Even Powering Down A Cell Phone Can't Keep The NSA From Tracking Its Location

from the making-a-strong-case-for-Snowden's-fridge-logic dept

We know how much information the NSA can grab in terms of cell phone usage -- namely, calls made and received and length of conversations, along with phone and phone card metadata like IMSI and IMEI numbers. It can even grab location data, although for some reason, it claims it never does. (No matter, plenty of law enforcement agencies like gathering location data, so it's not like that information is going to waste [bleak approximation of laughter]).

According to Ryan Gallagher at Slate, the NSA, along with other agencies, are able to something most would feel to be improbable, if not impossible: track the location of cell phones even if they're turned off.

On Monday, the Washington Post published a story focusing on how massively the NSA has grown since the 9/11 attacks. Buried within it, there was a small but striking detail: By September 2004, the NSA had developed a technique that was dubbed “The Find” by special operations officers. The technique, the Post reports, was used in Iraq and “enabled the agency to find cellphones even when they were turned off.” This helped identify “thousands of new targets, including members of a burgeoning al-Qaeda-sponsored insurgency in Iraq,” according to members of the special operations unit interviewed by the Post.
Normally, turning a cell phone off cuts the connection to towers, effectively taking it off the grid and making it only traceable to the last point it was connected. The Post article doesn't explain exactly how the NSA accomplishes it, but other incidents over the past half-decade offer a few indications of how this might be done.
In 2006, it was reported that the FBI had deployed spyware to infect suspects’ mobile phones and record data even when they were turned off... In 2009, thousands of BlackBerry users in the United Arab Emirates were targeted with spyware that was disguised as a legitimate update. The update drained users’ batteries and was eventually exposed by researchers, who identified that it had apparently been designed by U.S. firm SS8, which sells “lawful interception” tools to help governments conduct surveillance of communications.
The FBI's use, in which cell phones' microphones were remotely activated to record conversations (even with the phones turned off), probably had some bearing on Snowden's request that journalists power down their phones and place them in the fridge.

According to Gallagher, the NSA may be using mass updates to infect phones of targets overseas (and presumably, any "non-targets" applying the same faux update). This would be difficult, but not impossible, and considering what we've learned about the NSA's far-reaching surveillance net, certainly not implausible. A couple of details in support of that theory:

First, two telcos that provide service to millions of cell phone users are known to be overly cooperative with intelligence agencies. You may recall the fact that Verizon and AT&T notably did not sign the collective letter asking the government to allow affected companies to release information on government requests for data. Given this background, it's not unimaginable that Verizon and AT&T would accommodate the NSA (and FBI) if it wished to use their update systems to push these trojans.

Add to this the fact that Microsoft and others have allowed intelligence agencies early access to security flaws, allowing them to exploit these for a certain length of time before informing the public and patching the holes. Add these two together and you've got the means and the opportunity to serve snooping malware to millions of unsuspecting cell phone users.

Sparing usage, properly targeted isn't really an issue. But if updates containing spyware have been pushed to the thousands of non-targeted individuals just to ensure the targets are included, it becomes more problematic, and the track record of the two agencies who have used this technology is far from pristine.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fbi, mobile phones, nsa, nsa surveillance, surveillance, tracking, trojans


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 2:50pm

    so, thousands get infected phones in order to infect and detect the ones specifically wanted and it's ok to do that. how come then, if i was to do something, even unwittingly, unintentionally, to just one phone, i would get the book thrown at me and then watch the key going over the side after being locked up? hardly seems right, somehow!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Baldaur Regis (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 2:58pm

    To paraphrase a popular movie line:
    Anybody who uses a cell phone in the Middle East is a terrorist. Anybody who turns their cell phone off in the Middle East is a well-disciplined terrorist.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Androgynous Cowherd, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:05pm

    Pull the battery

    Pull the battery, and none of these tricks will work. (The NSA must love iPhones because of this.)

    Another possible malware administration route would be a Stingray masquerading as a normal cell tower.

    IMO, installing spyware on someone's phone or computer is an extremely intrusive act that should, if permitted at all, require a narrow and specific warrant. It's very much equivalent to planting a bug or a camera in someone's home or office, and they surely need a warrant backed by a buttload of probable cause to do that.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:14pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      Hal Turner mentioned something like that when he had his show years ago, and mentioned that he took the battery out of his cell phone, whenever he was at any of the white supremacist rallies he used to attend.

      Taking the battery out would definitely stop the microphone from working and would prevent the GPS function of the phone from working.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:37pm

        Re: Re: Pull the battery

        until they make it illegal for smartphones to have removable batteries.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Niall (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 5:13am

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          HTC and Apple are already rendering that law unnecessary!

          link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:21am

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          until they make it illegal for smartphones to have removable batteries.


          In which case, you just put the phone in a faraday cage (wrapping it in aluminum foil is adequate).

          But if you do this, be aware that your phone will drain its battery much more quickly. Cell phones boost their transmitting power when they aren't finding cell towers.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Androgynous Cowherd, 24 Jul 2013 @ 12:38pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

            Airplane mode. And don't put it in the fridge; modern fridges are probably more plastic than metal. Put it in the microwave oven. Just don't forget to take it out before actually using the microwave oven as an oven.

