Obama's Response To NSA Was To Appease The Public, Not Reduce The Spying
from the total-failure dept
We've spent much of the afternoon detailing some of President Obama's statements concerning his response to the NSA surveillance revelations, combined with some of the documents released by the administration. But a key point in all of this is highlighted in the Associated Press's coverage of the press conference: President Obama flat out admitted that this was about appeasing a public that doesn't trust the administration, not about reducing the surveillance.President Barack Obama made it clear Friday he has no intention of stopping the daily collection of American phone records. And while he offered "appropriate reforms," he blamed government leaks for creating distrust of his domestic spying program.Even more to the point, his comments represent a fundamental misunderstanding of why the public doesn't trust the government. That's because he keeps insisting that the program isn't being abused and that all of this collection is legal. But, really, that's not what the concern is about. Even though we actually know that the NSA has a history of abuse (and other parts of the intelligence community before that), a major concern is that scooping up so much data is considered legal in the first place. So, when President Obama says that we should blindly trust the government not to abuse the data, that's missing the point:
In an afternoon news conference, the president acknowledged the domestic spying has troubled Americans and hurt the country's image abroad. But he called it a critical counterterrorism tool.
"Understandably, people would be concerned," the president said. "I would be, too, if I weren't inside the government."That's not particularly comforting.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: barack obama, bulk collection, concerns, ed snowden, nsa, nsa surveillance, public, trust
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The problem is that there isn't anything that President Obama or Congress could do that could restore the trust that he lost with the American People. Ever since this Snowden thing began, his administration has made one blunder after another and the only thing that Democrats have done is to turn Snowden into a cause.
At this point, I don't see Snowden ever returning to the United States because authorities would arrest him just as soon as he touched ground in this country. Law enforcement agencies use all kinds of duplicitous tricks in order to capture and/or arrest somebody they are after. Anyone think that the Federal government wouldn't resort to the same tricks?
Snowden's cause has become a rallying point for injustice among the people and he simply has become an ideal, a martyr, for everyone who has ever suffered an injustice. I find it hilarious that Snowden's status as a champion of human and civil rights has been created solely by Democrats and the liberal media, although I suspect tha6t isn't what they intended when they began their campaign to discredit him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Just as many Rs as Ds support this position (in fact look at the way certain Rs reacted to the speech today), and just as many Ds as Rs are against it. It's not partisan. Suggesting that this is a party position really just highlights a partisan position not based on facts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Given Obama's rhetoric as a candidate it is really disappointing (and slightly surprising) that he went native so quickly. Generally one would have expected less from a republican.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already
it was impossible to say which was which."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Principles
Unfortunately there are two ways to measure against these principles (1) What is the spirit and intent of each principle, and how good is the governance match? (2) How can I get the interpretation of each principle to match my own agenda, and how can I sell this interpretation to the public? Unfortunately even a rock solid Constitution still requires ethical people to administer. How did we get to the point where there are SECRET laws, and it is a felony to divulge the content of those laws?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There are plenty of Republicans who have done the same to Snowden as the Democrats have.
And there are Dems and Republicans in Congress who are on Snowden and the American people's side.
Hell, even some of the staff members of the Rs are getting fed up with the way things are done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm not sure he's even thinking anymore. Look at how gray he's become. He's probably given up on whatever vision he may have had at the start and is just staggering through each day as if it's a shift at McDonald's, just waiting for the day when it'll finally be over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Even the latest vote in the GOP controlled house showed Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner voting the same!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: kenichi tanaka on Aug 9th, 2013 @ 7:57pm
Why make it a partisan issue by saying this? The fourth amendment is not a dem vs rep thing and should not be viewed through that lens. We saw that with the amsash vote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama's Placification Strategy
Both parties participated and still participate in this racket, but they're not the worst offenders. The worst offenders are this and other nations' "intelligence communities" which are globally joined and constitute a para-government that's unaccountable to politicians of any stripe. I believe because it has dirt on everyone, it probably gets politicians of all persuasions to do its bidding lest they be exposed for some petty or capital crime.
