Feds Threaten To Arrest Lavabit Founder For Shutting Down His Service
from the either-you-help-us-spy-on-people-or-you're-a-criminal dept
The saga of Lavabit founder Ladar Levison is getting even more ridiculous, as he explains that the government has threatened him with criminal charges for his decision to shut down the business, rather than agree to some mysterious court order. The feds are apparently arguing that the act of shutting down the business, itself, was a violation of the order:... a source familiar with the matter told NBC News that James Trump, a senior litigation counsel in the U.S. attorney’s office in Alexandria, Va., sent an email to Levison's lawyer last Thursday – the day Lavabit was shuttered -- stating that Levison may have "violated the court order," a statement that was interpreted as a possible threat to charge Levison with contempt of court.That same article suggests that the decision to shut down Lavabit was over something much bigger than just looking at one individual's information -- since it appears that Lavabit has cooperated in the past on such cases. Instead, the suggestion now is that the government was seeking a tap on all accounts:
Levison stressed that he has complied with "upwards of two dozen court orders" for information in the past that were targeted at "specific users" and that "I never had a problem with that." But without disclosing details, he suggested that the order he received more recently was markedly different, requiring him to cooperate in broadly based surveillance that would scoop up information about all the users of his service. He likened the demands to a requirement to install a tap on his telephone.It sounds like the feds were asking for a full on backdoor on the system, not unlike some previous reports of ISPs who have received surprise visits from the NSA.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: criminal charges, doj, email, ladar levison, nsa, nsa surveillance
Companies: lavabit
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
At least they can be reigned in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...but actually..what they wanted me to do...was repackage out-of-date Burger King Whopper Meat....and sell it to unsuspecting Japanese locals...when i refused..they came down like a ton of bricks...except that I secretly tape -recorded the threats...and they "lost"..your government is corrupt to it's core..and we should be holding Grand Juries for treason and war-crimes..impeaching and convicting a lot of people..and hanging them immediately...
Regards,
RJ O'Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves - The Life of an Insane Family
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "playground bullies"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now they have a supercomputer in UT gathering data on every citizen they possibly can in America. Along with the pre-crime thing they are trying to get up and running.Where you can be arrested in order to PREVENT crimes you might POSSIBLY do in the FUTURE. How insane is this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On othe other hand, I'm guessing that you can't destroy evidence that doesn't exist, so a purely prospective order doesn't have the same concerns attached to it. I could believe the U.S. Attorney's Office bullying someone without legal grounds, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What it was, we can only guess. That is a problem the ones producing secret orders face: those left out of the loop will imagine the worst.
So, let's start the guessing game? Ordered from bad to worse.
* Putting a backdoor which will save everything done by one user.
* Putting a backdoor which will save the password typed by one user.
* Putting a backdoor which will save everything done by all users.
* Putting a backdoor which will save the password typed by all users.
* Putting code which will attempt to invade the computer of one or more users, as was done this month on Freedom Hosting, by the FBI or the NSA.
Any other one I missed? Since we have to assume the worst, my current guess is "they wanted to add code to Lavabit to invade the user's computer".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So either it was incompetence on a grand scale, or someone didn't think things through very well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They're already sharing with the DoJ
Which implies that laundering the evidence trail to bypass forth-amendment protections has been a common practice for some time now.
Note the whole to bypass forth-amendment protections part, because that's why there's an evidence trail in the first place.
Crime committed to serve the state is still crime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They're already sharing with the DoJ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They're already sharing with the DoJ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In fact, that is the real reason we should be terrified.The best and brightest in the field aren't generally pining to get into a gov job lol (gov should also remember this if they want to keep pushing the boundaries in a place that they are not the home team). All that data is stored and protected by government IT people. Except that the way the nsa has decided to deal with the snowden situation is by getting rid of all of its network admins.So now,it won't just be incompetent gov IT safeguarding your data that you have to fear,its that no one will be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: M. Alan Thomas II on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 3:58pm
That is why the argument the Bully (good one Alana) is making is for contempt of court. Apparently they sought to dragnet future information which he foiled by shutting down. Apparently the Bully thinks it can order you to work for them. The question will be can the Bully force a person or business to work as an informant without his or its consent. Recently a court via a search warrant tried to order doctors to pump a man's stomach for cocaine. They refused. They won.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shutting down the service
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lawyers and all that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patriot Act
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
I choose to use google and they can have some of my info in exchange for the services they provide. I CHOOSE TO DO THAT!!!!! If I don't like it, I can use other services - and there are plenty of other service providers that I can CHOOSE to use.
