Trolling Effects Launched To Build A Database Of Patent Troll Threats
from the much-needed dept
One of the most useful tools in understanding the abuse of DMCA takedown letters is the site ChillingEffects.org. Now, the EFF, along with some other organizations focused on the excesses of patent trolling, have launched Trolling Effects to create a database of patent troll threats. As we've discussed in the past, one of the more nefarious aspects of patent trolling is that we really have no idea how widespread the practice is, because so many companies who receive threat letters from trolls quickly do the math and realize it's cheaper to just pay up to get the troll to go away than to fight it in court -- even if the recipient of a threat letter is absolutely positive they don't infringe. That's what the trolls rely on. Even if they have no argument, they know it's expensive to fight back. Most of the time, no one outside of the troll and the recipient even knows about these letters and threats. There's been no way to see how widespread this activity is. So even if we now know that the majority of patent lawsuits involve trolling behavior, the real problem is significantly worse because of all of the hidden transactions via bogus threat letters.The Trolling Effects site is designed to (hopefully) provide some more transparency on this issue, by getting recipients of threat letters to publish them in a searchable database. Not only will this provide a lot more information for public study, but it will also help recipients of these letters know that they're not alone. All too often, the trolls "win" a settlement because the recipients don't even know how to go about fighting back. But if recipients can see that the troll sent similar letters to dozens or even hundreds of others, they can more easily band together to create an effective defense. Kudos to everyone behind this project. I'm excited to see what comes out of it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patent trolls, patents, trolling effects
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hopefully...
...the EFF moves beyond merely data-basing the threats, but builds in a notification mechanism that allows multiple parties being Trolled by the same Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) to collaborate as to where in "troll-process" they are and if pooling their legal resources would make financial sense.
Hopefully some enterprising lawyers out there emerge and realize that a counter-trolling representation service that forces any shotgun trolling attempts into a single case before the courts would be a good business to be in.
.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take a cue from Prenda...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am writing to inform you that we are aware of you flaragent violation of our patent for "Creation of a collection of information from while people can derive information about entities that are performing Intellectual Property protection through creative use of the US legal system - on the internet".
While it is our position that you have clearly found and made use of our patented technology, therefore having willfully violated our patent, we would like to give you the opportunity to "do the right thing" and pay for a license for this technology.
Since we have had a lot of experience in this arena, we are fully aware of the costs of development of this technology and the costs of defending a legal action and would like to offer you the license at 2% less than the cost of legally defending yourselves - or in dollars, $18,750.
Please send a check or money order as soon as possible.
Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more dissembling by Masnick
“patent troll”
infringers and their paid puppets’ definition of ‘patent troll’:
anyone who has the nerve to sue us for stealing their invention
This is just spin control by infringers to cover up their theft and an attempt to destroy their small competitors.
The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will...patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. This is just dissembling by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. It is purely about legalizing theft. The fact is, many of the large multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. To them the only patents that are legitimate are their own -if they have any. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals ship more and more US jobs overseas.
It’s about property rights. They should not only be for the rich and powerful. Our founders: Jefferson, Franklin, Madison and others felt so strongly about the rights of inventors that they included inventors rights to their creations and discoveries in the Constitution. They understood the trade off. Inventors are given a limited monopoly and in turn society gets the benefits of their inventions (telephone, computer, airplane, automobile, lighting, etc) into perpetuity and the jobs the commercialization of those inventions bring. For 200 years the patent system has not only fueled the US economy, but the world’s. If we weaken the patent system we force inventors underground like Stradivarius (anyone know how to make a Stradivarius violin?) and in turn weaken our economy and job creation. Worse yet, we destroy the American dream -the ability to prosper from our ingenuity for the benefit of our children and communities. To kill or weaken the patent system is to kill their futures. Show me a country with weak or ineffective property rights and I’ll show you a weak economy with high unemployment. If we cannot own the product of our minds or labors, what can we be said to truly own. Life and liberty are fundamentally tied to and in fact based on property rights. Our very lives are inseparably tied to our property.
Prior to the Supreme Court case eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the eBay decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked their chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling! If you don’t like this state of affairs (your unemployment is running out), tell your Congress member. Then maybe we can get some sense back into the patent system with injunctions fully enforceable on all infringers by all patentees, large and small.
Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners -large and small.
For the truth about trolls, please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html#pt.
http://www.hoover.org/publications/defining-ideas/art icle/142741
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792442
https://www.facebook.com/pi.ausa.5
http://piausa.wor dpress.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: more dissembling by Masnick
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: more dissembling by Masnick
Incorrect. This is about theft on the part of patent trolls. They collect patents that by any reasonable measure should never have been granted, then sue small companies and individuals for infringing on them. They have no intention of actually going to court (where their patents would probably be invalidated), but instead rely on the fact that their victims simply cannot afford to defend themselves in court and so must settle.
It's called "extortion".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And what about the half of the time that patents are held to be invalid and uninfringed, and thus not upheld at all? And what about all the times the times cases never make it to court because the allegedly infringing party can't be sure about the invalidity of the patent, so pays the 'settlement fee' just in case?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New Prior art patent finding tool
It's free, and the beta is here : www.amberscope.com
It's almost fun, (well relative to the subject of patents.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]