Focusing on Obama and his ilk may be satisfying, doing something when it seems we can't do anything. But it won't solve a thing. This is much deeper than that. We need some real anti-authoritarian, collective oppositional innovation, not old slogans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The administration's job is to represent the interests of its constituents. It gets that wrong sometimes, true. But the numbers indicate you're in an echo chamber that is out of touch with what people (all the people, not just the ones you agree with) actually want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hmm...
24% are against Snowden...
24% are neutral towards Snowden
31% don't know him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I know this is Techdirt and everything is the government's fault exclusively. But here their response seems to be consistent with the attitudes of the actual people, not the people as you imagine they exist. Is your position that Americans just don't know what's good for them, and so they need the enlightened Techdirt community to make decisions for them? That's what it's starting to sound like...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Many people are ignorant thanks to our mainstream media. They get mislead by having the facts selectively presented to them. That needs to change. The mainstream media monopolies need to go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No, when the RIAA, MPAA, mainstream media, government established taxi-cab monopolists, and many others can't make a living without the governments help in the form of monopoly privileges that is their own fault. It is no one else's fault that you can't make a living without IP privileges, it is your own fault and your own fault alone. Don't cry to the government about 'piracy' and blame your failures on the government and on everyone else. It is your own fault. Abolish IP and if you can't make a living you have only yourself to blame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
When I talk about this stuff to people, they don't always understand right away until I start breaking down the details, THEN they're against the NSA and for what Snowden did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The job of the government as a whole is to represent the interests of its constituents. The way it's supposed to do that is via democracy, under rules set forth by the constitution. When the executive branch embarks on a policy of lying to the legislative branch, that's a grotesque violation of the constitution.
The popularity of the program isn't really significant; they've already pissed all over their democratic principles by the way they implemented the program.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"
The fact that almost everyone in government and in the media is lying to the American public is not relevant to the topic?
Do explain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Circle Jerk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
One poll is meaningless. I can just as easily point to a poll that says the opposite. In fact, here:
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/opinion/article/Snowden-affair-spotlights-gap-between-media-4682 698.php
Not saying that's accurate either. Just pointing out that there is significant reason to believe that the public is, in fact, against the spying in a big way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The whole point of our system is that we make decisions based on fact, not fancy. And the simple fact of the matter is that there is no good evidence that these programs are beneficial. When the 45% can present arguments based on merit to counter the arguments presented by the 55%, then we'll pay attention to them. Until then, we will INSISIT that these things be stopped. Immediately. We don't want transparency or reform, we want an outright end of these programs.
“...Cities may be rebuilt, and a People reduced to Poverty, may acquire fresh Property: But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty once lost is lost forever. When the People once surrendered their share in the Legislature, and their Right of defending the Limitations upon the Government, and of resisting every Encroachment upon them, they can never regain it.” - John Adams
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As of right now, the Constitution is just for show and has no meaning or functions.
How long did the great experiment called 'democracy' last before corruption destroyed it? A little over 200? The human race never ceases to disappoint me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Civil war? A minor scuffle. World War 1 and 2? Playground battles. Civil rights struggle? Slavery? Burning of the White House? Secret war in Cambodia? Teapot Dome scandal? Japanese internment? All of this is nothing compared to this latest threat to democracy, right? Yep, might as well close up shop now.
The ignorance, it burns so much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Stay on-topic please...I am sure that the community will be reporting this post shortly, just like they do with everyone else whose discussion veers off-topic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yeah, and two wrongs make a right, right?
Do you even know the history behind laws that protect us from being searched without a warrant? Do you know the reason why the founding fathers included these laws and the history of repressive governments without these laws?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
And don't give us this nonsense, 'the difference between us and other countries is that we are a democracy. We vote. So then we should vote and let the government do whatever the heck it wants after that point'. No, that's not how it works either and that defeats the whole purpose of having a democracy. The point of voting and having a democracy is so that we can hopefully influence how we are governed and hopefully remove politicians from office who govern in ways that maybe against our interests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually you will find that most countries are now democracies by that measure. The mechanics of democracy are a very good cover for autocracy.
True democracy requires more.
It requires the absence of fraud and manipulation of the electoral process.