I DID NOT CHOOSE for the government to do so. I HAVE NO CHOICE in the matter, if I don't like it, well tough shit for me (everybody).
If you don't understand that simple fundamental difference, then as I opened, you're an IDIOT!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
Hmm, that means we have (information) taxation but no representation - what could we do now? :) Revoke your hypocritical Declaration of Independence? Declare our own?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
YOU CAN CHOOSE NOT TO USE GOOGLE SERVICES.
Do I need to explain it using jellybeans?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
Lavabit was providing a service so that people who don't like how Google and others handle things can have options.
Seeing as the whole PRISM thing makes a lot of people wary of Gmail, it's not unreasonable.
I understand the author of the comment has a sordid past around here, but once in awhile the comments aren't just trolling or ad hominems
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.
all are affected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If Lavabit's software sent un-hashed user passwords over the wire, then a ethernet splitter inside Lavabit's LAN would be able to intercept ALL user passwords.
If Lavabit's software sent hashed user passwords over the wire, then it would require a backdoor built into Lavabit's email software to intercept user passwords.
I believe Lavabit sends un-hashed passwords over the wire, so more than likely the US Gov. wanted to install an ethernet splitter inside Lavabit's LAN (local area network), and intercept all user passwords.
Similar to the ethernet splitters used in AT&T and Verizon networks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think that's more likely, Lavabit focused enough on security it's unlikely they were sending cleartext passwords over the wire.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
First off they are called fiber optic splitters.
The traffic is encrypted, passwords are hashed.
The storage on the servers is encrypted and can't be unencrypted by Lavabit, only by the client with their password.
The order was probably for access to the storage, which would require the users password, ie implementing the ability to get the users password.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:24pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, I think it's the backdoor option. I'll bet Lavabit hashes passwords and only sends encrypted email, so they wanted them to install a backdoor in the client software. That would be a "markedly different" order that would justify shutting down their business.
My takeaway from this is that we are beginning to understand the importance of open-source privacy software like PGP. A proprietary security/encryption program could be rock solid -- unbreakable -- or perhaps not if the NSA were able to get to the author with a FISA order. If the software were open-source and people around the world were scrutinizing any alterations to the source code and compiling the software themselves, it would be very hard -- perhaps impossible -- to slip in any backdoors. I felt in the 1990s that the developing internet protocols should have all included strong encryption. I never thought that it would be to protect Americans from the government. Yet here we are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:24pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Shut Up and Obey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
asking for it
No. Nope. It doesn't sound like they were "asking".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: asking for it
It sounds like the feds were demanding a full on backdoor on the system, not unlike some previous reports of ISPs who have received surprise visits from the NSA.
Fixed that for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ok...just...wow...
Does anyone else see this as a repeat of Megaupload's shut down save the fact that Megaupload was ordered to keep its "infringing" data as evidence? It's the same yet in a totally opposite direction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ok...just...wow...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ok...just...wow...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ok...just...wow...
by its action that it can not be trusted. people will pay good money for security. Cuba as a trans atlantic communication and cable nexus to Central and South America, Mexico as the hub from the Pacific. The unintended consequences of this governments actions is going to be the future of the American computer industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The media cares more about their special relationships with government officials than informing the public. Fourth Estate my ass!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Rich Fiscus on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:53pm
We need local news and editorials that are focused on old newspaper traditions.
That will keep the fed controlled news to happen, and well to question, and challenge the happenings. Furthermore, to report how locally we are intertwined.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The threats are utterly empty and are nothing more than the ego spouting of the individual agents concerned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not even the federal government has the right to force a business, company, corporation or website to continue operating simply because they are going to lose the right to spy on Americans.
