Worst Woman In The World Burns Dog Alive, Is Caught After Bragging About It On Facebook
from the i-hate-you dept
Normally when we write up posts discussing idiot criminals and their internet exploits, they're a bit of levity in an otherwise maddening world. Whether they're taunting law enformcement or posting pictures of the meals they're eating with the feds, their stupidity is typically enjoyable. This is not one of those stories. Instead, this is a story about a stupid criminal who may well be the worst woman currently in existence.
Adrienne Martin was apparently taking care of her sister-in-law's dog. Claiming the dog had acted aggressively, she chained the animal in the backyard and lit it on fire. The dog died shortly after it was found and taken to a stray rescue. Then Martin did what any psychopath would do: bragged about it on Facebook.
Martin, who has been charged with felony animal abuse, reportedly said on Facebook, “I’m on killa mode… kill dogs… today. I mean what I say and I say what I mean… all dogs don’t go to heaven.”Martin is the kind of person that makes people hope there's a Hell to which she may eventually retire. The cruelty is obviously astounding as is her depraved commentary on her social media page. Thankfully, those investigating her crime were tipped to her comments and she's been arrested and charged with two felonies.
So, while I typically mock dumb criminals for posting about their exploits, I want to thank Ms. Martin for doing so in this case. Any action that expedites the stripping of your freedom is good in my book.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: criminals, dogs, social media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How old are you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Would never suggest such a thing would or should be done of course, even if the woman does deeply deserve punishment for her inhuman actions(let the system take care of her, anyone but Cruela DeVille is liable to throw her away for as long as possible given the crime and the attitude she showed towards it), but wouldn't exactly be shedding many tears if I heard about it either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"they're stupidity is typically enjoyable." -- If only yours were, Timmy.
Anyhoo, disagree with your take; counter-examples are not too difficult to find. I'd say any of these women are actually worse:
"Some wealthy Manhattan moms have figured out a way to cut the long lines at Disney World � by hiring disabled people to pose as family members so they and their kids can jump to the front, The Post has learned."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/disney_world_srich_kid_outrage_zTBA0xrvZRkIV c1zItXGDP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
Are you people always anonymous because you have nothing to say,m or because you're embarrassed to have any handle associated with the rubbish you type?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
yes it is..
Masnick calls it censorship if some other group or web site do it..
So on this I agree with Masnick it's censorship, by his standards, and by mine. And by everyone else who sees it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
This is Masnick talking about 'filtering' he is calling it censorship, saying that even if something is available, and even if it is "opt-in" it's STILL CENSORSHIP.
Now reporting a comment is also censorship, it's also 'opt-in', it's a road block to free speech..
you need more citations ??
that one is enough..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
Citation needed. Hint: trying to shut down an entire site or removing comment from view completely is VERY different from letting people hide it - and it's not Mike, but the community here that's quickly tiring of the trolls. Asking people to click if they want to view a comment that's been reported as trolling or spam is not censorship.
So come on, cite where Mike has called such an action censorship. Besides, if it's censorship, how can I view your bleating idiocy in order to respond to it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
You don't do it because you don't like the language used, the ONLY reason you choose to "REPORT" the comment is because you don't agree with what is said.
You are using a power to stifle free and open speech. To supress or censor comments that you do not agree with.
That's what censorship is, I am sure if you had the ability to delete the post you would exercise it to supress comments YOU don't agree with..
You are so against censorship, yet you routinely use it without a second thought.. ALL THE TIME..
"Oh I don't agree with that"... REPORT
"Oh I don't agree with that!! " ,.... REPORT
"I don't agree with what he is saying either.... REPORT
Ahh job done, now what else can I censor..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
I rarely use the report button myself, and usually only for openly racist and/or homophobic comments that I find extremely offensive, or outright spam that's bypassed the filters. That's rare here, thankfully.
I certainly don't use the button to hide things I disagree with, as evidenced by the thousands of replies to such comments I've written, which you can openly read if you wish. But hey, don't let the fact that you have to outright lie about me get in the way of attacking that strawman .Maybe you'd like to explain how I can still read the drooling idiocy emanating from your keyboard in order to reply to it, if it's censored.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
If your not one of those who engages in censorship here to stifle speech, good for you, then why are you so offended ?
To read the censored comments I have to take specific actions to 'get around' this form of censorship..
To quote Masnick..
