Jimmy Carter Says NSA Scandal Shows America Has No Functioning Democracy
from the strong-words dept
Former President Jimmy Carter apparently is not impressed by the excuses the government has made about the NSA surveillance scandals, stating that America has no functioning democracy at a meeting in Atlanta, attended by a reporter from the German newspaper Der Spiegel. This follows on some of Carter's earlier statements, which argued that "the invasion of human rights and American privacy has gone too far," and also that, "this invasion of privacy has been excessive, so I think that the bringing of it to the public notice has probably been, in the long term, beneficial." When even former Presidents are saying this sort of thing, isn't it time for our existing President to recognize that the surveillance state has gone too far?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: democracy, ed snowden, jimmy carter, nsa, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The only difference now is that the journalists and public are the enemy of the state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I guess I'm paying attention to the right media.
The only way to fix mainstream media is to turn it off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No American outlets covered the event
“No American outlets covered the event.”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No American outlets covered the event
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No American outlets covered the event
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: No American outlets covered the event
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: No American outlets covered the event
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: No American outlets covered the event
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: No American outlets covered the event
How many Americans read, or are even aware of The Guardian?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It all changed after Carter.
If only Carter sent more helicopters. The fool things are unreliable. Need 3? Send 9! We would live in a different world today.
I wonder how much of presidential fascism is fear of suffering Jimmy Carter's fate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It all changed after Carter.
You mean since Eisenhower.
And even he, as POTUS and former Supreme Allied Commander, was unable to stop it.
And not for lack of trying. His "military industrial complex" speech was given 3 days before he left office - it was his admission of defeat and plea for the American people to resist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It all changed after Carter.
"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing".
Watergate. FISC was introduced as a defensive counter intelligence measure, but it already constituted a secret court, in sharp contrast to the recommandations of Eisenhower about knowledgeable citizenry. But the next 20 years requests were far less than we see from 2005 untill today.
Why? In 2001 after 9/11 FISCs authorization was expanded a lot to "prevent terrorism". The leap from protection against foreign espionage to terrorism is quite steep and the courts power has inevitably increase substantially.
In 2003 the court was critizised for its secrecy being a problem by a senate overview report.
2004-2008 the critizism was ignored and the scope of FISC has been expanded several times.
Removing FISC should obviously be a top priority. After that, the anti-corruption level should be cranked up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am not interested in human personality stories. I am not too interested in the government propaganda that is allowed to leak secrets without a peep of screaming national secrets but then turn around and file court charges against those that embarrass them.
I will take foreign news sites, realizing they too have a bias, just not always in the interest of making the US look good. At least you're liable to see stuff there hidden by MSM for whatever reason, including self interest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
America has no functioning democracy..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: America has no functioning democracy..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mr. Carter
I don't care to listen to ignorant people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mr. Carter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mr. Carter
Since that was offered in a single sentence, I'll have to assume you didn't even read it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think it should be "a former President..."
Carter's only one out of five Presidents still living today. Since Bush is still defending the surveillance he started in his term, that cancels out Carter's vote, leaving support by living Presidents at least four-to-one.
Unless we start counting all the dead ones, then it's fair game.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 18th, 2013 @ 5:13pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 18th, 2013 @ 5:13pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We need to do away with the mainstream media, political parties, lobbying/Super PACs, banking cartels and military/industrial complex before we'll have a president who actually serves this country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
moral story
You may not agree with his opinions, but you cannot deny that he is a decent moral man, who is not one to look you in the eye and lie to you the way all his predecessors have.
And I agree with the above commenter, who said it was Carter's honesty and decency that made him a target of the political establishment starting with Satan himself, Ronald Wilson Reagan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Case in point? The "supposed" New York terrorist who was rumored to have created a car bomb, locked his car door, placed the keys to the car in the tailpipe and then forgot where he left the car keys at. Or what about the shoe bomber who tried getting through airport security, or the underwear bomber?
Terrorists are not that stupid to be that blatant about it.
While this was all created under President Bush, it's President Obama who is in the hot seat because he has taken this program to heights never before even conceived. Republicans aren't the ones who demanded "ALL" of Verizon's metadata on its customers and it's not Republicans who are spying on every American citizen in this country.
Democrats should not be making excuses but rather introducing new bills and new policies to scale back this spying. They should not be moving forward and expanding it. That is not what The Patriot Act was created for. It simply gave unlimited power to the Federal government and I have never heard of a time when our government acted responsibly with that power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Media muddling
Used to be Presidents, sitting and retired, were listened to with some respect. Now they're ignored.
As for the coverage-it might not be very well known, but Apple does not like to cover any foreign station (TV or radio) on their IPod..and if you have an app that is supposed to receive them, you'll be lucky to hear half of them half of the time. Fox News and CNN are their preferred media providers. Everyone else can go to hell-especially France 24 or that subversive Iranian TV..all of the 'bad guys' who don't kotow to the American corporate mind think.
It's called the "freedom of the press" and most media corporations just don't like it.
Nothing to see here-move along and accept your daily dose of pre-programmed garbage that is offered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so sad to see what was once the greatest country on Earth, (not just the greatest power on Earth), change so much, become such a self-interested, bullying, undemocratic democracy that it is unbelievable!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As US president, James Earl Carter
Henri
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
security vetting the dead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]