Why Won't Eric Holder Guarantee First Amendment Rights For Journalists?

from the shameful dept

Fri, Sep 27th 2013 1:28pm — Mike Masnick

On September 18th, John Cusak wrote a rather powerful open letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, asking if he'll guarantee the First Amendment rights of Glenn Greenwald and Laura Potras, two American journalists at the center of the Ed Snowden leak reporting.

Put simply, will Attorney General Eric Holder, the US State Department, and the FBI promise safe passage to journalists, their spouses and loved ones, and vow not to interfere with their reporting on these NSA stories?

So far, the answer has been far from clear.

Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, the two American journalists at the center of these stories, have been doing their reporting from Brazil and Germany respectively. The US government has not, so far, stated publicly whether they can enter the country without receiving the same outrageous treatment that Miranda received. Or worse.

Can they practice journalism in the United States, without their hard drives being confiscated, without an unconstitutional search-and-seizure taking place at the border? Are they free to enter the United States without being served a subpoena, or even jailed? Unlike the UK, the United States is supposed to be bound by the first amendment of the constitution, which exists to bar such treatment of journalists.

And, of course, it goes well beyond those two (as Cusack acknowledges). The recent story of On The Media producer Sarah Abdurrahman and her family and friends (all US citizens) being detained at the border for no real reason (other than the obvious: the fact that they were Muslims, which is not a reason to detain them), highlights how the Constitution-free situation at the US border is incredibly problematic and chilling for journalists.

At the very least, the US government should provide an answer as to whether or not it will respect the freedom of American journalists to come back into their own country, but so far, Holder has remained silent.

The federal government keeps talking about how it wants to regain the trust of the American people. One way to do that would be to stop intimidating and spying on journalists -- even those critical of the administration's practices -- and to let them do their reporting. After all, the best way to build up the trust is to allow those journalists to do their jobs, only to discover that there's nothing legitimate to attack. The only reason to go after them would be if the administration knows that there are plenty of things to hide that will make them look bad. And then we're right back to the reason that there's no trust.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: eric holder, first amendment, free speech, glenn greenwald, john cusack, laura poitras, nsa, nsa surveillance

24 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

SolkeshNaranek (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:38pm

DOJ naswer
>At the very least, the US government should provide an answer as to whether or not it will respect the freedom of American journalists to come back into their own country

I think Holder and the DOJ has already given their answer. It is fairly plain to see if you stop and think about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:42pm

Misunderstanding...
The federal government keeps talking about how it wants to regain the trust of the American people.

No, you misunderstood them:

The federal government keeps talking about how it wants to remand the American people in a truss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DCL, 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:54pm
  
  Re: Misunderstanding...
  The federal government keeps talking about how it wants to reign the trust of the American people
  
  Fixed that for you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:06pm
    
    Re: Re: Misunderstanding...
    Ok, better...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:50pm

Really?
Its like asking a little kid if he did it. You know he did. But the kid will say whatever comes to mind to divert the issue.
-
"The federal government keeps talking about how it wants to regain the trust of the American people." Do you believe the prostitute that tells you what an animal you are and how big it is? (WTF with the hookers and me today. 3rd reference)At least when the hooker screws you there is a brief happy ending.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Namel3ss (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:55pm
  
  Re: Really?
  Speaking of which, why is a defense contractor a lot like a DC hooker?
  
  A: They both charge the government $100 a screw.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Binko Barnes (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:56pm

Because we now live is a Crony-Capitalist Oligarchy and Eric Holder answers to his corporate masters alone.

He is assured of many many millions of dollars from his future law partnership, speaking fees and seats of various boards - as long as he does what's expected and doesn't rock the boat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 1:58pm

asking if he'll guarantee the First Amendment rights of Glenn Greenwald and Laura Potras, two American journalists at the center of the Ed Snowden leak reporting.

Based on the established history of Laura Poitras being detained multiple times for no reason beyond harrassment, I'd say the answer is "No."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:03pm

i think the American people have been kept in the dark too long and have left things too late to be able to do anything much about what is going on in the USA, how it is being run, who is really in charge and what the true aims are. even when there were suspicions of 'unsavory conduct', either nothing was done or it was prevented from being done. when US Senators cant get answers, what chance has the people?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
limbodog (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:06pm

Hah. Seriously, would anyone believe them if they said yes? I certainly wouldn't. I'd come to the border with an encrypted hard-drive filled with 50 gigs of Photoshopped porn featuring the faces of Eric Holder and James Clapper and refuse to give them my password. Let 'em spend the time to decrypt that sucker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:54pm
  
  Re:
  Oh I'd do much, much worse...
  
  In that situation I'd have the 50 gig drive encrypted several times over, containing nothing more than countless copies of the one document they fear the most, the one where even mentioning it is considered taboo, even the slightest quote from it is considered blasphemy...
  
