FCC: Telcos Must Protect The Privacy Of Mobile Metadata That The NSA Insists Isn't Private
from the left-hand?-speak-to-the-right-hand dept
So the FCC has announced new rules saying that mobile operators must protect the privacy of their users, including around various metadata:"When mobile carriers use their control of customers' devices to collect information about customers' use of the network, including using preinstalled apps ... carriers are required to protect that information," the FCC said in a statement today. "This sensitive information can include phone numbers that a customer has called and received calls from, the durations of calls, and the phone's location at the beginning and end of each call."This came out, ostensibly, in response to an investigation by the FCC into the use of services like Carrier IQ by various mobile carriers, whereby they were collecting a ton of data about how everyone used their phones.
However, when put into the context of the news of the month: the federal government's dragnet surveillance efforts, which involves hoovering up all metadata on every single phone call made... it suddenly becomes somewhat interesting. On the one hand, you have the administration and its defenders claiming that there's no expectation of privacy in "metadata" like phone numbers, duration of calls and the phone's location. And yet, now you have the FCC, also a part of the same administration, flat out telling the world (and the telcos) that there's clearly an expectation of privacy in exactly the same information. And, of course, once you have that expectation of privacy, the 4th Amendment applies, no matter how many times the NSA says otherwise...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 4th amendment, expectation of privacy, fcc, metadata, mobile operators, nsa, nsa surveillance, privacy
Companies: carrier iq
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Permissions Required:
Serial Number
Phone Number
GPS Coordination
Storage Access
Sex
Blood Type
Network Connections
Personal Information
Last Date You Got Laid
4 Digits of SSN
Mother's Maiden Name
Yeah, I get the feeling no goddamn telco is going to "protect" customer metadata.
Call it a hunch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have a term for WHAT?
It's like learning that Hufflepuff is the house in which everyone gets laid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There is no such thing. Either something is a civil matter or a criminal matter, or sometimes both. I think you meant a civil offense rather than civil crime. And "criminal crimes" is just plain redundant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe it's like a marital vow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still, the NSA couldn't care less about the Constitution, why would they care about some lousy FCC stuff?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Information
[ link to this | view in chronology ]