            If you put it in airplane mode, turn it off, and cage it and come back to a dead battery, then you have good evidence of phone-home malware having gotten onto the phone and may want to talk to your lawyer as you may have a cause of action.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:42am

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          Then all you have to do is cross and the border into Canada or Mexico and buy one with a removeable battery and bring it back to the USA. Just simply find a place to hide it where Customs will not find it.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2019 @ 2:32pm

        Re: Re: Pull the battery

        Can the battery be tracked?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:01pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      Because we need to stop the terrorists and warrants get in the way of making sure nobody is a terrorist

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:40pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      Or switch phones with someone else and confuse them instead.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 7:32am

        Re: Re: Pull the battery

        i read somewhere once that if you "lose" your cellphone, there is more suspicion placed on you.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      mhab, 23 Jul 2013 @ 6:47pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      It would still be that way if it weren't for that travesty of democracy known as "The Patriot Act"... or should i say:
      The "Patriot" Act

      "Patriotism" is overrated

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ast1, 30 Jul 2013 @ 5:57am

      Re: Pull the battery

      Pull the SIM-Card?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ricky, 18 Aug 2013 @ 8:44am

      Re: Pull the battery

      If you wrap your phone in several layers of foil it wont be able to communicate due to it being in a "faraday cage" .. Just an ifea for iphones. But they may be buffering the captured audio on yhe phone till its on the network then upload it which would make this a bad idea.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      unohoo, 30 Dec 2013 @ 7:33pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      some phones have hidden batteries in them, some have more than one hidden.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        WH, 11 Apr 2017 @ 7:09am

        Re: Re: Pull the battery

        Phones DO NOT have hidden batteries. I take all kinds of phone apart all the time, all components are identifiable

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Franklin Crouch, 2 Oct 2017 @ 6:24am

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          I don't know who this dude is person robot whatever I just pulled apart my ZTE midnight Pro 2 and a sure as shyte stinks,the sky is blue and the fact that I cannot piss over the moon they're being a freaking 202mv/118ma(it was on 20 m on DCA)little button battery about two millimeters across and a millimeter thick...I don't know if it's for CMOS Ram or what and if anything I know about a good old-fashioned James Bond guys over there somewhere in this freaking thing they probably have some kind of Magneto constrictor so they can just do some kind of Tesla crap to it rub their feet together say Alakazam and there you gojust because you think there's a faraday cage around it they might be able to use that damn thing as an antenna to give it power and then he can give some high-pitched chirps to some other damn cell phone etcetera etcetera...and I'd wager that in the end,and I know Heisenberg is cool, just as logic is stupid(ask the newest AI about Occam's razor) that it's all in the Nan's...Can you say rounding toward zero, Infinity positive or infinity negative??? I thought you could...Jesus I wonder what Gouchy('sultimatetheorum)would say about this shyte...

          link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Gabe d., 28 Jul 2019 @ 8:13pm

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          You're so right, i take apart lots of phones, hardly any have a 2nd battery.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          gabe d., 8 Jun 2020 @ 11:19am

          Re: Re: Re: Pull the battery

          EDIT!! yes, SOME DO, most don't. sorry for saying they don't, it was an accident.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Just Visiting, 1 Jan 2014 @ 2:07pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      Well there is at least one spyware out there that claims that the law enforcement community can use your phone even without the battery.

      And before you spout off about how that's all crap...

      For years all the internet know it all's kept saying that they couldn't use your phone to spy on you. Then when that came out those it became "well yeah they can, but just shut it off and problem solved". Then it became "well duh, everyone knows that... Jeez where have you been?"

      So no offense, but I for one am done listening to internet know it all's in comments sections.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Greg R, 16 Sep 2016 @ 6:11pm

      Re: Pull the battery

      Sorry for the late reply but many cellphones now have hidden "spare" batteries. I took a cheap LG apart after watching a video on youtube and there it was just like the guy who posted the video said. It was a small round watch type battery. I snipped the wires and removed it, phone still works fine.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:18pm

    I wonder what the Feds would think if something happened to the phone.

    A few weeks ago, I dropped my phone into the washing machine and totally ruined it. I wonder what the Feds would think if a phone suddenly went off the grid for good, on account of something like that.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 11:57am

      Re:

      they may send a drone - just to be on the safe side - you certainly may be a terrorist

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:19pm

    I don't know exactly how they are doing it, but if you want my opinion, they're probably doing it the same way the UK used to search for unlicensed TVs in the 70's. In which they broadcast a signal and see which receivers "echo" their request. The ones that attenuate the signal a certain way are cell phones, then it's just a matter of filtering out the positive hits from the false-positives. Doesn't exactly mean what kind of cell phones they are, but I doubt the NSA cares as it means there's probably a human nearby them.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:35pm

      Re:

      Actually, fining an unlicensed TV is would not be that difficult.

      Analog TVs emitted a signal at around 38MHz, where you can listen to the sound portion of whatever the TV is tuned to.

      I know, because I did that, as a kid, to get TV after bedtime without my parents ever getting wise to what I was up to. I would turn on the TV in my bedroom and turn down the sound and picture, and simply tune a police band receiver to the right frequency, put on my headphones, and enjoy.

      It is this same method that cable companies likely used to try and catch people stealing pay TV, in the days of analog TVs. Just have a receiver tuned to the right frequency and then just listen in on what people are watching.

      I have no doubt this method was used by East Germany, Cuba, and North Korea to catch people watching Western TV programming, back in the days of analog TV.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2013 @ 2:52am

      Re:

      TV broadcasts don't work that way. The 'detection vans' are bogus.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:24pm

    Putting your phone in the fridge is not going to work. I just tested that now with my phone, and both WiFi and cell signals still got through.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      bla, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:31pm

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24pm

      It's to block sound, not signals

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        blah, 23 Jul 2013 @ 11:39pm

        Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24pm

        His tells me that snowden thinks the spyware on a phone activates when tower signal is lost to record sound of meetings when celltower signal is being intentionally blocked by the owner. Those soujd would be ebroadcast to nsa when phone regains cell tower access.

        Otherwise snowden would simply have people put their phone in a metal cage of some type.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        The Real Michael, 24 Jul 2013 @ 5:19am

        Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24pm

        Isn't there a protective casing which would block out all transmission to and from a cell phone? There should be.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 8:40am

          Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24pm

          Yup,

          Its called a hammer

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      hat_eater, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:34pm

      Re:

      It might have prevented the microphones from picking up anything interesting though.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      twobuck40 (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:59pm

      Re:

      Are you sure? Did you crawl in there with it?

