Yet Another Teen Making Stupid Jokes On Social Media Now Faces Years In Jail

from the not-this-again dept

It's getting ridiculous just how frequently this sort of thing is happening. We had the so-called Twitter joke trial in the UK, in which Paul Chambers was arrested and tried for making a joke on Twitter about airport closures in which he (very obviously jokingly) "threatened" to blow the airport "sky high" if it wasn't reopened by the time he had to fly. We had the story of Joe Lipari, who was arrested for paraphrasing Fight Club on Facebook in expressing his annoyance with employees at his local Apple store. More recently, we wrote about high school kid Cam D'Ambrosio who was arrested and held without bail for making "terroristic threats," where those "threats" turned out to be some immature boastful rap lyrics that, when actually put in context, didn't actually suggest any threats at all.

The latest one involves Justin Carter, a teenager in Texas who made a joke on Facebook where he and some other kids were hassling each other over the video game League of Legends. One of the kids said something to Justin along the lines of, "Oh you're insane, you're crazy, you're messed up in the head." In response, Justin said:
'Oh yeah, I'm real messed up in the head, I'm going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts,’ and the next two lines were lol and jk.
In context, there is nothing surprising or odd at all about this conversation. It's how teenaged boys communicate. They get on each other and mock each other and the response was actually pretty reasonable. One kid called him insane, and he responded by effectively mocking the claim that he was insane. And then immediately followed it up with lol and jk to cement the fact that he was kidding -- which should have been obvious to everyone anyway, even without the caveats.

But... apparently it was not obvious to the police, or to some very confused woman in Canada who called the police.
Justin Carter was arrested the next month and has been jailed since March 27. He’s charged with making a terroristic threat and is facing eight years in prison, according to his dad.
It turns out that Justin's mother actually posted a comment on our last story about Cam D'Ambrosio, which I didn't see until just now, explaining much of his story as well, and linking to a Change.org petition trying to get her son released from prison.

Once again, this situation is insane. We've reached a point where media hype and moral panics are leading law enforcement to seriously overreact to anything they think is a threat. We have no problem at all with law enforcement checking in on situations like this, but they should quickly realize what it is and move on. To arrest someone for such a joking comment on Facebook, and then to keep him in jail and legitimately claim that it was some sort of "terroristic threat," is shameful and suggests that law enforcement is more interested in building up their "stats" than actually making sure that justice is served and the public is safe.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cam d'ambrosio, joe lipari, justin carter, overreaction, paul chambers, teenagers, terroristic threats


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    silverscarcat (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 6:40am

    Don't mean to sound heartless...

    And, yes, it is terrible that this is happening, but...

    People need to avoid posting stuff to social media, ESPECIALLY Facebook and Twitter.

    You have the paranoid, delusional soccer moms who are all "won't someone PLEASE think of the children!" that spend their time on Facebook.

    You want to communicate with someone online, use private messaging, at least then it's less likely to get seen unless someone brings it to someone else's attention quickly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      jupiterkansas (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:17am

      Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

      It might help to stop hanging out in public places where people might overhear your conversation, and make sure what you say in your own yard isn't audible by your neighbors.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        AB (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:29am

        Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

        and make sure what you say in your own yard isn't audible by your neighbors.

        Including those using directional mikes and/or concealed surveillance equipment.

        >Oh yes, and watch out for lip readers too!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dave Xanatos, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:24am

      Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

      I don't think the correct response is to constantly censor ourselves so we won't be thrown in jail because of reports from paranoid, delusional soccer moms.

      I'm going to go out on a limb and say the correct response is to fix a system that throws people in jail for sarcasm, and to *stop* listening to the aforementioned soccer moms.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:51am

        Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

        I'm going to go out on a limb and say the correct response is to fix a system that throws people in jail for sarcasm, and to *stop* listening to the aforementioned soccer moms.


        Mebbe first oughta take a hard look at how much of problem this is. Could be a big problem is TV just making up stories.

        Now, I don't want to call KVUE reporter Shelton Green a liar. But could be he got fooled by a story he didn't check out carefully enough. Why the heck is this kid's dad on rampage “to warn other parents and teenagers that statements made on social media websites can land them in jail” ?

