How Can NSA Surveillance Leaks Both Be No Big Deal And Put Us All In Danger?
from the do-tell dept
As the NSA and the administration continue to seek to spin the fallout from the leaks that revealed some of the overreaching surveillance efforts of the NSA, what's incredible is how self-contradictory the statements are, even when coming from the same source. The go-to defender of the program has been Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who has tried arguing both that the leaks and these programs are no big deal and that they present a grave danger to intelligence operations. It's incredible.First, there's playing it down as no big deal:
In a statement issued Saturday, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. described PRISM as “an internal government computer system used to facilitate the government’s statutorily authorized collection of foreign intelligence information from electronic communication service providers under court supervision.”Hmm. So if it's no big deal, and all they're doing is facilitating statutorily authorized collection of data, why all the secrecy? Why not be transparent about all of that? And, also, if it's just keeping track of all the legally obtained stuff, why then would he also say the following:
“PRISM is not an undisclosed collection or data mining program,” the statement said.
“For me, it is literally – not figuratively – literally gut-wrenching to see this happen because of the huge, grave damage it does to our intelligence capabilities,” Clapper told NBC News’s Andrea Mitchell.And later, he claimed that the leaker (this was before Snowden revealed himself) had "chosen to violate a sacred trust for this country" and that the leaks "affects the safety and security of this country."
I can't see any way to put together the earlier statements with the later statements that makes any sense at all. If all they were doing is analyzing statutorily authorized data, then there shouldn't be any concern. We'd expect the NSA to have a computer system to do exactly that, right? So... um... why is it damaging to the nation and putting us all at risk? It seems more likely that the truth is that what was revealed wasn't just a simple system for collecting data, as we can see, but rather just how much information the NSA is gathering up into its huge databases. Furthermore, the idea that this puts us in danger is, frankly, insulting. Most folks involved in terrorist activity already assume their phone calls are being tracked, so it's not like this is going to change their tactics.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dni, james clapper, no big deal, nsa, nsa surveillance, prism, secrecy, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Simple
If Clapper really wanted to make America safe, he'd get control of the corporations whom are exploiting countries around the world, using US soldiers and diplomats as their proxy. Of course it's all in the name of profits. Profits for military equipment, profits for security companies, profits for natural resource companies (oil, metals, etc..), agricultural via food services (McD's harvests cows on their farms in Africa, or at least they used to), etc..
Stop that and you'll stop the terrorist threats. Seriously, do you think Osama would have wanted to attack the US if they were not meddling in Middle Eastern affairs? Some would say "they hate we are free" but that's total bullshit. They hate your interference!
That's how you can have security and liberty co-existing, by NOT giving a reason for security in the first place!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Simple
However, since said intelligence capabilities are by any measure unconstitutional it's not a 'bad' thing to damage them as such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Where Mike fights CISPA without mentioning major data sources Google and Facebook.
06:49:40[h-402-4]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
They make money from advertising and marketing, hence the data mining. They're not a threat, as such, just a minor nuisance when they serve ads on us based on our imagined preferences (they usually get mine wrong).
Settle down and take your meds, Cathy.
This is Cathy: http://3dblogger.typepad.com/wired_state/2012/06/richard-odwyer-must-be-extradicted-and-prosecuted.h tml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
"Government tendencies to overreach their powers by using DRM through corporation backdoors, are NOT in fact due to a long history of states trying to exert their powers using whatever means necessary... but are instead down to, wait for it, pirates. Pirates who DARE to demonstrate that DRM is a utopian fantasy. Aren't I a genius?"
You should surely see how I, as a materialist, am perfectly entitled to treat this view in the same way I treat the Creationist view of the world?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess same way Google both SPIES and "serves".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OOTB
Idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OOTB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
violate a sacred trust?
As far as I can see, Snowden's been truer to his sacred trust than anybody I know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As in, the reason all of these leaks are coming out now is because the powers that be are sufficiently entrenched and secure that they don't really think that having this information come out will accomplish anything that can stop them now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doublethink
�Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.�
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's a simple explanation for this
This shouldn't surprise anyone: THAT'S HIS JOB.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sounds familiar
Funny...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Proof please!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Incredibly Cynical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next they'll say...
It's in the playbook.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next they'll say...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple.
When the people in power spies on the peons it's no big deal in their minds.
When the people in power gets revealed spying on the peons they get in danger of losing elections, careers, money, etc.
And that's why it's both "No Big Deal" and "Very Dangerous" at the same time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"This is totally not a big deal and there was nothing important or newsworthy"
"Releasing this information is literally the same as murdering a billion puppies.. Literally. Whoever did it needs to be buried under a jail"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Has anyone else noticed
NSA PORN
NSA HARDCORE
NSA VIDEOS
NSA HIDDEN CAMERA
NSA SECRETS
Come on... you missed a few!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You weren't SUPPOSED to put his two statements next to each other
Also, on an unrelated note. Adding an 'e' at the end of Grand makes the 'Grande Jury' seem all old timey and less intimidating, like 'ice cream shoppe' - so Snowden has got that going for him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]