      BTW does the light stay one?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      aerilus, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:54pm

      Re:

      probably more of a sound proof thing

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2013 @ 1:00am

      Re:

      I wonder if wrapping it in tinfoil works!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      nik, 6 Nov 2013 @ 2:39am

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24pm

      Just put it in the microwave! DONT turn the microwave on coz u will have a well baked mobile! Remember that microwaves prevent the waves of escaping.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2014 @ 6:19am

      Re:

      great, soo your wi fi and cell signal still got thru the fridge, huh? I'm pretty sure Snowden said "power off your phone THEN put it in the fridge" probably because the fridge acted more like a soundproof booth than a signal blocker. BTW is your fridge made in Asia?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    TasMot (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:39pm

    Well That Certainly Explains the "No Rooting" Stance

    With the DMCA, no one is allowed to "root" their phone and take control away from the provider. No wonder AT&T and Verizon fight that so much. They would lose all that free money coming their way from the government to put spyware on everybody's phone. It's a WIN-WIN for the government and the cell phone company. Who cares if the citizens and customers lose out. They're not supposed to know what's going on. Once the phones are rooted, though, some folks are going to notice the malware and take it out.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:45pm

      Re: Well That Certainly Explains the "No Rooting" Stance

      The crminal anti-cirvumvention statues only apply to those who do it to make money.

      In order for a felony conviction to stick under the law, they would have to prove that it was done for "commerical or private financial gain", and rooting/jailbreaking a phone for one's own personal use does would not be covered by that.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        R.H. (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 6:35pm

        Re: Re: Well That Certainly Explains the "No Rooting" Stance

        It's still an issue since there are a number of people who've had me root their phones for them since they don't understand how to do it but they do want to get rid of some of the otherwise irremovable(sp?) crap-ware on the thing. Since I've never asked for any money I'm pretty sure that I'm still fine doing it but, if they own the device, why should the government care what they have done to it?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      govtfreephones, 15 Dec 2013 @ 1:45am

      Re: Well That Certainly Explains the

      Imagine those who applied for the free govt cell phones..there is definatley spyware on those phones as well as the msid doesn't match ur number. No such thing as a free lunch.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Rezzy, 28 Dec 2013 @ 5:13pm

      Re: Well That Certainly Explains the

      Read up..DMCA deemed it legal to root/jailbreak your phones. Some reason not tablets though. Just phones purchased after January ?? 2013 cannot be legally unlocked to use on a different carrier without permission from your current carrier.

      My theory is I'm paid for the damn thing with my money so who's to say i can't do as I please with it? It's like buying a car but the dealer tells you that you can't put seat covers on... Doesn't make sense

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jed Clampert, 27 May 2014 @ 1:13pm

      Re: Well That Certainly Explains the "No Rooting" Stance

      Trust me when I say the NSA can put malicious software on a rooted phone. All that means is they might have one or two extra steps to infect a rooted phone.

      REMOVE BATTERY

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:50pm

    There is in fact a second battery in every phone. Similar to the motherboard battery found on computers that keep your bios settings should you lose power. It wouldn't surprised me if the NSA could make use of said batteries to track your phone even with the regular battery removed.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 8:43pm

      Re:

      If they started doing that, you could then wrap your phone in tinfoil, to prevent any signals from getting in or out.

      I read sometime back that criminals who are required to wear GPS ankle bracelets do this to keep the device from getting the GPS signal.

      Using tinfoil to defeat government tracking is not against any current law.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Disgusted, 23 Jul 2013 @ 9:04pm

        Re: Re:

        "Using tinfoil to defeat government tracking is not against any current law."

        Thank you. Now some idiot in Washington is going to propose a law to do just that!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 2:41am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That would be very hard to enforce. They would have to totally ban the sale of aluminum foil to achieve that.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 7:28am

      Re:

      That is the RTC battery. Its only purpose is to keep the time even when the phone is powered off, or main battery has been removed. A few budget phones do not have a RTC battery, and have to set the time every time their main battery is removed and replaced, or even every time they are turned off.

      The RTC battery cannot be used for tracking. First, it is connected only to the RTC circuitry, and not to the radios, the CPU, or the audio codec. Second, it is designed for very low power use; using it for anything other than powering the RTC would drain it quickly, and it is not rechargeable.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 11:06am

        Re: Re:

        Depends on the phone. My old Samsung Admmire that got dropped into the washing machine did not have a backup battery, but my ZTE phone, which replaced it, does.

        So, if you can get an older phone, such as the Samsung Admire, such a backup battery is not there, and you can defeat government snooping by removing the battery.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        anonymous coward, 5 Jul 2015 @ 12:35pm

        Re: Re:

        non chargeable batts need replaced. that is when they would reveal themselves. no the backup maybe a supercapacitor charged by solarvoltaic cell behind screen

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      aldestrawk (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 8:49am

      Re:

      It used to be that PC motherboards used CMOS based non-volatile memory to store the BIOS configuration. This is no longer true. BIOS configuration is now stored in EEPROM or FLASH memory. In PCs the coin battery is still there to power the real-time clock. I am not sure why a cell phone would require a real-time clock as NTP (Network Time Protocol) can be used instead for . It may be required for a GPS unit where high accuracy is needed. In that case, only phones with GPS should need a secondary coin battery.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ed, 1 Jan 2014 @ 12:47pm

      Response to: Mike on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 3:50pm

      You are correct. That battery actually provides enough power to the GPS funtion to track you.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Gabe s., 28 Jul 2019 @ 8:10pm

      Re: "there is in fact a second battery in every phone"

      That is no where near true. Hardly any have yhat, except zte's, lg xpression, motorola atrix.
      Which models did you have in mind ?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 3:57pm

    Well after all the NSA shit it's obvious why they gave every single person a fucking Obama phone.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:07pm

    I know there is definitely a second battery in my Galaxy T989. I broke the glass and took apart the entire phone to replace it. Upon doing so I discovered a second tiny battery inside. After searching StartPage about said battery, I found many "conspirators" talking about finding these batteries in their phones as well.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 6:36pm

      Re:

      battery backed RAM, look it up, your phone has data stored on ROM (Read only memory) and retains it's data when power is turned off, also data is stored in RAM (Random Access Memory) that requires a very small current to HOLD that data when your phone is OFF. But not enough power to drive the RAM I/O circuits (that is the phone main power).

      So the tiny battery keeps the data in your RAM intact, but does not supply enough power to read that data. Your phone is OFF.

      But go ahead, it's more amusing to watch you paranoid tin foil ass hats, carrying on like 3 year olds..