        NEW BRAUNFELS, Texas – An Austin man wants to warn other parents and teenagers that statements made on social media websites can land them in jail.

        Huh?

        Why isn't this kid's dad more worried about getting his own kid out of a messed-up situation? I don't get the motivation here.

        This story sounds like a plant.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          FarSide (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:15am

          Re: Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

          Yeah, really. Calling national attention to a story and putting pressure on a small DA's office has never prompted changes before. Ever. What a jerk this dad is.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:26am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

            What a jerk this dad is.

            Why is the dad all concerned about helping “ one person to understand that social media is not a playground” ?

            Why isn't the dad all concerned about getting a halfway decent first amendment lawyer for his kid?

            What has been reported doesn't come close to Watts v United States. Whether the DA is an idiot or not. Whether the trial court judge is an idiot or not. There's no way that the facts as reported stand up to serious scrutiny.

            So why isn't the dad more worried about getting a decent first amendment lawyer for his kid? Why isn't the dad more worried about kicking ass in court?

            Why is the dad all concerned about helping “ one person to understand that social media is not a playground” ?

            link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Jason, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:45am

          Re: Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

          Well, since his kid was already convicted and has been in prison for three months, it's pretty likely that the dad feels that drawing media attention to the story IS doing something about it.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        silverscarcat (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:12am

        Re: Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

        The problem is that those soccer moms got those laws made and if ANY politician even *DARES* to fix the laws, then those same soccer moms become demons from hell and go full out defamation on you and screw over your chances of getting re-elected.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Andy, 28 Jun 2013 @ 2:30pm

      Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

      But if we give in to that then the paranoid, delusional soccer moms will win.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Reality Check, 28 Jun 2013 @ 3:28pm

      Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

      All conversation must be kept secret to avoid prison time.

      ALL conversation.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Hot Corn (profile), 19 Mar 2014 @ 6:37pm

      Re: Don't mean to sound heartless...

      Deadpan satire, especially in the form of "Gmail-confessions" in the "name" of well-connected academic department chairs, should also be avoided. See the documentation of America's leading criminal satire trial at:

      http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 7:03am

    Because terrorists always post on the usual channels and leave shitloads of traceable evidence while walking calmly in public places. It's okay if some woman is paranoid but law enforcement should be able to distinguish what's clearly a juvenile joke from a serious threat. Except that law enforcement is even more clueless and paranoid than the woman nowadays.

    Shameful. But not unexpected from a Police State.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      yaga (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 7:37am

      Re:

      It's not a police state, it's an idiot in Canada, an idiot with some power in New Braunfels, TX and an even bigger idiot of a district attorney. Now this case has nothing to do with being a police state and everything to do with a couple of idiots that don't want to admit they are idiots and release the kid. They are going to ride this to a conviction so they can then say they were right for doing what they did, or go down in flames.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:32am

        Re: Re:

        Law enforcement is no longer part of normal society. They are in many cases not considered civilians and they continue to lobby for more oppressive and invasive powers and less oversight and accountability.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Vincent Clement (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:41am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Law enforcement was never part of normal soceity.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Uriel-238 (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:29am

            Crap -- I can't find it.

            The dicta of the Bow Street Runners, I think as written by John Fielding acknowledged that the police must always remain part the people rather than a separate strata. That it must always be recognized that the officer is a job, not a title.

            This was, of course, lost to history, much like the purpose of lawyers to serve justice, rather than money.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        FarSide (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:55am

        Re: Re:

        If it wasn't a police state, this shit never would have gotten this far, and it would have been thrown out immediately.

        Yes, obviously, there are a whole slew of idiots in the chain on this one. But the surrounding police state is what makes the idiots so powerful and dangerous.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Uriel-238 (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:33am

          Once upon a time in terrorized America...

          You never want to live in an era that would make a good setting for a spaghetti western.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        raf (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:09am

        Re: Re:

        Actually I think it shows just the opposite. If it were NOT a police state, it wouldn't even be possible for idiot law enforcers to jail somebody indefinitely for making a trivial comment.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Ninja (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 12:01pm

        Re: Re:

        Yes it is a Police State. It's come down to the point where even the population is paranoid and policing itself. Why would you need cameras or wiretapping when there are good, law abiding citizens to do the job for you?