Good grief, has the federal government been taken over by Scooby Doo?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"And we would've gotten away with it, if it hadn't been for those meddling whistleblowers!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Always have a back door to run out of when the mob appears.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: US govt takenover by Scoobie Doo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So they want to force him to work for the NSA (probably for free even), like it or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Democracy, Anyone?
FISA court orders are secret. We aren't allowed to know what they order people to do.
In the last two years, the FISA court has approved every government request for surveillance submitted to it - including requests for mass surveillance of American citizens' phone and internet communications.
FISA court proceedings are not adversarial. No dissenting argumentation is permitted.
We only know about all of this stuff because Snowden leaked documents (illegally).
How can anyone reach a conclusion different from Jimmy Carter's conclusion? He said that America no longer has a functioning democracy. I'm finding it very difficult to disagree with him.
How can we take back our democracy, folks? It seems to have been stolen from us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
That's what the care and feeding of democracy looks like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?
Lots of people won't take a position (even if they agree with it in their heart) if they feel like they're the weirdo for taking the position. The only way to make those people feel less isolated is for them to hear similar opinions from their friends, family, and neighbors.
While it's not the total solution (no single thing is!), speaking your voice to other individuals is not only nothing like "old man yells at cloud", it's an essential activity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[S]ince this disclosure a substantial amount of misinformation about these programs has been spread, mostly through independent, unaccountable media sources. ... The simple truth is that this authority has thwarted 54 terrorist plots since its creation.
If this is what you get from a member of a group allegedly committed to reducing the size of the Federal Government, there is no hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?
I do love the 'independent, unaccountable media sources' bit, he might as well have come out and called them what he's probably really thinking, that of 'sources that don't answer to the government'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
And all this govt spying is absolutely just another go round of the Nazi SS and the whole "see something, say something" where we start to turn neighbor against neighbor and end up with mass genocides - ours which would be just taking out the "terrorists" I.e. Govt dissenters.
If George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and several others saw us now, they would be mortified at what we the people have let happen to this great country - everything from Pres Lincoln and his forcing states to comply (which was a huge overstep of the federal govt - and yes, I do think all people are created equal and slavery was wrong but he fixed the problem the wrong way) to the creation of our illegal currency we are forced to use today (the Treasury is still the only one legally allowed to print legal tender and mint coins). It goes so much further than this aggregious overstep, I'm not sure it can be fixed without a major overhaul which will not be pretty - esp with all those who rely on govt handouts for their daily living.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy, Anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ummm 4 guys from liverpool had an answer
but when you talk about destruction well dont you know that you can count me out....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ummm 4 guys from liverpool had an answer
Do you think it's gonna be alright?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So you are correct about needing the Certificate Authorities private key, in order to see clear text passwords encrypted with SSL/TLS, and encapsulated in a TCP/IP packet.
Unless SSL/TLS 'forward secrecy' is being used. In which case, have the Certificate Authorities private key won't do an adversary any good, because the session key keeps rotating forward to a new, unique, key for each new connection made to the server. Very few companies have implemented 'forward secrecy' though. It's still a new technology.
However, if the passwords are hashed before being encrypted with SSL/TLS and encapsulated inside a TCP/IP packet. Then having the Certificate Authorities private key doesn't do an adversary any good. All the adversary would be see when looking inside the decrypted packet, would be a hashed password instead of a clear text password.
If Lavabit did send clear text passwords encrypted with SSL/TLS, then we can conclude that the US Government does not have access to Lavabit's Certificate Authorities private key. If the Gov. did have access to it, they could have just captured the packets at one of the major backbone routers on the internet, instead of contacting Lavabit and trying to get them to comply.
It's interesting, because every time the US Gov. makes a move, we can deduce a little more about their technical capabilities.
I could have sworn I read somewhere that Lavabit does not used hashed passwords. If true, then we've just learned that US Gov. does not have access to all, or least some, of the private keys for Certificate Authorities around the world.
Sorry for geeking out. I just find cryptography interesting. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
> It's still a new technology.
The Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm achieves forward
secrecy and it is 37 years old. SSL 3.0 included ephemeral DH
key exchange ciphersuites and that was released in 1996.
It is hardly a new technology, its lack of deployment is mostly
down to apprehension ("will this slow down my service?") and
laziness ("can't be bothered, it works already and my private
key is secure").