      You claim you 'know' technology, you idiots don't have a fucking clue..

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Mike, 23 Jul 2013 @ 8:16pm

        Re: Re:

        I didn't claim to "know" technology. I stated that I discovered a secondary battery in my phone similar to those found on conventional motherboards. While I am aware how a motherboard on a desktop computer functions, we are all clearly unaware how our government takes advantage of our technology.

        Try to maintain your composure in future posts.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Battery, 22 Dec 2013 @ 11:23pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          This small battery is used for powering phone clock, and, maybe, for preservation of some data. It has not enough power to turn on any transmitting equipment, not speaking about transmitting something through it....

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        JMT (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 11:03pm

        Re: Re:

        "You claim you 'know' technology, you idiots don't have a fucking clue."

        Nothing you've said proves you have any more of a fucking clue than us idiots. You sound a lot more like an idiot than most here however.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 11:22pm

        Re: Re:

        The ram refresh signal may be what they are tuning into. DRAM needs to refresh to keep the memory intact. It might create a recognizable signature.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        aldestrawk (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 1:46am

        Re: Re:

        It seems your understanding of the technology is also flawed.

        A lot of people commonly refer to ROM in cell phones but they are really using it as a lazy abbreviation for non-volatile memory. ROM, more precisely, cannot be written to after it has been programmed a single time. Cell phones use FLASH memory, and sometimes EEPROM as well, that can be re-written and does not require a battery to maintain memory contents. NOR FLASH has been used to store executable code as it is byte accessible and can execute code in place. However, the use of NOR FLASH is declining as NAND FLASH had been improved so that it can emulate NOR capabilities. NAND FLASH is used to store; firmware, OS code, configuration, application code and data, SMS messages, photos, and video. User generated data can be stored on FLASH based media cards if the phone has connections for one.

        You seem to be confusing Static RAM (SRAM) and Dynamic RAM (DRAM). Both types are used in cell phones. DRAM is cheaper than SRAM and is used whenever access speed is not a critical factor. DRAM is not usable as non-volatile memory. The data contained in DRAM is lost when the chip has no power. There is no battery backup.
        SRAM is used when faster memory is needed and to reduce power consumption. The SRAM memory in the cell phone is primarily used to store frequently accessed data and temporary variables generated by the baseband processing ASIC and for cache used by the CPU. When not in active use (standby mode), the contents are maintained with a very small amount of current. There is no battery backup to maintain contents while the phone is turned off.

        I am not a cell phone expert but, apparently, a small coin battery is used to power the internal clock chip on the phone. I looked this up and I must say it is suspicious that the same text appears in innumerable web-sites. At any rate, such a battery cannot be used to power all the circuitry in the phone.

        So, the question remains. Is the "off" setting on, at least some, phones a software, low power, setting or is everything really powered off. The NSA trick apparently requires "malware" to spoof the off setting while keeping the phone at least partially on.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 11:02am

        Re: Re:

        you cant power a circuitboard and a long range antenna with power used for a single low frequency, you are a fucking retard.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Laurie Chmiel, 22 Jan 2014 @ 11:40pm

        us idiots with no clue

        I'm glad you knew everything way back then. But everything has changed, and now you look like an idiot. do you think Bad bios is not possible, too? If you are in security, you need to keep up. Jacob Applebaum has some videos on YouTube. find them and listen carefully. Faraday is the only way, so far. tomorrow? we'll fight their next attack. and the next.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Coward, 3 Nov 2016 @ 11:29am

      Re:

      Topkek

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Coward, 3 Nov 2016 @ 11:29am

      Re:

      Topkek

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:16pm

    As the anonymous coward above me posted - Faraday cages for the win.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 4:25pm

    We need a Raspberry Pi smartphone. I'm sure the US Gov. will do everything in their power to outlaw a FOSS Phone (Free Open Source Software).

    They'll say FOSS Phones are illegal, because they can't 'legally' spy on us, even though it's illegal under the Constitution.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:41am

      Re:

      Then you simply ignore the law, and import and FOSS phone anyway.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 5:24pm

    Another day, another story that makes me glad I run CyanogenMod on my smartphone instead of the OS Verizon put on it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    mvario (profile), 23 Jul 2013 @ 5:54pm

    Regarding the capture of geolocation data

    Regarding the capture of geolocation data, according to The Atlantic article (http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/07/nsa-admits-it-analyzes-more-peoples-data-previously -revealed/67287/) with a quote from NSA Deputy Director Chris Inglis, "We are not collecting that data, under this program."

    The weasel-words phrase is of course, "under this program". Given the track record of NSA statements and their relation to the truth you can interpret this as you will.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 6:48pm

    probably had some bearing on Snowden's request that journalists power down their phones and place them in the fridge.


    So, if Snowden is the amazing tech expert as you claim, why is he saying put the phone in the fridge, a fridge is not an effective faraday cage (as someone here has found out).

    Putting a turned on phone in the fridge will NOT stop it from talking to a tower.

    Signals would enter the fridge through the seals and so on.

    Wrap it in foil, and place it in a tin car, like a biscuit tin, that might work..

    Or just stop being so paranoid, and stupid.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Mike, 23 Jul 2013 @ 8:01pm

      Re:

      Clearly placing a phone in a fridge is a convenient way to prevent eavesdropping on conversations (prevent the mic from "hearing"). It is not meant to block the phone's signal.

      Think before you rant.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 7:40am

      Re:

      maybe if the cell loses the towers is when the special spyware kicks in. so he masks the sound with the fridge. maybe they generate some kind of weird hiss/humm when close?

      maybe, rather than wrapping in tin foil...just leave it in the car.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        freegovt phones, 15 Dec 2013 @ 2:01am

        Re: Re:

        I noticed when I leave my cell phone in the car, it's dead cold. When I bring it in the house it gets really hot...hmmm at it's best.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Trish, 25 Jul 2013 @ 11:13am

      Re:

      The only stupid one here is you. Had you read a little further down before commenting, you'd realize it had nothing to do with the signal and everything to do with whatever 'sound' the phones could capture.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      undisclosed recipient, 16 Feb 2014 @ 8:07am

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 23rd, 2013 @ 6:48pm

      The fridge was not intended tasbe used as a Faraday cage, more specifically, as a soundproof enclosure to prevent the phones microphones from picking up sound

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 7:06pm

    You can remotely turn phones on

    I work for a transportation company, and I know first hand that if you can get software installed on a phone turning it off does not stop all communication to the phone.

