MLK Jr.'s Sons Celebrate 50th Anniversary Of 'I Have A Dream' By Suing His Daughter
from the making-dad-proud-the-only-way-they-know-how dept
Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream, a dream that one day his sons would sue his daughter over the control of his body of work -- and on the fiftieth anniversary of his famous speech. As he boldly stated 50 years ago, the only way to ensure racial harmony is through familial infighting.
If Dr. King were alive today, along with having to offer his opinion on Miley Cyrus, he'd be shocked to hear his famous speech paraphrased this way -- and his legacy being handled in this fashion. He would also likely be astonished that each anniversary of his speech is marked by vanishing Youtube videos and the arrival of DMCA notices and cease and desist orders.
But that's what we have, thanks to his legacy being "safeguarded" by siblings who sue each other.
In a lawsuit filed Aug. 28 in Fulton County Court, the Estate of Martin Luther King Jr. Inc. -- run by King's sons, Martin Luther King III and Dexter King -- claims it licensed the civil rights activist's intellectual property rights to The Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change in March 2009."Supports it," but only up to a point, apparently. Not that Bernice King is exactly blameless.
The King Center's CEO is Bernice King, the youngest child of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who was assassinated in 1968.
Dr. King's estate claims it supports the center's mission to maintain King's legacy and has been the nonprofit's single largest individual donor for the past decade.
[I]t says the center has been careless with Dr. King's intellectual property, which includes the leader's "name, image, recorded voice and memorabilia," along with "all works of authorship ... including writings, speeches, sermons, letters and copyrights," trademark interests, and "the remains and coffin contained within the crypt of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr."So, on one hand, we have King's estate, which has never missed an opportunity to capitalize on the "I have a dream" speech and, on the other, someone who clearly doesn't value what they have. If nothing else, Bernice King should put her soon-to-be-gone collection the hands of people (other than her siblings) who know the value of returning certain "property" to the public. (Perhaps someone like this history professor:)
The estate says it conducted an audit in April, which "revealed that the current manner of care and storage of the physical property by defendant is unacceptable." It claims the items are "susceptible to damage by fire, water, mold, and mildew, as well as theft."
King's sons say they tried to work with their sister to fix the problems, but the relationship "has recently become strained, resulting in a total breakdown in communication and transparency."
And King's estate holders need to return a speech given publicly back to public and stop turning this momentuous event into nothing more than a series of transactions. His sons have to have some idea of how the public views their mercenary exploits. They can't be that obtuse, can they? Or do they think their father would be proud to know his voice and likeness is more likely to be used to emancipate people from lousy wireless service than to be spread throughout the internet in order to inspire new generations of Americans?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, i have a dream, lawsuits, martin luther king jr.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If Martin Luther King were alive today, you'd be spying on him just like J. Edgar Hoover did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
i *wish* that would leave a mark, but i'm thinking saint obama is just as sociopathic as the rest of them...
only, obama/et al are WORSE than j edna hoover: he only targeted a relative few high-profile loudmouths and dissenters; while choco jesu is 'targeting' EVERYONE...
where are today's welch that says, 'at long last, have you no shame...'
unfortunately, i know the answer to that one: no, they don't have any shame...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Look as something as OLD as Mickey Mouse and it's still Copyrighted and it should have expired long ago, and yet somehow it's been extended a few times. Once again never ending!!! Nothing these days seem to expire. It goes on and on and on and on instead of into the Public Domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Next time, just point out how they're "good for nothing lazy kids", and it will be valid no matter the race of the subject. The disclaimer doesn't negate the fact that you singled out a race for criticism. Just stick to singling out greedy people who'd rather ride their dead ancestors' coattails than work for a living, and we'll all agree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He's right you know. Just look at some of those other lazy blacks riding on their dead parent's coattails. Like J.R.R. Tolkien's son, The Walton heirs, generations of Rockefellers, F. Scott Fitzgerald's descendants, and the list goes on and on.
Just so you know I was being sarcastic. Normally I wouldn't bother to point that out, but since you don't seem to get irony ("NOT racist" followed by ending your post with a racist comment) I wanted to be clear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Absolutely racist
Are you really so dumb as to suggest this isn't racist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In fact I wonder if he actually willed ownership of his speech to his kids anyway. If he didn't, wouldn't that mean he didn't see it as property?
Either way, maybe I should include in my will a line that says that my kids can't be fighting over my possessions for 50 years or they lose it all...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Video Copyrights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Video Copyrights
not that i dont agree copywrite has gotten out of control. Trademarks are even worse thou
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You dont get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You dont get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't forget Bob Jones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guess you saw the words "copyright" and "trademark"...
The King estate is a long-running saga of greed similar to no others. It's an anomaly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anomalies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anomalies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess you saw the words "copyright" and "trademark"...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guess you saw the words "copyright" and "trademark"...
The King estate is a long-running saga of greed similar to many others. It's the norm.
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Like Everything Else in IP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Retroactive extensions are a horrible thing, but that's what a little lobbying from Disney gets you...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously
Or am i wrong and did he only make the speech so eh could make money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seriously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This really sucks. . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright as an incentive to be nonproductive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]