It requires an electoral system that doesn't severely limit the possible outcomes of the electoral process.
It requires an electoral system that doesn't effectively disenfranchise large parts of the population.
It requires communication media that can give the public a full and unbiased view of the political arena.
It requires that those in power respect the rights and wishes of minorities and do not assume that 51% of the vote gives them the right to do whatever they want.
The US has failed on most of those counts in recent years (as do many other countries) so calling the US a democracy in contrast to others is questionable at best.
I'd place the US slightly below Russia but above Zimbabwe in the democratic league just now!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
While we're at it, let's vote on whether the police should be allowed to break into homes without warrants, berate and maim the occupants while destroying their private property.
And let's not forget to vote on whether banksters should be held accountable for their actions.
This will not happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So what you're saying is that since the government has a very long history of abuse we should allow them to continue to abuse their power because ...
Maybe part of the reason this is so upsetting is because the government has a long history of abuse and so we know, from history, that it can't be trusted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If these unconstitutional domestic spy programs don't end, America will turn into a corrupt totalitarian state. The Constitution of the United States was supposed to prevent this from happening.
As of right now, the Constitution is just for show and has no meaning or functions.
How long did the great experiment called 'democracy' last before corruption destroyed it? A little over 200? The human race never ceases to disappoint me.
You agree with this? That this is literally the thing that will destroy the constitution and the US democracy? This is really a rational position to take, in the face of everything else that has happened in the past 200 years in this country? Of all the threats the country has faced and muddled through, of all the bad decisions that we have made and later corrected, the one that is going to destroy us is THIS?
Perspective, people, get it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I think the British Empire contradicts your assertion. Democracy in Britain certainly increased during the Imperial period (2nd half of 19th century 1st half of 20th).
Of course increasing democracy certainly was a factor in the ending of the empire but your assertion that empire inevitably destroys democracy is clearly false.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
How in earth could burning of a building be of any relative importance?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
He was the first senator to be sentenced to prison.
What do you think would happen if a senator was caught doing that today? Would it even be made public? If he even lost his job, the senator would just slide into a sweet gig at some hedge fund or energy company. Or he would just wait a year then run for Mayor of some huge city.
The system is completely dysfunctional now. It's just not possible to say things are going fine with a straight face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We all ignored the Civil War, we ignored Vietnam, we ignored the burning of the White House... and THAT all worked out fine!
Oh wait. No. We didn't. And we shouldn't now.
If your only gripe is that this is labeled as more significant, then you're no better than a grammar nazi, and need to start looking at the big picture. Even if this is the tenth worst threat, it's a huge threat to our way of life.
If your gripe is that we're freaking out about what's taking place... then I don't have an insulting enough label to place on you, so I'll just say that is an ignorant and lazy view.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Make no mistake, this is totally different from all those events you listed. America's democracy is teetering on the edge of the abyss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It' almost like the élite have forgotten the collectiv e faces of America's Fathers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
wtf is does that mean?
perhaps you meant intact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While spying might be an awesome counter-terrorism tool, perhaps we should have given thought to other options.
One need only look at the copyright fight (Yeah me mention copyright, keep reading anyways) to see how this fails.
They increase the laws, penalties, surveillance and the problem gets worse.
When they stop following those ideas and try other things, the problem gets better.
It might be time to stop following the path laid out by those who profit from getting more expanding programs, and look at other programs without high powered lobbyists behind them.
Want people to stop hating America?
Stop screwing with them, their lives, their politics.
Stop supporting dictators because it makes the oil flow easily.
Stop calling out the "bad leaders" when you sold your moral highground out to treat your citizens the same or worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Abolition of slavery
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce these article by appropriate legislation.
December 6, 1865."
Please take your own advice and learn United States history. Article 13 wasn't even part of the Constitution at the time of the civil war. It was amended 'after' the civil war that lasted from 1861 to 1865.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And of course secession isn't a threat at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Once again, missing the point. Why don't we all just ignore the laws because laws can be changed anyways (after all the government does it and you don't seem to think it's that big a deal). What's that you say, a poor person infringed on IP? They should be jailed forever!!!