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Certificate authority
Of course then the govt would just come to the company and require them to hand over the root cert.
How long until they start requiring this of non-communication businesses, like GE or Exxon-Mobil?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Four elements of contempt
A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
1)Existence of a lawful order
2)The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
3)The potential contemnor's ability to comply
4)The potential contemnor's failure to comply
Judging by Lavabit's own statements. He is guilty of the last three, but the first element is problematic. The lawyer would have to prove it wasn't a lawful order. By common sense standards obviously no, but were not dealing with common sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Four elements of contempt
I would also argue that "failure to comply" wouldn't be applicable since shutting down the company beforehand removed the ability to comply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Four elements of contempt
Being the arm chair lawyer that I am I would say your first point doesn't matter in the courts eyes. This is not a financial court case issue. So I think trust is an irreverent aspect.
Your second point is applicable because he shut down the server after receiving """something""". What we don't know,but we all assume it was a backdoor request/don't say nothing letter.
Could be wrong though, Ive been though 10 minutes of internet/google search lawyer school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Four elements of contempt
Your second point though is highly relevant. Since it brings into question how much control an actual private owner has over their own company when it effects allegedly (I'm going to assume it was not a warrant/subpoena to produce evidence) some fishing expedition by the authorities that may or may not produce relevant evidence for future & unknown cases.
The USG is basically (Based on the information we have) stating... "we require you to give us access to your business data and keep running the business for as long as we deem necessary no matter the consequences or burdens placed upon said business and if you violate this by enacting the absolute lawful right of liquidating the property (business) at your whim we will prosecute you for contempt of authority"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Four elements of contempt
Yes. I am making that assumption also.
If it was the normal "preserve and/or turn over this evidence" type of order, shutting down the company wouldn't even be an issue for the Feds since it wouldn't matter either way. It's pretty obvious now that this order required the service to continue in order to be effective.
PS @ Saltynoob: I am not a lawyer either. Just your average working stiff with an inquiring mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Four elements of contempt
One might liken this to the IRS demanding that you maintain or increase your level of income(and thus taxes paid) year over year, or face prosecution for failure to comply. The only thing that Lavabit *may* be liable for, if at all, is failure to comply with the order in accordance with its *existing* capability.
In any event, the inexorable march toward a police state continues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mistake
We argued on the last story whether him having to shut down his business gave him standing to challenge this in open court. Now there's no question - he's being threatened by the government with imprisonment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I simply do not believe in gag orders issued by secret courts who rubber stamp subpoenas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only thing a Certificate Authority does is hold the public key for Lavabit's server.
Lavabit's private key is stored on Lavabit's server, itself.
So it does indeed appear the US Gov. is after access to Lavabit's private session key, stored on it's servers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My nation hasn't yet gone Full Gestapo...
This is a really bad time to be someone of interest to the state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
everything that passes through at&t is easily accessible to gov agencies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not very long...
Remember these words.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
government agents need to do prison time
These government agents all need to stand trial for treason.
Once we get our freedom back, the government agents who have participated in the destruction of American freedom and the abrogation of Constitutional law need to be subjected to Nuremberg style trials.
-Ken
Laser Guided Loogie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:43am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the next Lavabit?
At a fundamental level, security and convenience are incompatible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the next Lavabit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Ross on Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:05am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lavabit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lavabit & evidence
There was a similar case locally a few years ago, where a small mom & pop ISP got into a bit of a bind because they swapped to newer equipment (a new database server). The regional drug task force and the DEA + FBI had "requested" they maintain the older server while they completed the investigation of someone running a rather large meth lab who happened to be a customer of their ISP.
The new system they installed had software that was incompatible with the data formats they previously used for email and account storage, and when they swapped, the old stuff went "poof".
Needless to say the owner barely got out of being jailed themselves, but did have to pay a rather large fine, perform community service, and was reprimanded by a judge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lavabit & evidence
Possibly. But I see a couple problems with the government's case if they choose that tact:
1) This really doesn't seem like it was a normal "warrant/subpoena to produce evidence". Lavabit has stated that they have complied with those in the past.