    Just over three years ago we installed a program on our company issued cell phones that our drivers used during the daytime. The software we were running was still very new and under development. For the first three months we had the power to remotely turn phones back on and do anything we wanted with the phone. Those features were removed from the program because too many concerns were raised about the fact that we had no idea if the person was in a situation were phones were prohibited (getting on a plane, in a hospital, etc...).

    PS Just so you know we weren't trying to be total Big Brother. The phones were only supposed to be used while on duty and then left at our facilities on the chargers overnight.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Fat Hillary, 23 Jul 2013 @ 7:23pm

    Cell phones

    Placing your phone in a Farraday Cage(metal box,Mylar Bag,etc blocks ALL signals...FYI

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2013 @ 7:41pm

      Re: Cell phones

      Tin foil - remember, shiny side out

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        aldestrawk (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 1:53am

        Re: Re: Cell phones

        Shiny side out so it looks nicer?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 4:55am

          Re: Re: Re: Cell phones

          It's an old joke, originating with the tinfoil hat craze.
          Funny how it doesn't sound so crazy anymore.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            That One Guy (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 9:06am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Cell phones

            Does it still count as paranoia if there's good evidence that 'they' really are watching you?

            link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Nov 2013 @ 1:11am

        Re: Re: Cell phones

        No, shiny side in. You want to stop signals from the phone to the NSA, doesn't matter if signals reach the phone.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      blah, 23 Jul 2013 @ 11:36pm

      Re: Cell phones

      But a faraday doesn't block sound. So all NSA has to do is install spyware which says " whenever on but tower signal blocked, record sound. Then retransmit sound data when tower access returns."

      In fact in most cases in urban settings , having the phone lose tower signal would mean intentional blocking and thus indicate something sneaky going on so best time to record!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Niall (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 5:21am

        Re: Re: Cell phones

        You've never been in an old apartment or large building that acts as a Faraday cage, have you? A lot of people in urban environments have very poor signal indoors, enough to render it non-obvious unless a specific person is known to normally have good signal indoors.

        It can also vary widely with carrier.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:52am

          Re: Re: Re: Cell phones

          This. In my urban apartment, I get no cell signal whatsoever (but full bars in the parking lot out front).

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:39am

        Re: Re: Cell phones

        Then hackers will find a way to find and eliminate that spyware from phones.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Disgusted, 23 Jul 2013 @ 8:42pm

    Actually, the problem revolves around the entire concept of the "Smart Phone". First off, most people DON'T NEED ONE. They're nice, and convenient, I grant you, but they're TOO SMART. You don't NEED the equivalent of a 5 year old desktop computer in your pocket to make a few calls. You don't NEED internet access in your phone. You don't NEED the $100+ per month charges. You don't NEED a device with the ability to monitor your every move and word. You don't NEED the $2500+ total cost of that fancy phone over the 2 year contract period. I would suggest we return to the old, reliable feature-phone, perhaps with a QWERTY keyboard for texting, and maybe a camera, but with a removable battery. None of us, except maybe some corporate customers, have any real need for a "smart phone" in any form.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2013 @ 7:09am

      Re:

      No, I don't *need* internet access or an easy on-screen keyboard for my phone.

      It sure is nice to have, though.

      Also, your prices are *way* off. My phone was $550 (I bought a fairly expensive phone).
      I'm currently paying ~$60 (with fees - it's a little less but let's keep it to round numbers) per month for unlimited minutes, unlimited texting, and limited web (which gets me all the web I need unless I decide to stream Pandora or Youtube a lot). I've been paying roughly that much (within $5) of that price since I got the phone a bit over three years ago, so that's a good number to go with for a decent smart phone plan cost.
      I also don't have a contract. Never have; there's really no reason to (if you can't buy your phone outright, talk to the phone company about a purchase plan for it; that won't necessarily bind you to a contract for the minutes/text/web plan).

      So my phone plus the plan will, over two years, cost $1990 - far less than the $2500 you are quoting for the phone alone. In fact, that means that my average monthly price including the phone cost is $82, if I prorate it over 2 years.
      My phone is more than three years old now and functioning quite well, which lowers the average price even more.

      Those are accurate numbers - slightly overstated for purposes of easy calculation, but accurate.

      As for the price of the basic phone? Well, there really aren't many cheaper plans nowadays. So all you're (probably) saving is the cheaper phone price. That is something, at least when you compare it to a relatively high-end smartphone like the one I have.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        unohoo, 30 Dec 2013 @ 7:40pm

        Re: Re:

        For someone who identifies him self as an "Anonymous Coward" you sure do have a lot to say about other peoples comments, seems like you don't have any original thought of your own.
        If I were so simple as you . . . I would want to be an Anonymous Coward too.

        Get a real life . . . and stop tapping in on someone else. After all isn't that what the subject line is all about: People like you . . .

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:53am

      Re:

      You don't NEED the equivalent of a 5 year old desktop computer in your pocket to make a few calls.


      True. I rarely actually make calls with my smartphone.

