NSA & FBI Spied On All Emails In Salt Lake City Before & After The Olympics
from the minimization? dept
We've already written about the latest NSA bombshell, which came via an article in the Wall Street Journal (which they stupidly put behind their paywall) by reporters Siobhan Gorman and Jennifer Valentino-Devries. But I wanted to focus in on one aspect that hasn't received very much attention -- the revelation that the NSA and the FBI teamed up to read every email and text communication in the Salt Lake City area before and after the Olympics there in 2002:For the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, officials say, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and NSA arranged with Qwest Communications International Inc. to use intercept equipment for a period of less than six months around the time of the event. It monitored the content of all email and text communications in the Salt Lake City area.At the time, Michael Hayden was in charge of the NSA, and today he remains one of the staunchest supporters of the NSA's surveillance, calling its opponents losers who can't get laid for daring to question the level of unconstitutional surveillance of our communications. Perhaps -- just perhaps -- he'd like to explain the legal rationale for spying on every digital communication. Sure, sure, this happened soon after September 11th, and I'm sure US officials were worried about the possibility of a terrorist attack on the winter Olympics. But, I don't recall us turning off the Constitution or ripping out the 4th Amendment just for the Olympics. Perhaps General Hayden, rather than random name calling, could share with us how such a project was possibly anywhere in the vicinity of legal at the time?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: email, fbi, michael hayden, nsa, nsa surveillance, olympics, privacy, salt lake city, utah
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I keep reading that and thinking that I probably get laid in a weekend more than this asshole has been laid in his whole life. And I'm in the opposition.
I don't recall us turning off the Constitution or ripping out the 4th Amendment just for the Olympics.
It is unfortunate but the world cup (football) and the olympics seem to override any country laws and constitutions in the name of pure corporate profit. Brazil being the most recent and scandalous example (there was a law enacted for the world cup that simply says "screw our current, established laws in favor of FIFA"). It's not that surprising to see such thing happening in the US. Actually no surprises at all except for the fact that it was concealed. I loathe both events for what they've become.
Perhaps General Hayden, rather than random name calling, could share with us how such a project was possibly anywhere in the vicinity of legal at the time?
He can't. Too busy wanking to the strawman he built in his mind about the opposition against these mass Constitution violations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I keep reading that and thinking "Has he ever heard of the ad hominem logical fallacy? If so, does he really think people won't recognize it?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ever listen to Rush Limbaugh, he has 4 million listerners who never recognize it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
well you've not met me
I get more love, than a hippie
ISG: Oh yea, well I got a degree
it tells me, that your full of pee
and crap, thats all you have
made up junk, to make you not look bad
Who Won? Who's Next? You decide!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
they had it for as long as the internet has existed !!! and before that too !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Im confused
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Im confused
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Im confused
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does it matter?
If this scandal is to have legs, the story needs concrete examples of abuses of information. They spied on everything in Salt Lake in 2002? Who cares? It was years ago! It didn't have any effect on anyone!
The above is not a useful narrative frame for critics of these programs.
For a more powerful narrative, you need to find examples of NSA misbehavior with this intercepted information, if there are any. Did government analysts pass around and mock funny intercepts? Make sports bets with inside information? Pass info off to the IRS or ATF for "parallel construction" of evidence?
They sucked up all this data, more than a decade ago. For a powerful narrative, prove the intercepts matter. Banality counts, but it needs to be humanized.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Does it matter?
They didn't steal a god damn microwave, THEY VIOLATED A NON TRIVIAL AMOUNT OF PEOPLES FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Does it matter?
"So, there's a statute of limitations on trampling of the constitution?"
If you want to seek damages from a court, there absolutely is. Although I think courts may give you some flexibility if there was a conspiracy to keep it secret which you just now learned about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Does it matter?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did You Know!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, as UK has no oversight
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
End to end encryption needed
1. Attach your public key to every outgoing email.
2. Recipient receives email with public key, their email program asks if they trust the key, if so accept it and record it for that email address. That X email address has public key Xp.
3. All outgoing emails encrypted with the public key if known for each email address.
4. If a different key arrives from that email warn user of possible man-in-the-middle attack, so they can verify the key a different way (e.g. phone call).
5. Webmail can also attach the keys, but then its only as secure as the webmail provider.
6. Let user manually enter public keys, to avoid first time man-in-the-middle attacks, so they can install their key when they visit their family and friends. For extra security.
We're programmer FFS, we can fix this. Currently the encrypted options fail in two respects:
They're not automatic.
They distribute the key via third parties in some needlessly complex method.
They use certificate authorities, which is inherently bad practice.
They force the user to make the 'encrypted/not-encrypted' choice on each email.
A much simpler system like the one outlined will simply work.
You can even add the public key to the 'mailto:' html tag definition, so that companies can distribute secure mail addresses on their https websites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the price for saying the truth..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mitt Romney was the
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]