2) Shutting down the company doesn't really indicate that any data wasn't preserved. Lavabit would have to be fools to destroy anything at this point. The Feds seem more pissed about the service shutting down (ie: access to future info) than any evidence that already exists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lavabit & evidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While waiting in line one dude in line in front of us suddenly bolted and rain out door with cops in pursuit.
Found out later he had unknown to him warrant out for his arrest.
Ask later what meaning of warrant is in this location.
Warrant is issued for anything from unpaid parking ticket to maximum.
Also ask about traffic computer cameras.
Found out that warrants are issued for unpaid camera traffic citations.
Can hear this now.
Black guy goes to DMV to renew driver license shot in back for unknown camera traffic citation.
Welcome to the police state of America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NEVER
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: NEVER
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unbreakable encryption
This doesn't take into account advancements in technology. Quantum computers can break ElGamal encryption, on which most secure webcommunications depend. The NSA doesn't have one, but they're having a D-Wave installed in the Utah base (it's not done being built yet).
After that, we'll have to find a better way to encrypt our data... which will be a necessity even if we shut down the NSA, as that will only delay time before some nation (e.g. Germany) has a Quantum-computer-equipped cyber-intelligence agency. We're ultimately going to have to accept that our communications are being observed by people who don't like us.
We can counter cryptanalytic efforts by encrypting everything, and if necessary adding decoy messages into the mix. This would require such agencies to triage their workload (quantum machines are still expensive to obtain and run).
Sometimes cryptanalysis will be ahead of encryption. Sometimes vice versa, but this way we reduce the probability that our data is prioritized over someone else's data. It also increases the likelihood that what they are decrypting is useless data (letters to Aunt Millie) rather than meaningful data (your company books for the last year).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: NEVER
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TIME TO SUE GOOGLE & MICROSOFT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TIME TO SUE GOOGLE & MICROSOFT
I love your comment — and your ideas and ideals.
I want to add: I believe that a utility that randomizes the client's local MAC address (or at least the less-significant octets) would further aid in covering one's tracks, particularly in the event one happens to offend (by way of (for example) naming & shaming an individual amongst the ranks of...) our dear leaders or their criminal TLA henchmen.
Also, it is (IMO) needless to point out the "legality" of any particular action — (at least to those who are paying attention); in a nation where a war criminal gets a peace prize and an innocent pleb protecting his family gets a death sentence, persecutors instead of prosecutors — there is no law. Until/unless it gets fixed, we just have our own judgement: morality, humanism, risk assessment... These days I find the moral code of La Cosa Nostra to have more integrity than unfunny joke called the Department of "Justice."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SHUT THE NET DOWN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Feds threaten to arrest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Feds threaten to arrest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We've always had a democracy.
I don't think that word means what you think it means. We have a representative democracy (i.e. a republic) that has been gamed. But neither of those terms ceases to qualify because the representatives are not held accountable.
There are numerous ways for this to be fixed, some within the system, some peaceful. But those for whom the current regime is favorable are going to resist with all their might.
We may have a democracy at the end of it. It might be representative, and our representatives may actually serve the will of their constituents. But no matter what we have, there will always be forces trying to wrench the system back towards a dictatorship, if in tiny amounts.
Our constitutional framers knew this going in. The only thing they underestimated was the organizational powers of technology that sped the process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They wanted the master key
However, for technical reasons, virtually any such design has to have a master key to control the overall system of keys.
After thinking about this for a while, I'm guessing that what the government did was demand his master key. That would have allowed them to decrypt any message from any user, not just Snowden.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stifling Research
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stifling Research
And how are these 'special' rights 'leading you to war'? The only people picking a fight are the reactionary bigots who spout the same crap they have for nearly 200 years, losing every step of the way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't use any US based service - period.
Get rid of smartphones, too - don't pay for your own tracking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Our Government Is Scary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Our Government Is Scary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Outrageous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wave of the future in America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting out of contempt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would rather be terrorize by a real enemy than scrutinize by my government.
Eliminate their funding ASAP. Let's see how patriotic THEY are without funding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
N in NSA is for "Nelson"
*punch*
Stop incriminating yourself!
*punch*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tyranny
I always thought the patriot act went too far but now we see just how far beyond that we've gone.
