go for twelve?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not just more...
Prosecutions, or terms? Because the 22nd Amendment is just one more item on the list of Constitutional rights, provisions, and protections that he intends to ignore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, Barack Obama is the president. That does not make him omniscient or omnipotent. He is nominally the boss of about a zillion people. It is totally unfair to expect him to be aware of and responsible for the actions of every single one of his subordinates. Subordinates who are often gigantic agencies with their own strong personalities and agendas and organizational inertia.
So his being troubled about something is a good first step toward maybe fixing the problem. Even if he does want it fixed, he is probably going to try to figure out how to do that without burning too much political capital and burning too many bridges. That shit is complicated.
You all seem to want the president to go around issuing edict after edict to fix all the problems in the country like a dictator, assuming that if he actually did that it would work. What a wonderful fantasy that is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That would be true if this were a one-off situation. It's not. It's happened over and over again and he's been directly asked about his prosecutions of whistleblowers for years.
He knows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Fallacy of the excluded middle much? Really, those are the only two possible explanations?
Even if Obama knows, he is one man in charge of an impossible number of things and there are still just 24 hours in his day. Maybe he just can't find the time to deal with this shit right now. You assume so much malice when there are far more mundane explanations.
It also takes a special kind of arrogance and lack of empathy to sit around writing articles complaining about what the President is and isn't doing at micro-levels of detail with only the most minuscule understanding of what it is like to be the President, what powers he actually has, and the complex interpersonal and interagency conflicts that must exist.
Here is a tip, not just for this, but for life in general: if you observe something that doesn't make sense about a complex situation and you have almost no understanding of the details of that complexity, the likelihood is that it actually does make sense for reasons you don't appreciate. You may not like those reasons, but they are rarely simple. Maybe you should withhold your bile until you actually get it...if ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great plan, Mr. President
Luckily we won't have to wonder about this for long, because the President has promised to get us answers. He's put his best people on it: Eric Holder and the DOJ!
One caveat though: who will the President appoint to keep watch on Mr. Holder and make sure he does not torture or detain himself indefinitely? Is John Yoo available?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]