NSA Bosses Mantra: Who Cares What The Law Says, 'Collect It All'
from the law-enforcement's-job-isn't-supposed-to-be-easy dept
The Washington Post has a profile of NSA boss Keith Alexander in which they make it clear that his passion is to "collect it all" when it comes to data.“Rather than look for a single needle in the haystack, his approach was, ‘Let’s collect the whole haystack,’ ” said one former senior U.S. intelligence official who tracked the plan’s implementation. “Collect it all, tag it, store it. . . . And whatever it is you want, you go searching for it.”Others have certainly reported on this before, including long-time NSA watcher James Bamford, but more and more people are realizing how the NSA functions these days. Combine the "collect it all" mentality with the fact that Alexander is the head of both the NSA, which is supposed to do signal intelligence, and the US Cyber Command, which is supposed to handle cyber security, and you have a clear conflict of interests that can lead to some sticky situations.
“He is the only man in the land that can promote a problem by virtue of his intelligence hat and then promote a solution by virtue of his military hat,” said one former Pentagon official, voicing a concern that the lines governing the two authorities are not clearly demarcated and that Alexander can evade effective public oversight as a result. The former official spoke on the condition of anonymity to be able to talk freely.Remember how we just had the talking points that the NSA used with the media concerning the Utah Bluffdale data center. In those talking points, the NSA played up the US Cyber Command aspects, and how they were "partnering" with tech companies for that purpose. They left out almost entirely the surveillance side of things. And that's the problem. The NSA under Alexander can hide under the claim that they're trying to "protect our networks" allowing them to avoid admitting that they're collecting everything and spying on everyone.
Furthermore, the moral panics and FUD that Alexander spews to make his job easier is really quite sickening:
“Everyone also understands,” he said, “that if we give up a capability that is critical to the defense of this nation, people will die.”You can't have perfect security, and there are serious tradeoffs that Alexander doesn't seem to care about in collecting all data. There's little actual evidence that these activities have really prevented anything serious that couldn't have been prevented via more traditional means.
Furthermore, there's a key point in all of this that often gets ignored: the US Constitution was put in place, on purpose, with the idea that "making law enforcement's job easier" is not a valid excuse. The whole point of civil liberties is that we recognize that we give people more freedoms and that means law enforcement's job is harder. But we think that's a good thing, because we trust that on the whole, keeping the innocent from being spied upon and accused is much more important that stopping every possible crime or finding every criminal. But, General Alexander and others in the NSA appear to want to flip this concept on its head. And that's incredibly dangerous.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: collect it all, cybersecurity, keith alexander, nsa, nsa surveillance, privacy, us cyber command
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
NSA is quietly writing code for Google�s Android OS
http://refreshingnews99.blogspot.in/2013/07/nsa-is-quietly-writing-code-for-googles.html
US blocks crackdown on tax avoidance by net firms like Google and Amazon
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jul/14/us-tax-avoidance-google-amazon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
The code in question is SE for Android, an Android-specific derivation of SELinux. SELinux has been part of mainstream Linux distros for a decade. While the NSA did contribute code to SELinux, SELinux is a standalone open source project with many contributors, and, more importantly, reviewers. Ditto for SE for Android.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
This is not a bug, its a feature.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, let's name "tech companies", starting with Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, I do understand that. But, two things:
1) I dispute that the phone metadata for the entire country is "critical to the defense of the nation".
2) People MAY die, but sometimes that is the tradeoff. Perhaps fewer people would die if police were allowed to put people in prison without all the proper evidence. If the NYPD could just imprison some of those young black males instead of merely frisking them... why, the murder rate probably would drop. The police often know who the gang members are, after all. But I think we can all agree that this would NOT be an acceptable thing to do, even if it would save lives. Lives saved are important, but sometimes liberty is more important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is not a valid reason to violate the Constitution to generate a Stazi government. This whole spying business is out of hand.
The problem with hunting haystacks for needles is the same one that the Stazi had. We're collecting their data so they must be guilty of something. After all we took the time to collect it. Add to this secret government laws no one knows about but those involved with this spying arm and suddenly you are up for charges you never knew existed. That's not what democracy is about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typo
I think you mean James Bamford.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Effectiveness
Anyone who understands data analysis realizes that collect everything will swamp the available analysts and police officers, and people will die because of the 'terrorists' that get to carry out an attack. I.e. Boston.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The majority of the time, it's off topic, rants and raves having nothing to do with the post, totally without reference to anything he claims beyond his wild imagination, even when called on it, and frequently dealing with his man crush over Mike.
It pretty much guarantees all his posts will be reported to hide the village idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Never off topic
Try to explain that away, MIKE!
(Did I sound enough like the real ootb? Or do I need to add the "loopy tour" sig?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Never off topic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Never off topic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Never off topic
+1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Never off topic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some things are worth dieing for.
Americans throughout history have been willing to die to protect our constitutional freedoms. We'll even die to help protect the freedom of others in foreign lands. I think the government is making a huge assumption (Ass U Me) that we are willing to give up those freedoms for safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Some things are worth dieing for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Some things are worth dieing for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hold on a minute...
So with enough capabilities of the US goverment we can live forever? Sorry guys, I used to be on board and against these spying programs too, but with this new revelation I'm now down for the cause! Spy on me all you want good guy NSA, wait... is the S for the Singularity?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So far they've not seen evidence of it from us, have they?
"So what if they collect all my data-I have nothing to hide!"
That's the collective mantra of most people in this country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wondered what that dream of a giant pink cube descending on me meant...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummm
I would like to counter with
"Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death"
Talk about pissing on everything the USA was founded on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They probably are
The US Constitution may be the law of the land but they have broken the rules of the US Constitution so many times to where that you can find articles, videos, and the like of people running the Government making jokes of it, and even calling it just a #$%$#$@ piece of paper. ...and the American people continue to ignore what is going on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They probably are
Interesting. Why not go ahead and release it then? I'll go ahead and borrow the NSA's excuse: We have to know what the government is doing in order to keep them safe.
After all, we're supposed to feel safe when they spy on us, so they shouldn't take issue when the shoe's on the other foot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They probably are
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pokemon mode?
Pokemon mode?
As it gotta catch 'em all?
good luck containing all of these data in a second by the thousands, if not millions...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
to paraphase... badly
NSA boss Keith Alexander: "Collect it all, let God...um...FISA...um.. someone sort it out."
NSA boss Keith Alexander: "On second thought, let just keep it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aerys Targaryen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]