There is no turning this ship around until the people stop seeing this as a pawn in the game of politics and realize that we are headed down a slippery slope - no matter who is in office at the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tyranny
Because, from where I'm sitting, the media outlets are complicit in the fascistic machinations of a small number of people (perhaps as few as 6).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same as the old boss.
Well, speaking as a raging liberal, I'm all for not this.
But what you are seeing is the human tendency towards community solidarity. Many vote according to their identity and not (as is our duty as voters in a democracy) according to our personal best interests. Hence gazillions of poor folk voting Republican because it's pro-family-values (e.g. hating on women and gays.)
The parties and their differences are a sham. The nation is drowning in Kool-aid. And it may fall in our lifetime because of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where Am I Living?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is somebody who could do something about this. His name is Obama. He's the guy running this show. It's not like the NSA is doing this without his oversight. It's his DOJ going after these whistleblowers, and attending to the FISC court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Prisoner
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lavabit
Stop before you destroy the country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...Werden wir einig und glücklich sein!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't forget
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time for conservatives to get over their Constitution-worship. Time for liberals to get over their "U.S. government is great if we could only ensure everyone participates" line.
The U.S. government and its Constitution ARE the problem. Read Lysander Spooner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scared
The Government gets called out for lying about Iran having nukes, We get 9/11, now we conceed
The government wants our guns, We get the Boston Marathon Fiasco, will we conceed???
Manning/Assange/Snowden et all. Lets see..hmm what was this BS that flew around last week about our embassies shutting
down because the Gov had good info that a plot was in the works, with the inferrance that it was the great and observant NSA that would save us from this threat...
It makes me afraid to wonder what kind of things they might come up with next, something to convince the people that these intrusions into our private lives are necessary for our safety.
Should we be thinking of how to go about monitering them before they make a plan to sacrafice another large number of us in the name of safety...Jesus who are these people
and what made them think that they have the right to play "Gods"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Government Survelience
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Mr. President (NSA/CIA/FBI/OHS/ABC/DEF/GHI/JKL/ETC)
9/11 did NOT change the constitution.
The Patriot Act is illegal, it violates the constitution.
The NSA snooping is illegal, it violates the constitution.
The FBI creating, funding and then arresting groups of people that they coerced into thinking about terrorist acts is the worst kind of entrapment, also illegal.
This means that all of you, up to and including you Mr. Obama are criminals, thugs, Constitutional Terrorists of the worst sort.
What you have done is just as bad as what Osama did on 9/11.
Worse in that you keep doing it, even when you've been caught red-handed.
Disband the NSA.
Disband the TSA.
Repeal The Patriot Act.
Arrest every member of the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, the TSA and OHS that had anything to do with tramping on our citizens rights.
Then you need to impeach yourself, step down, and go sit in a prison cell for the damage you've done to this country, it's people and the constitution which YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD.
All of you are a bunch of lying criminals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LAVABIT ISSUES
I found Lavabit very useful for my everyday emails, as i could send and receive through my isp (which i frequently change for economic reasons), without the need to keep changing email addresses.
Any sensible proprietor/government would allow at least one email to be snet out advising of the closure-this would make good business sense??
I have seen reports that about 350000 users have had their 'backs put up', with this closure? Whom does one blame, especially when one has to arrange a new email address at short notice and advise/change all the correspondents of this, something that took me a few hours!!
It does also make one wonder (myself not included), why so many people get an anti American attitude to things, especially where they are not fully explained? Posting of the court order onto the website should have given users some insight into what was going on-this cannot surely be against the law??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LAVABIT ISSUES
I would not trust any company in US with any data nowadays. They share it even with private companies. YES without you knowing it.
LavaBit's service -I think it was either this or everyone using it would of lost any trace of privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why do I feel like I've seen this movie before?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Path forward?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Experiment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Experiment
They seem eager to send the police after you for crap like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Experiment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Experiment
Offshore dissenters, when they're interesting enough, seem to get shuttled to one of our blacksite affiliates that torture for the president so that he can still say he doesn't.
If you have people who will miss you that might help, but in the past the US has been able to disappear people thoroughly enough to make Stalin jealous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's wrong
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Email Account
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]