        IT's just more subtle.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          PaulT (profile), 29 Jun 2013 @ 12:46am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Still not a police state. A result of a litigious mindset and a thin-skinned moron, perhaps, but not a police state,

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:01am

      Re:

      I wonder if this falls into the category of "Too Smart to be a Law Enforcement Officer" where only people with lower IQ's are allowed entry into law enforcement (There are some exceptions)? I guess the law enforcement officer from Harold and Kumar Escape Guantanamo Bay was used to as a reference guid.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        DCX2, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:09am

        Re: Re:

        A reference GUID?

        There's nothing Globally Unique about Idiotic Dumbasses. The world is full of them!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 12:15pm

        Re: Re:

        They can't have intelligent police! If they were intelligent they might start doing stuff like *gasp* question orders or even *gulp* show reasonable discretion in enforcement.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    tcpatriot1 (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:36am

    Yes i've noticed as crime goes down in an area,arrest go up.why because they have to keep that money coming in.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Vincent Clement (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:40am

    Thought police in full control.

    Have an EFF sticker on your laptop? No government job for you.

    Make fun a lesbian in a comedy club? You just violated her rights.

    Fly a plane from California to the east coast? You must be a drug smuggler.

    Make a stupid comment about killing a group of people as a joke? Go to jail as a terrorist.

    Make freely-available information easier to access? Get charged with enough charges to be jailed for 30 years.

    And on and on it goes.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:11am

      Re:

      Absolutely if this is the world we are going to live in, the terrorist groups have already effectively and thoroughly trampled our way of life.

      We reeeeally need this old generation to die off as fast as humanly possible so we can go to work on the monumental task of getting the world back on track.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:21am

        Re: Re:

        We reeeeally need this old generation to die off as fast as humanly possible so we can go to work on the monumental task of getting the world back on track.


        This sentiment is expressed by every generation, and nearly every time it works out the same: by the time the young guard achieves positions of power, they are the old guard that needs to die off.

        I suspect that's because this isn't really an age-related or generational issue. It's an issue of entrenched bureaucracy and what happens when people who desire power finally achieve it.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:10am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Old people eventually die, but the bureaucracy always remains, ready to force the next generation into being its slaves, such has been the way since ancient times.

          What we need are not younger people, but smarter people, people who are smart enough, and bold enough to tackle the bureaucracy head on.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Robert Doyle (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:42am

        Re: Re:

        Umm... it wasn't the terrorists who did this... we did this to ourselves.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          AB (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:49am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Exactly. This is an excellent example of the terrorists success. They have won the war by reducing us to fighting amongst ourselves.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:23am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            The terrorists won the war on terror the first time an innocent person was strip-searched after 9/11.

            Their objective was not to conquer by military force, but rather to make us fight ourselves (as the above poster said), to inspire fear and terror, that's why we call them terrorists.

            They accomplished these goals practically the next day...

            We are deluding ourselves if we think we are doing anything right now except exactly what they want us to do.

            The terrorists, and every other enemy of the U.S. are laughing at us right now, for in our fear and terror, we have lost the freedom has been a defining characteristic of our nation since its inception. We have lost the freedom that men and women fought for and died defending for nearly 300 years, and we lost it practically overnight.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:25am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              And do you know what the worst part is? Hardly anyone seems to care...

              link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Jason, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:28am

        Re: Re:

        "Absolutely if this is the world we are going to live in, the terrorist groups have already effectively and thoroughly trampled our way of life."

        DAMMIT STOP SAYING THAT CRAP!!

        9/11 was twelve years ago. We can't blame the terrorists for this. We have effectively shat upon our way of life our damn-selves!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Ruben, 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:54am

          Re: Re: Re:

          9/11 was twelve years ago. We can't blame the terrorists for this. We have effectively shat upon our way of life our damn-selves!

          Indeed, (the success of)terrorism is at least partly to blame for where we sit today. In order to defeat terrorism, you have to not let it effect you in any way. Yet ever since 9/11, (preventing) terrorism has been scapegoated every time there's someone flying off the hinges when someone makes an ill conceived joke or takes a picture of a gov't building.

