Irish Government Moves Into The Digital Age By Treating Everything Like Paper

(Mis)Uses of Technology

from the progress,-eh?-not-sure-I'm-familiar-with-that-term... dept

Mon, Aug 19th 2013 10:28pm — Tim Cushing

Updating laws for the digital age is hard. Apparently. Maybe it's just a government problem. After all, an entity that generally moves at the speed of a narcoleptic sloth and with the grace of an ocean liner can't be expected to turn on a dime and start bureaucratizing like it's 1999.

The Irish government is currently in the process of updating its Freedom of Information laws, and from the looks of what's surfaced so far, it's attempting to legislate itself back to the mid-1970s.

Section 17 (4) (b) in particular contains the following restriction on how much freedom you can expect your information to have.

"[T]he FOI body shall take reasonable steps to search for and extract the records to which the request relates, having due regard to the steps that would be considered reasonable if the records were held in paper format..."

This then is the yardstick by which ‘reasonable’ action shall be based. You only have to do it if it was reasonable if everything was printed out and you had only paper to work with.

Query a database? Sure, it might only take a moment to use the search box. But if I had to print it all out and go through it by hand, that would be an unreasonable demand. So, no.

It's almost as though someone caught the government inadvertently dragging itself into the digital age and ordered the Efficiency Committee to take a long look at the bill's wording and see if there wasn't some excess efficiency that couldn't be streamlined out.

If this bill passes, FOI requests in Ireland will be treated as if the government is putting its best men (and women) on it, even if it's really just a bored intern running some surface-level searches. Sure, Ted the lazy but relatively competent, unpaid intern may be able to access the appropriate documents and spit them out of the nearest laser printer in 5-10 minutes, but in doing so, has completely undercut the nearly-universal governmental tendency to add extra steps to processes and racking up amazing amounts of man-hours/woman-hours.

The Irish government is rooted in years of tradition ("rooted" being the key) -- as it always was, so shall it always be. This purity will be maintained even if it means carving out alternate realities with creative legislation.

Freedom of Info Bill 13 (PDF)Freedom of Info Bill 13 (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: digital, freedom of information, ireland, paper

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2013 @ 11:21pm

I guess it would be too hard to set an internet database up for people to use freely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2013 @ 11:32pm

the more I think about it. I'm not sure if this is accurate but if by chance the word digital is derived from the word digit then haven't we always been in the digital age?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- CK20XX, 20 Aug 2013 @ 12:08am
  
  Re:
  Only technically, not in spirit. No one in power ever expected the internet to become as powerful as it has. It's like it changed all the rules when no one was looking, and a lot of people are still struggling to catch up.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Aug 2013 @ 1:43am

The Irish are easy stereotypes to ridicule, let's not fall into that trap.
'nuff said
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Aug 2013 @ 3:21am

But who said that treating digital like paper was a fault?

Right about now, I'm betting the US wished this policy was in place so they had a valid reason to say "no" we can't produce that information for a FOI request.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 20 Aug 2013 @ 3:44am

According to the MAFIAA accounting practices digitally printing (???) any document would deprive grocery stores of their income. So the Irish government is right, we should think of all those e-trees.

What am I saying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Aug 2013 @ 6:00am

They should then also limit what they may collect on anyone to something that a regular human could reasonably print.

Enough of that twisted one-sided logic meant solely to deprive people of their rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
any moose cow word, 20 Aug 2013 @ 10:51am

If I were that intern, I would just use the search box, gleam a few relevant items, then tell my boss that the "paper" search took all day while I really sat around playing Halo. Being a slacker doesn't mean you don't work at all, just that you work smarter than everyone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Aug 2013 @ 1:06pm

The outrage machine reads the language in question as "only produce stuff if it would have been reasonable to produce it were it on paper". Could the language really be intended to prevent agencies from saying "it's too complicated and expensive to answer that request because the info is held in a computer" for info that would be easily available were it held on paper?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), 20 Aug 2013 @ 9:37pm
  
  Re:
  Could the language really be intended to prevent agencies from saying "it's too complicated and expensive to answer that request because the info is held in a computer" for info that would be easily available were it held on paper?
  
  Possibly. But I don't see how that would make it any less stupid.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Claire Ryan, 21 Aug 2013 @ 10:28am
  
  Re:
  Irish person here. No, the point of this is to stop Irish journalists and whatnot from getting too much information. It's effectively a get-out clause for the government if they don't want to reveal something - 'sorry, not reasonable, we can't give you that info.'
  
  There's one particular journalist by the name of Gavin Sheridan who's been making a lot of FOIA requests to get anything out of the government, and the number of bullshit excuses they use to get out of it is staggering. So this looks like just another they can use if needed.
  
  Seriously, I don't think you realise just how completely fucked up the Irish government is... if someone told me tomorrow that they'd decided to only accept requests by carrier pigeon, I'd believe it. And the very idea that they'd do something that isn't completely self-serving and tainted by cronyism or flat-out incompetence is ridiculous to me at this point.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sheogorath (profile), 21 Aug 2013 @ 8:38pm

Question
If the Irish government are allowed to treat digital FOI request fulfilments as if they're physical ones, does that mean I'm entitled to consider an ebook purchased just as if I'd stood in a queue at Waterstone's for it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]