      But the rest of the capabilities are so incredibly useful that it's worth having.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Disgusted, 23 Jul 2013 @ 8:58pm

    Product Idea

    A small, RF tight, maybe foam lined, metal box - Faraday Cage. Think souped up Altoids box big enough for a phone or tablet. The RF tight parameter is required, so all metal surfaces between the base and cover need to be clean to allow good electrical contact. Gold plated fingers on the base might be required. Finished price should be in the $20 range.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      aldestrawk (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 1:51am

      Re: Product Idea

      Why not just a mylar bag. It would be much cheaper and just as effective.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 9:05am

      Re: Product Idea

      Sounds like a good kickstarter project to me, and if nothing else it would be funny to watch all the various spy agencies freak out over a simple sound-proof, signal blocking cell phone case that was cheap enough for everyone to get.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    davnel, 23 Jul 2013 @ 9:16pm

    So Test The Theory

    Needed: one large, real, Faraday cage. One broadband spectrum analyzer with data storage capability. Place phone (with battery removed) and spectrum analyzer in cage. Monitor for 24 hours. Look for microburst communication attempts. A microburst is a short period (milliseconds or microseconds long) data burst. IF the unit is using the backup battery to power communications, it can only do so by charging a capacitor and using that charge to power a very short burst occasionally.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      streetlight (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 11:29am

      Re: So Test The Theory

      Why is something this complicated necessary. Put the phone in your Faraday cage and give it a call and listen for a ring tone. If you can't hear the ring, put a small micro cassette recorder or other sound recording device in the cage. Presumably if the phone can't ring it's not connected to a tower. Not sure about GPS.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Larry, 23 Jul 2013 @ 9:18pm

    block the phone

    Wrap it in aluminum foil then try to call yourself. Not a long term solution but a start

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      freegovtphones, 15 Dec 2013 @ 1:51am

      Re: block the phone

      I used to live in federal subsidized housing and I remember my neighbor had tin foil covering all windows not until she was asked to remove it. She told me it was to divert transmission of communication from her apt. I thought it was a farce. She argued with management that it was to cool her apt. Years later It was proven they were monitoring their tenants.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jeffrey Nonken (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 12:08am

    Me, I'd pull the battery out. Like to see it spy on me with no fricken power.

    Fridge better for muffling sound, but the microwave oven is a faraday cage. When in doubt, also wrap in aluminum foil.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Fat Hillary, 24 Jul 2013 @ 12:19am

    Signals

    I purchased a mylar bag for another purpose and decided to try signal blocking for anti-tracking testing....works great...I know it wont block sound but I never talk around my phone anyway,just on GP's....using the microwave to block signals when you are at home seems redundant but there is no harm in it either

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ron Hunter, 24 Jul 2013 @ 3:36am

    Turned off cell phones

    Smartphones are not really turned off, as very few have true on/off switches. However, it should be quite easy to determine if a smartphone is still radiating in the radio spectrum. Surely terrorists are smart enough to employ basic technology to detect any radio signal from their phones.
    If the NSA wants to know where I am, that's OK by me. Hope they don't get too bored with my conversations, and travels. Maybe they can enjoy my pictures...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 10:18am

    Wait, people didn't know this already?

    It's very well known within security circles that this is done, and has been done for years. The mechanism isn't even that difficult. You only have two options if you want to avoid being tracked and eavesdropped on by your cell phone: don't carry it, or remove the battery.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Cloudsplitter, 24 Jul 2013 @ 1:51pm

    The secret to going dark is randomization, what you need from a cell phone is voice, and text, everything else is a gift or a curse. Buy cheap pay as you go phones, at the lowest price you can find them. Charge the batteries. then pull them. Buy the minimum phone card needed, normally enough time comes with phone to set it up, 10 minutes or so. When you need to call or text, install battery, register phone to get a phone number, add phone card minutes, uses phone, pull battery and destroy phone. This way you use the phone as a one time pad, and then its gone. Carrying a smart phone when you are running is a bad idea, anytime you power it up, by reinstalling battery, it will location echo you. If you can not pull the battery, do not buy it. If you need to store numbers or other data buy a cheap wifi tablet and put data on removable chip, or memory stick if there is USB access, Say what you will, the Feds still need our cooperation, and acquiescence to spy on us, Stop Cooperating. If you learn to read a paper map, GPS is one less thing you have to worry about. A free man learns, to think like a Guerrilla.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 24 Jul 2013 @ 2:37pm

      Re:

      In other words, do what drug dealers, terrorists, and spies do with regards to cell phones. That this is standard practice is further evidence that what the NSA is up to has little, if anything, to do with catching actual terrorists.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Viatcheslav I Sobol, 25 Jul 2013 @ 12:24am

      Response to: Cloudsplitter on Jul 24th, 2013 @ 1:51pm

      Cloudsplitter. You are one funny BS spitter. First at all, the battery pulled out of the cell phone does not prevent tracking for several days because of electrical circuits serving as charge capacity retention function. Second if you were of any interest to be worthy of surveillance once you speak every voice is digitally fingerprinted and NSA has more than enough computer power to find whomever they want as soon as start talking on the phone instantly. Third, every person walks differently, literally and once your particular rear end shifting in motion pattern is established then it is useless to change any phones. Save your money, bug the tree, recycle an old phone, buy the replacement, stimulate by consuming corporate profitability. -:)Most importantly, if people behave evasively then there are even more intrusive methods to exercise individuals scrutiny.

      Whom are you fighting? Your own government? Nobody gives a damn about you or me. There are more pressing issues to attend than entertaining the shopkeepers with your cave dwelling lifestyle, obsessing about non existent privacy illusion while crapping in the glass booth. Welcome to America in 2013 reality.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 25 Jul 2013 @ 11:06am

        Re: Response to: Cloudsplitter on Jul 24th, 2013 @ 1:51pm

        First at all, the battery pulled out of the cell phone does not prevent tracking for several days because of electrical circuits serving as charge capacity retention function.


        I'm 90% sure this isn't actually true.

        Second if you were of any interest to be worthy of surveillance once you speak every voice is digitally fingerprinted and NSA has more than enough computer power to find whomever they want as soon as start talking on the phone instantly.


        This isn't true, at least not with anything like accuracy. Identifying someone by "voiceprint" is highly inaccurate under the best of circumstances.

        Third, every person walks differently, literally and once your particular rear end shifting in motion pattern is established then it is useless to change any phones.


        This comment confuses me. Do you mean once they've caught you on video, they can identify you again on video? What does that have to do with cell phones?

        Most importantly, if people behave evasively then there are even more intrusive methods to exercise individuals scrutiny.


        True, and if they want to do surveillance, then they should be limited to the more intrusive methods. It would reduce the amount of unwarranted surveillance they do by quite a lot.

        Whom are you fighting? Your own government?


        No, the bastards who have taken over my government.

        Welcome to America in 2013 reality.