"But it is censorship, Deborah, even if it's a low-flying, somewhat malign, "opt-in" version of censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
"If your not one of those who engages in censorship here to stifle speech, good for you, then why are you so offended ?"
Because I'm tired of you morons whining about censorship whenever your regular lies, personal attacks and other crap is reported by those tired of reading them. It's usually just another way for you people to attack others rather than actually take part in a discussion about the points actually being raised, rather than the strawmen and fantasies you usually attack. You (or other ACs) simply use them as an excuse to derail the thread in another direction rather than actually discuss the matter at hand.
Your post was also phrased as a personal attack against me, which I have every right to get offended about when not a word of it was true. Sorry if I got "offended" by naked slander personally directed at me. Perhaps you'd consider not resorting to lies and slander so next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Don't feed the troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Justice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gwammer
"Firstly, ..." Etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
advocatus diaboli
If it's something like that, then although this woman's act was horrifying, punishment doesn't really make any sense, and if we are civilized people we won't relish the idea of her suffering for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: advocatus diaboli
If it truly was a medical/mental issue that caused it, then no, she shouldn't be 'punished' per say. However, by the same token mental illness or no she has proven herself to be incredibly dangerous to animals, and potentially humans, and should very much be kept in a situation like an asylum(if it's mental illness), or a prison(if she's just plain twisted and sadistic) where she wouldn't have the ability for a repeat performance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe she was just hungry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A better idea.
It's about time those morons did something useful for a change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A better idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
she wont go to prison
you can shoot 15 year old black kids and get away with it, you can most certainly burn a dog to death and get away with it. She will claim diminished responsibilities, it's clear she does have something like bipolar disorder.
Hoping she gets punished 'in Heaven or Hell' is not going to help either.
BTW: what has this got to do with Techdirt ??
As sad and regrettable as this is, it will not result in her imprisonment.
But if she did that to my dog, I would simply fucking kill her, then do my time.. (then burn her house down).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: she wont go to prison
Let me correct that for you...
"But if she did that to my dog, I would simply fucking kill her by burning her alive in her house, then do my time.."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: she wont go to prison
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: she wont go to prison
FTFY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: she wont go to prison
that's some nice censorship..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the dog got loose or she released it and it was wandering around the neighborhood, how do they know that she chained it in the back yard?
Not defending her in the slightest, just wondering about the facts of the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Link to original story
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dog
Does it ??? really !!.. Watch out Masnick..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: dog
But it is censorship, Deborah, even if it's a low-flying, somewhat malign, "opt-in" version of censorship
BUT IT IS CENSORSHIP !!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: dog
Cite your sources correctly, and you won't look like such a tool all the time. Well, it'll be a start, at least.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are far worse than this running around loose
President Obama - happily wanting to take out both Manning and Snowden for revealing the atrocities done in the name of the USA, without wanting to stop and fix the abuses being done.
AG Holder sending letter saying he will not demand death for Snowden, when he actions suggest that all he wants.
All the NSA sods - details elsewhere
All the CIA sods - acceptable losses
Your typical Colombian drug lord and his colombian necktie
Your typical white supremacist and actions to a non-white who stands up to them
Shall we continue?
Much as the actions reported are appalling, there is far worse and more important things to get you ire up over. Those who have responded about doing likewise to her (in a fit of pique) are actually coming across as no better than she (I know she is the cat's mother).
She has been caught and there is no need for mob rule.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There are far worse than this running around loose
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There are far worse than this running around loose
You list a lot of evil things, but this bitch personally lit the fire and let the poor creature die in agony, then bragged about it. She might be a good candidate for the CIA or Obama's Brown Shirt Army, but doesn't deserve freedom ever again. I suspect that if there is an afterlife, she'll eventually twig to what's she's done; the life review is supposed to be quite disturbing. But, for now, please drag her sorry ass out of society and toss it into a federal prison or an insane asylum.
I agree with the article's author: Adrienne Martin may very well be the worst woman currently in existence. Or at least among the very worst. I hope her sister-in-law gets some kind of justice. I hope the dog has found peace and happiness in another world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hot dog! Get yer hot dog here!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
innocent until.. what again?
So I recommend to take a deep breath instead of calling for instant crucification.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hell? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hell? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eye for an eye!
Where’s Karma? And an eye for an eye? She should be chained and torched too! STUPID JUDGE, probably just as bad for releasing this evil
Bitch!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]