If you want to come here and have a serious discussion then proceed. But if you just want to come here and look foolish don't be surprised when no one takes you seriously.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You're starting to get it now. You see the problem here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The polls everyone seems to be quoting are not accurate. There is not only overwhelming support for Snowden here in the United States but in other countries, Snowden has also become a folk hero. There is more animosity toward the liberal news media (who didn't start reporting on Snowden until after The Guardian broke the story and started revealing many classified documents that revealed the secrecy behind the spy program), the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress.
Fact is, there is more support for Snowden in this country and abroad then there is for those against him.
I can't believe you guys quoted polls that were conducted among liberal news media which was largely liberal Democrats who were taking those polls. IN the history of this country, there hasn't been a single poll that's refletive of the people living in this country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Because...you said so?
IN the history of this country, there hasn't been a single poll that's refletive of the people living in this country.
Oh, never mind, I thought you were sane there for a second.
Attention future Techdirt advertisers...you, too can reach this prime demographic...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It makes you look smarter than the idiot shills who want more of the police state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
- lol -
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The misunderstanding isn't Obama's
This was a very valuable article. Thanks for raising the questions you raise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The misunderstanding isn't Obama's
Except Jimmy Carter - and look what happened to him!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The misunderstanding isn't Obama's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The misunderstanding isn't Obama's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The misunderstanding isn't Obama's
No, he's not, except for the purposes of foreign relations. He's the point person for the executive branch. He doesn't speak for the other 2/3rds of government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi
The NSA's spying capabilities makes the Stasi look like amateurs. Again, please take your own advice a learn history. Those who don't, are destined to repeat it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you are inside the government, the spying is used to support your position, however if you are outside and oppose the government it is used to reduce your threat to the government.
So anybody who thinks that the government has gone too far has a very good reason to be concerned, they are easily classified as anarchists and terrorists, and spying is targetted against them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Words and Lies
Polls don't do justice to the total American opinion. I'd say it's probably far, far higher against the spying than for it, and I'd love to think that given enough reason, most people would impeach the Congress and the President.
Sad to say, we've not gotten to that point. Probably never will, at this rate.
It's so much like spitting into the wind and about as useful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Martin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Martin
Long story short, Joseph Reichard, fuck off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Martin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Martin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Martin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hell, President Obama and Harry Reid are always talking about how hard it is to pass bills in Congress and how they're always talking about going around Congress in order to get Congress.
If anyone is guilty of any crime, it's the Democrats for actually suggesting that the president bypass Congress in order to get things done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
All encompassing statements about everyone are usually deficient in some aspect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We live in the era which will be remembered as having one of the largest domestic and foreign spying programs ever devised and your response is "you're just paranoid"? Get off your high horse, you ignorant slob.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
OP - "the Obama Administration in league with the U.S. Congress, thinks that every American is a security threat and a risk to national security."
Reply to OP - "not everyone in congress is paranoid"
Your maniacal response - "We live in the era which will be remembered as having one of the largest domestic and foreign spying programs ever devised and your response is "you're just paranoid"? Get off your high horse, you ignorant slob."
So I am an ignorant slob because I implied many in Congress are paranoid, interesting concept but lacking in logic. The definition of paranoid includes things like "suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania" ... are you suggesting that Congress does not exhibit these traits when they "think that every American is a security threat"? Are you attempting to claim that no members of Congress exhibit these traits? Please explain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BEST. QUOTE. EVER.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Congress critters are showing their allegiance on this issue. Vote out the Federalists, keep the defenders of Liberty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
P.S Stop buying that salt at the grocery store down the street(credit/Debit ) ;) I told you we know everything
Yours truly ,
The NSA and Company
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quelle suprise!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just please please please PLEASE don't pay any attention to all that stuff he revealed. Here, look at this not-biased poll telling you that a bunch of morons (approx 1000 of them!) barely know who Snowden is and may have only made their opinion through the use of coin-flipping. You are a true American and believes that Snowden is the anti-christ, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Source for quote
I can't find a video of him saying this. Is it a paraphrase of the entire speech, or did he ACTUALLY say this? Where is the source?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]