        I see, so your response is "suck it up, buttercup, there's nothing you can do. Just give up and bend over."? I think we can do a lot better than pure defeatism.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        YouDontNeedToKnow, 11 Jun 2014 @ 11:36am

        Re: Response to: Cloudsplitter on Jul 24th, 2013 @ 1:51pm

        Viatcheslav, I'm being targeted. I know that for a fact because I've heard my conversations repeated almost verbatim by a members of a particular group. I've also had interruptions on my phone(voices/music come in on my line). I don't know if the Canadian Gov't (I live in Canada), knows about this.
        I changed my service provider, and my previous phone wasn't even a smart phone, yet I was bugged, still am. I take the batteries out to prevent or stop the headaches I get from the signals. But I miss a lot of calls...

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2018 @ 10:22pm

        Re: Response to: Cloudsplitter on Jul 24th, 2013 @ 1:51pm

        While capacitance is a thing if they can contain enough charge for that in cell phones we would be using cell phones arrays as supercapicators.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DeathPenalty, 4 Jan 2014 @ 1:59pm

      Re: Secret to Going Dark

      Howdy guys and gals, its certainly an interesting topic and its great to read so many people's ideas and theories. For mine you have to go back to the eggs, flour and sugar of that tasty cake. So when we look at how we get spied on in my view it comes down to these things:
      1. As far as im aware spyware is a program not something physical but purely software, this must attach onto the IMEI of a phone i believe so it knows what its recording, tracking etc. Getting programs to roll IMEI's isnt hard, it can be done automatically or manually.
      2. When tracing or tracking a phone, its either jumping on the back of the PHONE which is the IMEI, or its jumping on the SIM card or phone number attached. So if you get a phone which can roll its IMEI and have maybe 10 sim cards and rotate them then it in my view takes care of that 2nd problem.
      3. Now another problem is if someone installs something physical on your phone, in this day and age if that happens then ur screwed until you physically remove it, and its kinda your own fault for leaving ya phone lying around people u dont really know. So physically on means only way is physically off.
      4. If you have spyware on your phone and you roll the IMEI then the spyware cant find its target anymore, but that doesnt mean more spyware cant be remotely installed thru sms or terrible thing called Bluetooth.
      5. Viruses can also attack and damage your phone and open up holes for spyware to get through more easily.

      So heres my solution, wether it works or not is another story, but its my opinion and im happy to share it with fellow privacy concerned people:

      BEFORE YOU MAKE A CALL OR SMS:
      1. Scan your phone with anti spyware program.
      2. Then Scan phone with anti virus program
      3. Enter in a new IMEI
      4. Insert a new SIM card
      5. This is important: the person on the other phone must also follow these 4steps.

      I also strongly agree with the people who say that going back to NOKIA 5110's or basically old school phones makes the NSA and other MOFO corporations jobs at being up our butts wid torches a whole lot harder.

      Before i go i just wanna say, that as a people we are lazy and want things easy, everything easy is digital or mechanical, well one day my belief is the powers gonna go out, and 90% of us are gonna die because we dont know how to survive with Watts or Ohms. The nomads or bushmen will once again be the sole survivors when we well our great grandchildren fuck this planet beyond hope.

      Just look at the way the governments are getting us to hand over our lives, its like being robbed and the robber just has to say, well if u give me your purse then u wont have all that extra weight to carry around, and us without thinking we just hand it over.

      Look at technology:
      1. before u had to buy a bus ticket, now u just swipe a card or a phone and ur on, but guess what that digital card or phone says who ur, where u got on, what time u got on the bus, when u got off etc.
      2. We transfer money online, go to atms, everything involves a machine, these machines are screwing us, yeh its easy to use, i love my technology, but to be real cautious when i need to i go old school. face to face meetings. send someone in to buy a PREPAID VISA/MASTERCARD they r a god send, buy a laptop and tape the camera and micropohne or get an IBM thinkpad which doesnt hava camera, register a usb modem in a fake name, same fake name as ya prepaid visa, the computers IP isnt attached to you its attached to the dude that bought it, and he shouldnt remember you, u paid cash bcoz u bought it outta the newspaper, u buy ya internet usb ya mobile all from 2nd hand garage sales or newspaper ads, all cash all untraceable. Trust me the things ive done in the Past ive needed to be damn well anonymous and i was, and never got caught.

      IN CONCLUSION ITS ALL OUT THERE PEOPLE, THE OLD AND THE NEW, HEY ENJOY TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BENEFITS THE FUN, THE REALISM, THE ENTERTAINMENT, BUT WHEN U NEED TO GO UNDERCOVER THEN GO OLD SKOOL BROTHER ;-)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    gnudist, 24 Jul 2013 @ 4:58pm

    To many this was a shock, to richard stallman it was old news

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    dmitryb, 25 Jul 2013 @ 6:15pm

    "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is"

    So what's the definition of "Powering Down?"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2013 @ 5:30am

    And this is why the Elite removes the batteries before meetings.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2013 @ 5:32am

    Please fund the Ubuntu Edge campaign. A phone with an Open Source OS, without spyware, malware, virus.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    curmudgeoninchief, 26 Jul 2013 @ 8:28am

    Take It Out

    You have to take out either the SIM Card or the battery. That's the only way to "turn off" your phone.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Aug 2013 @ 4:01pm

    I had a wicked experience, late 2010, where i got a call, answered it, and it sounded like a fax coming in. I couldn't power off or hang up, abd I saw the gps icon on. I opened it and pulled the battery out. Thus began a nervous breakdown. Fearing pulling the battery was not sufficient, I threw the phone in a pond. All that for visiting sites like this and commenting. When i calmed down and tried to tell people what had happened they called me bonkers. Vindication. is sweet. Error on the sidevof caution; pull the battery and insert in fridge, or its equivalent.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      freegovtphones, 15 Dec 2013 @ 2:07am

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 11th, 2013 @ 4:01pm

      I received a call that I didn't know, they didn't say anything next thing u knew my phone started acting up..thanks for the heads up

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    michael keenan, 14 Aug 2013 @ 10:46pm

    cell phone analysis

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Roygbiv, 23 Sep 2013 @ 6:24pm

    On when off

    An 'off' cell phone can not transmit. A phone with malware can simulate being off, and still transmit.