          I'd say that this is an unqualified success for the terrorists. What we've done to ourselves in the name of "protecting" ourselves from terrorists is far beyond even the wet dreams of Osama.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      TheLastCzarnian (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:31am

      Re:

      You forgot the flip-side.
      Flagged by another government as a terrorist? No one tells anyone about it.
      Make terristic comments on an Jihadist web site? All is cool. The NSA knows who you are, but they need to get to "the big guys" so they leave you alone.

      The idiots in the government are too wrapped up with the "big arrest" that makes national news. They totally avoid opportunites to warn local authorities and communities about the possible threats in their midst, while law enforcement overreacts to the little they are alerted to.

      Has anyone ever looked into the average IQ and education of a law-enforcement officer? The 3 that I know barely passed High School, and one became an FBI agent!
      It could be that the reason that the police seem so stupid is because, well, they are.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        FarSide (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:19am

        Re: Re:

        It's funny you say that, but the couple people I graduated with (15 years ago now) that went on to become the local town cops were nearly the dumbest kids in my class.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Loki, 28 Jun 2013 @ 1:27pm

      Re:

      But without these arrests, confiscations and seizures, how else are the NSA, FBI and such going to be able to have claimed having stopped over 50 potential terrorist plots?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:48am

    That's particularly violent regardless if it's a joke to the person saying it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:56am

      Re:

      So?

      What relevance does that have to whether or not the kid should be in jail for 1 day, let alone months?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      AB (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:16am

      Re:

      And having the FBI break down the kid's door should have been more then enough to leave him shitting himself. Follow that up with a quiet warning and you would have a citizen so uptight you could use him as a flag pole.

      Taking it to this level not only wastes national resources but is so far past reality that any lesson will be completely lost. Heck, it might even have the opposite effect and turn him into a bitter rebellious 'terrorist' criminal.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jason, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:39am

      Re:

      Unless of course it's sarcasm, and then it's just sarcasm.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:49am

    it's got nothing whatsoever to do with 'media hype and moral panics'. this and all similar examples are being used as a way to scare the crap out of people and give the overreaching desires of some police and security services the justification to arrest people and make out that they are heroes and have saved the city or country, if not the entire planet from being blown apart or overrun by God knows what, or God knows who from God knows where. it makes them feel good and makes them sound good even though in reality what they did was lock up a kid from using his mouth too much at the wrong time! if he has been in jail since March and especially if he is still in jail now, the authorities ought to be ashamed of themselves! funny how they have no trouble finding and imprisoning people under these sort of circumstances but cant seem to get 'real criminals' to be so stupid! that fact on it's own says what, do you think?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:01am

      Re:

      He needs a really good attorney to not only defend him but also to hold the police, DA, and the judge accountable for their actions. I see a large civil suit in the future for this case and I'm sure there are lots of good attorneys out there that would be more than happy to take up this task.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        AB (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:22am

        Re: Re:

        Unfortunately the government has been busily 'tweaking' the laws to eliminate the accountability aspects that used to protect the innocent by allowing those civil actions.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:52am

    "League of Legends"

    Oh, that makes it all clear.

    The LoL crowd are stupid beyond redemption. Fortunately, they are also pathetically wimpy.

    Heck, they consistently give up* in the game once you turn up the heat, instead of taking it all the way like a man, no matter how bleak the situation looks.

    So I wouldn't fear anything from them, other than being annoyed to death. That, and being called gay.



    * LoL is a team game. Two teams go up against each other. There is a surrender option, but the majority of the team must vote positively for the surrender to take effect. The effect is immediate loss of the game, obviously. It's a form of rage-quitting, but the team must be as much of a pathetic loser as you, and agree to rage quit with you.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:54am

    I was about to make a comment...

    But I just got my ration of Victory Gin, and it's about time for the two minute hate.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 8:58am

    this plus NSA and the rest will make our technology future sooooooooooooo much fun.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DCX2, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:08am

    The Canadian woman is part of Anonymous!

    Justin’s dad says the woman did a Google search and found his son’s old address was near an elementary school and she called police.


    Sounds like Anonymous alright.

    lol
    jk

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      AB (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:34am

      Re: The Canadian woman is part of Anonymous!