  The Constitution.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:07pm

They want the trust of the americam people, but they won't change their behavior to deserve it. Instead they'll pull a false flag and frame up some patsies. They will then give themselves awards and money to demonstrate how much the american people should trust them. It's a show. It has always been a show.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:18pm

has anyone thought about the fact that the government dont want the truth to get at all? that all it wants is to become a replica of the very regime it helped destroy 70 Years ago? as soon as it can achieve that, it will progress. it already has countries like the UK and Sweden shitting their pants, so are 'carrying the flag further afield. instead of actually making a war by firing weapons, the USG is doing it via 'Trade Agreements'. they are just as effective but destroy countries economically by removing their rights to use, purchase from anyone other than already US agreed countries or make their own, cheaper clones. there are already law suits going on by US companies against other countries for denying them the all clear to sell their products. when a country has to choose between looking after it's citizens by preventing a certain medical drug, for example, from being available and being sued by a company that thinks it has the right to do what it wants, regardless of the consequences, simply because it wants to up it's profits, things have gotten pretty bad! and it is now a clause that is being included in all 'Trade Negotiation Documents'! and you can bet your ass that even if that 'clause' is removed as it is originally, it will be back in somewhere, worded slightly differently, but mean the same, with the same clout! and the only country that will gain is the USA! God Bless America! fuck the rest of the world!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:39pm

The American public already has an answer to what the government is by the face shown them. All anyone has to do is look at Manning or Snowden to see just how it is. These are whistle blowers, plain out and simple like. That's not how they've been treated.

Couple this is a surveillance agency gone rabid, the fact that it turns over evidence to be used by prosecutors and demands the source of the evidence be held secret, that nearly the entire government is trying to hide that and still at the same time claim it's legal by attempting to change the meanings of the English language, the absolute refusal of owning up to exactly what it has been doing while claiming not to do it and to claim it's being transparent in the process, and top it off with dancing around very valid questions, submitted in advance, with just plain out ignoring them as a way to refuse to answer.

Yeah, the American people get the picture. That's why the government has lost the trust of the public. It's going to take more than just wishing to get that trust back. It's going to take actual doing, with verification of it done, with real (not make believe) oversight, and the heads that made this madness occur need to be removed from office and held accountable.

So far, being held accountable seems to be a foreign idea when it comes to bankers, politicians, and security. As long as it is, there is no trust in government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 2:41pm

Why Won't Eric Holder Guarantee First Amendment Rights?

FTFY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ipgrunt (profile), 27 Sep 2013 @ 4:31pm

Us vs. Them
Like the Nixon administration, the Obama admin exhibits a certain paranoia, a siege mentality, a denial of legal and political reality, and an "us vs. them" attitude, while at the same time, the mainstream press ignores these issues, refuses to ask embarrassing questions, and tacitly cooperates with the general deception. Leading congressional democrats play doublespeak or offer deliberate misinformation, while insisting that there is nothing illegal about NSA's spying.

Of course, there are another dozen three-letter agencies that also spy on Americans, with federal bureau of ineptitude having a long history of private files on many public figures dating back to the Hoover administration (and I don't mean Herbert).

As already noted, most Americans are happily viewing Dancing with the Stars and couldn't care less about invasions of privacy and the steady erosion of basic constitutional rights. We passed the second of the patriot acts almost ten years ago -- Snowden's "leaks" only skim the surface of its ramifications upon freedom in America.

Remember the talk of revoking Patriot II? It all disappeared when Obama threatened to bomb Syria. Mission accomplished.

The facts show that not only is the First Amendment in jeopardy, but also 2, 4, 5, 6 and 8.

And this trend did not start with Obama. The question is, who does he, and past presidents, serve? Certainly not the American people -- only our "vital interests."

There is certainly something fundamentally wrong about our government, but it goes much deeper than allowing 2 journalists to travel freely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zem, 27 Sep 2013 @ 7:05pm

We all know modern day journalists aren't "real americans" and such are not protected by the constitution.

The historical record clearly shows that the real american journalist wares a cape and gets changed in a phone booth.

I suspect the difficulty you now have in actually finding a phone booth may be a government plot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rekrul, 27 Sep 2013 @ 10:37pm
  
  Re:
  The historical record clearly shows that the real american journalist wares a cape and gets changed in a phone booth.
  
  Actually, Clark Kent is an illegal alien. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to know if Superman was ever granted US citizenship, but how would Clark ever be made a citizen without having to reveal his place of origin? Or did Superman reveal his identity at some point? Or was Superman given a pass both for himself and his unknown secret identity?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous, 28 Sep 2013 @ 1:19pm
    
    Re: Re:
    A while back (issue 900, I believe), Superman renounced his American citizenship.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2013 @ 7:36pm

We all know why, because he fully intends to harass and persecute those that oppose his views.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Old Man in The sea, 28 Sep 2013 @ 1:58am

Why should he?
What is obvious from an outsider is that you have the government you deserve. How many of you even vote today for your representatives?

As each year passes, it seems like more and more of you fail to see that the power is actually in your hands. You actually have the ability to vote the turkeys out. It doesn't matter how much money is backing these men and women for advertising, it just requires the electorate to think about the things that matter and apply their vote to bring about change.

Yet you are more concerned about your right not to vote than you are about using your vote and doing something about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btrussell (profile), 28 Sep 2013 @ 6:48am
  
  Re: Why should he?
  You trust them to count the votes?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
dd, 28 Sep 2013 @ 7:41am

Fear of the Truth
There is nothing Obama fears more than the TRUTH! That is why Holder and Obama attack any journalist or news outlet that tells the truth about Obama Administration corruption and incompetence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 30 Sep 2013 @ 4:30am

Eric Holder? Guaranteeing first amendment rights? Pfft. First he'll try to guarantee his own grandstanding and high profile case. Then he'll pretend everything is alright whatever the outcome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]