    Battery which stores ROM does not have enough power to teansmit

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Short aus, 22 Oct 2013 @ 8:40pm

    Okay so what happens if someone like me who has an iPhone can't turn it off? Like I power it down, but it turns straight back on. Battery turns off at 7% and the phone will reboot at about 4%. It then will last forever sometimes before it finally shuts down.
    What's the go with that? It never used to do it

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Guest, 8 Nov 2013 @ 2:47pm

    Simple Solution

    Okay you big smart people. The easiest and only true sure means is ..... TO DITCH THE CELL PHONE COMPLETELY.

    Duh

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    A Person you don't know, 15 Dec 2013 @ 12:15am

    NSA spying.

    Just take a piece of painters tape and place it over the camera on both sides of your phone. They wont be able to see shit. As for the audio...still working on that. Lol so far im just leaving it in a room thats rarely occupied.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    quiet girl, 15 Dec 2013 @ 11:20am

    NSA Spying

    If you place your phone into a tin, like a candy tin or an old lunchbox or a cookie tin (not a jar! Has to be made of tin) it cant read any signals. ;-)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ralph Mills, 28 Dec 2013 @ 12:01pm

    Tracking Cell Phones

    So, why doesn't the cell phone manufacturing community begin making phone with a battery on-off switch. With no battery, no tracking is possible, I understand.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    shelly, 25 Feb 2014 @ 4:06am

    please help

    I have lost and been taken addvanage of. Usely someone has like my betyet thsn better than I did. I jus need help so bad.way s

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    anonymous, 1 Mar 2014 @ 7:06am

    What about "dumb phones" does it apply to them too ?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      VforVendetta, 28 May 2014 @ 5:57pm

      Re: dumb phones

      Yes, they can be listened in on and tracked, however tinfoil blocks all signals

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    VforVendetta, 28 May 2014 @ 5:56pm

    I can't believe it, the tinfoil thing worked! I just tried it, it's incredible.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jofess, 9 Jun 2014 @ 7:10am

    Like someone up page said...remove battery AND SIM!!! And if you must have your phone on while having an interesting conversation with folk, TURN THE RADIO OR MP3 PLAYER ON AND PUT IT IN YOUR BACK POCKET MICROPHONE FACING YOUR ARSEFOR OCCASIONAL ADDED SOUND EFFECTS!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2014 @ 7:15am

    I loved that rant at "Anonymous Coward" further up. It would appear that Anonymous Coward is a nic attatched to ALL COMMENTS that dont give email or name....much like this one. What a dummy!!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    jayram1408 (profile), 20 Jul 2014 @ 7:30pm

    NSA tracking cell phones.

    The rest of the criminal has been aware of this for some time now. The answer is so simple. YOU TAKE THE BATTERY OUT

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Richard, 26 Aug 2014 @ 2:56pm

    Cell Phone Tracking

    NSA may not be the only agency tracking your phone. DEA, FBI, Homeland security. If the battery goes from a full charge to empty in a day and there's been min usage your phone maybe tracked and someone is listening in on your conversations. Even when you're not on cell phone. If you see the GPS icon flashing when you have your GPS in the off condition you are being tracked. So why are you being tracked and hacked. There are hundreds of thousands of agents in the US and God only knows what they are doing. I suspect like most goverment agencies they have nothing to do and there's little or no oversight. They still don't share information between agencies. I have reason to believe many of these people are out of control. If you are being tracked your first clue is your phone won't turn off or the battery runs down quickly. Remove the battery. This will kill any tracking and hacking activities. If you have to have your phone on all the time be sure to install and use a music program like Pandora. Leave it on all the time. This gives the hacker something to listen to other than your private conversations. The same is true if listening devices have been planted in your home or office. It will drive them crazy.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike, 24 Oct 2014 @ 6:21pm

    tracking phones

    What to do when you have a Google Nexus which doesn't allow the battery to be removed? Can't even remove the back of the phone without voiding the warranty...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mmunir, 30 Nov 2015 @ 11:38pm

    Lost ipad

    I Wont NSA to locate my ipad and when i tried find my iphone app it say offline. So i wont Nsa to locate my ipad but how i will contact them

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    kamrhan, 26 Feb 2016 @ 4:21pm

    hope it will find my phone

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ella, 26 May 2016 @ 4:33am

    Terrorism is a red herring

    Non removable batteries both assists the Surveillance State and the smartphone manufacturers by forcing the technology to become disposable and thus increase turnover. In an era where governments lecture populations re recycling and environmental awareness, this exemption for smartphones stands out as being inconstant and hypocritical.

    I would rather go without than buy a smartphone with a non removable battery. It smacks of environmental waste and decadence and is akin to buying a laptop designed with a maximum user life of no more than 2 years.

    The Surveillance State exists to monitor Working Class dissent. That's its main purpose. Terrorism is a red herring.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ella, 26 May 2016 @ 5:00am

    Terrorism is a red herring

    Non removable batteries both assists the Surveillance State and the smartphone manufacturers by forcing the technology to become disposable and thus increase turnover. In an era where governments lecture populations re recycling and environmental awareness, this exemption for smartphones stands out as being inconsistent and hypocritical.

    I would rather go without than buy a smartphone with a non removable battery. It smacks of environmental waste and decadence and is akin to buying a laptop designed with a maximum user life of no more than 2 years.

    The Surveillance State exists to monitor Working Class dissent. That's its main purpose. Terrorism is a red herring.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 May 2016 @ 12:10am

    backscatter

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Franklin Crouch, 2 Oct 2017 @ 6:47am

    WTF

    the old question if a tree falls in the deep forest with no one's around does it make a sound f*** yes it does motherfuking trees alive just because we move fast and they move slow doesn't mean they aren't cogent hell even smarter than we are like a damn physarium polycephalum...and if you check "Frankapaedia" (lol) under "is what it iz" to be, or not to be??? Nay i sai...To be AND not- that is THE™®©€÷√*$8;>℅. Laitmhynikkaz

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.