      Exactly! She as much as admitted to using a computer. Or iphone or something.

      Wait.. She used something with buttons? That means she's a terrorist too! Quick, sound the alarm; send in the police! TERRORIST! TERRORIST! TERRORIST!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:32am

    Don't believe this

    From the article:
    “If I can just help one person to understand that social media is not a playground, that when you go out there into social media, when you use Facebook, when you use Twitter, when you go out there and make comments on news articles, and the things you are saying can and will be used against you," added Jack Carter.

    Why does the kid's dad sound like he's running a media campaign here? I mean, I could kinda understand he's under a lot of pressure —worried about his kid— and in the circumstances he says some weird things.

    But this doesn't sound weird—it sounds phony.

    It would sound alright if his kid was already dead. And the dad was going on a crusade against teen-age drinking or something. But that's not the situation here.

    This story rings false to me.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:24am

      Re: Don't believe this

      I dunno... if I had an 18yr old nerdy kid (he had to be somewhat nerdy to play LoL no?) in jail for 2 mo. for doing absolutely nothing, I'd be screaming from the rooftops.

      If the kid was in either his freshman year of college, or his senior year of highschool, getting thrown in jail and missing the end of the year is pretty harmful, both emotionally and academically.

      You sound more phony than the father does.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:45am

        Re: Re: Don't believe this

        You sound more phony than the father does.

        On the facts as reported, this is an objectively unreasonable prosecution. I don't say that lightly.

        At this point, the most charitable explanation is that the facts are being significantly misreported.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:37am

    What the hell happened to the days when you scare the hell out of someone (cop threatening to arrest you), explain what COULD happen and why what they did was wrong, then letting them off with a warning.

    Plus when the hell did we start listening to Cananananadins who call in about domestic American teenage boy terrorists?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 4:31pm

      Re:

      Law enforcement and DAs live in mortal fear that that teenager they thought was no big deal will later be the next Columbine or Sandy Hook.

      Since there are few to no costs to the DA or LEO to pursue the case, and a big public downside, like doctors afraid of malpractice suits, they practice "defensive prosecution."

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymously Brave, 28 Jun 2013 @ 9:46am

    See? It's working....

    Anyone want to place bets that the next time the feds speak out in support of the NSA spying programs, the number of foiled terrorist plots will have risen to 51?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jasmine Charter, 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:24am

    He's an idiot...

    The kid is an idiot. Most people are idiots.

    People post things on social media like they're in private chatting with their friends. IDIOTS. Everything is stored, sorted and available for whatever law enforcement agency feels like hassling you at the moment.

    Lawmakers are idiots too. Zero tolerance means zero intelligence.

    Let's look at this realistically...

    Did he threaten someone specific - no
    Did he have a plan - no
    Did he have the means to carry out the (non-existant) plan - no
    Could an idiot in a hurry realize he was joking - yes

    The fact is... we live in a world of idiots. If you don't take precautions, YOU are an idiot.

    Don't joke around in writing - ANYWHERE. Not even your private emails are safe anymore and most likely your cell phones aren't safe either.

    So... just use a little common sense.

    Sadly... as Ben Franklin said in the 18th century... Common sense isn't that common. And it's gotten less so in the last 3 hundred years.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    James (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 10:46am

    "Why should I worry?"

    This is another data point in the argument against, "I haven't done anything wrong. Why should I care if the NSA monitors my every utterance and online post?"

    And for the Dad-haters - maybe, just maybe, the Old Man is hoping that others will learn, by the example of his son's incarceration, of the dangers of posting "casual" threats.

    Used to be, if you were in a "bad part of town," you'd keep your mouth shut about the way someone was dressed or how hot a woman looked - the local denizens might just inflict some instant justice on you for your freedom of expression.

    Now, the thugs wear suits (or uniforms) and use the courts, rather than their fists.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:54am

    In context, there is nothing surprising or odd at all about this conversation. It's how teenaged boys communicate.

    This statement tells you everything you need to know about Mike Masnick.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 1:11pm

    I'm already anticipating a bullet on a future NSA fact sheet: NSA surveillance of online video game communication prevents millions of terrorist plots.

    Just think of all the children saved! Oh wait, they're all in prison for trash talking in a video game due to 30 years of trumped up charges.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 1:23pm

    "'Oh yeah, I'm real messed up in the head, I'm going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts,’ and the next two lines were lol and jk."

    He should have said it like so.

    "'Oh yeah, *SARCASM I love it* I'm real messed up in the head *SARCASM* , I'm going to go shoot up a school *SARCASM I hate guns.* full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts*SARCASM I'm a vegetarian* ,’ and the next two lines were lol *Laughing out loud" and jk *Just kidding*."

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    special-interesting (profile), 28 Jun 2013 @ 4:17pm

    What we have here is a large red panic button. You know. The same huge, 3 ft round, red button drawn so cleverly in a Gary Larson cartoon with the caption underneath; “I wonder what this button does?” Its normal that we don't push it until we come to a situation that we do not understand or fear.

    This directly effects even kids and ordinary citizens who joke, parody or comment explicitly on current events or affairs. Its probably a crime in itself that the overreactions of these mistaken/misguided officials are not criminal offenses in themselves.

    Yes. We are pointing to the panic button pressed by clueless, careless and obviously ignorant government officials, explicitly highlighting, law enforcement officers. More explicitly is the history of such a large and overly used panic button given out to overly terrorist sensitive officials at every level.

    --

    Peabody; Set the wayback machine for circa 2000 sept 11th (Bullwinkle) when Bushy Boy needlessly? pushed the panic button. This act literally stopped US commerce dead in its tracks for way over a week at untold trillions of lost business. While, the rest of us cleaned up the mess he, and his vice, cowered in deep armored bunkers. Safe?

    None of this was necessary. (as especially these very same scenarios were written in books long before with some countermeasures described.) Of course this is only for those paying attention to commerce and democratic values. (an, unfortunately, great minority) US economic decline was unfortunately just beginning. (trillions lost is... lost!)

    In the eye of many forevermore will the nickname Bushy Boy be never forgotten. Bush, Bush Jr. and W were erased from memory as disgrace. A legacy buried amidst the rage expressed in future wars and secret national security projects that might be a psychological crutch to make up for being scared.

    Once one panics, the normal response is to, try and make up for it by justifying ones actions. Terrorists make a great disguise to bury ones fears in. It sounds rational and gets even normal citizens/voters to consider it as plausible. Plausible enough to violate Constitutional Rights?

    Of course. One may be forgiven for panicking once, or twice, over some extreme incident or provocation. When one does not stop panicking then there is cause for psychological concerns about the obvious impact, of actions taken under, duress. Chronic medical reasoning comes into effect.

    For the recored; A panicked individual almost never admits the affliction. Defensive maneuvers are normal. Fear is something that destroys everything about oneself/the-individual. The big question; Would Bushy Boy destroy an entire American Culture, economy and nation because of his own fears and the medically obvious psychological responses?

    History suggests the panic button was not pushed once, but many/multiple times. This would feed right into the hands of a waiting, also paranoid, bureaucracy which would do nothing but expand upon the likely gullible fears of the current president.

    >Push the panic button; Spend unremittingly on US security programs and waste billions on creating huge useless new agencies and departments. All of which would violate the Constitution.

    >Push the panic button; Go to war. (Twice! Does that count as two pushes of the panic button?) Waste untold trillions while telling the public it would only cost billions. (like that was any reason to go to war?) Effectively lie about the actual reason (claims of WMD) to go to war.

    >Push the panic button; We're broke! (not publicly claimed at the time) Publicly spoken; “We need a national stimulus plan to stimulate the economy!” Of course what was not spoken was that the war in Afghanistan and Iraq had bankrupted the US government and they needed to keep spending so their black-box/defense contractors (be) happy.

    Black box contractors... now where did all that, national stimulus plan, money go? Not the US economy thats for sure. Unless you consider all the [redacted] spending on NSA national security operations let alone the [black box] private contractors. (In support in foreign warfare?)

    (mantra) No money was spent on a extremely profitable (however risky) space program, no national Interstate highway system, no railway system and not even a very questionable health-care program however wasteful. (etc.) National investment strategy? (...) None!

    Revenge? Bushy Boy... What are you thinking? Does national economics mean anything? What does a vector mean to you? Where are you headed and do you want to lead America,as a whole, with you? Bleah.

    >Push the panic button (again); Keep spending on NSA nonsense. Huge amounts in extremely constitutionally questionable programs. Things that Stalin, KGB, Stazi and Hitler would be proud of. If we are talking that Constitutionally correct law is good...

    Then Bushy Boy is waaaaayyy out there in nutso land. Very bad. Way out of American Cultural values.

    So we end the Bushy Boy presidential term with the TSA, DHS and the newly empowered NSA. (and whatever classified nonsense) And. Obama takes over But, where does he lead?

    A police state is, presently, not undeniable. Under any administration. Where are the elected judges who care about and claim constitutional values in their campaign election speeches? (Who's listening?)



    So... we have Justin Carter arrested and in jail for... the insecurities of a past president? What form of Constitutional justice is that? Texting an inappropriate message is not in any way “reasonable cause”.

    Is this analysis wrong in any way? (many points, and button, pushing was missed, am sure)




    Reactionary,

    silverscarcat. Its so wild, terifing and yet understandable that the soccer mom will freak out once its their kid being accused of some weird imagined terrorist threat. These days even throwing a firecracker is connived into some wild threat to mankind.

    Dave Zanatos. Yes its the random reports from “soccer moms” that are the most dangerous. They are a panicky bunch. Soccer moms are a danger to democratic society?

    Andy; “But if we give in to that then the paranoid, delusional soccer moms will win” Yes! Its a shame that these very same delusional soccer moms will have their houses/cars/belongings confiscated when their sparkling kid/son/daughter will be accused of drugs. (delusional is a good term here)

    All personal messaging should be encrypted especially amongst friends. Some shared (10k+) key would be best. Its kind of normal once u think about it. Its unfortunate that most people don't think.

    AC, Vincent Clement and Urriel238; Its good when police officers surrender their badges and guns when their shift is over. When they are normal citizens they better empathize with constitutional norms.


    Hohn Fenderson; “”We reeeeally need this old generation to die off as fast as humanly possible so we can go to work on the monumental task of getting the world back on track””

    Most WWII veterans are, currently, dieing of shock and remorse for dieing and fighting freedom... in vein. (!!?!) (...) All that they fought for is being lost in front of their eyes. Its a horror of liberty that goes beyond speakable atrocities.

    The great problem is voter apathy; “We vote for party A or B because...?” we don't know any better?


    AC; “The terrorists, and every other enemy of the U.S. are laughing at us right now, for in our fear and terror, we have lost the freedom has been a defining characteristic of our nation since its inception. We have lost the freedom that men and women fought for and died defending for nearly 300 years, and we lost it practically overnight.”

    Very well put. Actually, we gave it away in panic an fear? Who do w we consider “strong” leaders; Ones who profess skill, power and maneuvering over ones who claim Constitutional mastery?



    Loki: “But without these arrests, confiscations and seizures, how else are the NSA, FBI and such going to be able to have claimed having stopped over 50 potential terrorist plots?”

    Anonymously Brave; It is likely that Justine Carter will be included as the 51 terrorist threat thwarted by the NSA in their next report to Congress.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dave Xanatos, 28 Jun 2013 @ 5:07pm

      Re:

      "Yes its the random reports from “soccer moms” that are the most dangerous. They are a panicky bunch. Soccer moms are a danger to democratic society? "

      No, blindly giving in to panicky hyperbolic ravings from any person or group is a danger to society, democratic or not.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jennifer, 28 Jun 2013 @ 7:52pm

    new social media formats?

    Kid shoul dn't of gone to jail. Stop it with falsely accusing people of mental illnesses or criminal behavior.

    Judges who love stereotypical prejudices and behavior. Intimidation and cruelty. so just stop it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2013 @ 11:58pm

    well, some believe ( like i did) that police protects peace and order and people... wrong; police forces protect government and those with power.
    Now the next is true also: it is people who give those in power the same (power).
    The point of the comment ( to the "woman from Canada" and the likes): stop turning into TV cockroaches and start investigating about who commits all those terrorist acts (not kids).

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), 3 Jul 2013 @ 1:05pm

    An ugly situation gets uglier.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.