Misleading Figures Used To Puff Up Importance Of Intellectual Monopolies In Europe

from the lies,-damned-lies,-and-statistics dept

Thu, Oct 3rd 2013 11:49am — Glyn Moody

We've noted before attempts to inflate the importance of copyright, patents and trademarks by including a bunch of other sectors that are only tangentially related to them when it comes to totting up their economic impact. For example, last year Mike wrote about a joint Department of Commerce/US Patent and Trademark Office "study" that included 2.5 million grocery store jobs in its definition of "IP-intensive" industries.

Now the Europeans are getting in on the act. The European Patent Office and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, responsible for trademarks and designs in Europe, have come out with a very similar study, which uses exactly the same technique as the earlier USPTO/Department of Commerce work, as James Love explains:

On September 30, 2013, the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) published their own knock off version [of the US study], titled "Intellectual Property Rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Europe", which claimed that 39 percent of total economic activity in the EU is "generated by IPR-intensive industries."

Like the USPTO study, the numbers are intended to mislead rather than inform debate on intellectual property. The following is a quick rundown of some of the employment numbers in the report, for various IP categories.

Designs
For "design intensive industries," the largest employer group, by far, is "Wholesale of clothing and footwear," which is just one of several "wholesale" categories designed as "Design intensive industries."

Patents
For "patent intensive industries," the list of top industries is mostly made up of various manufacturing sectors. "Research and experimental development on biotechnology" is listed as having just 47 thousand EU jobs, out of more than 22 million "patent intensive" jobs in the study.

Copyright
For the copyright industry, the study claims there are over 7,049,405 jobs in the EU. But where are they? Book publishing is listed at 317,150, Sound recording and music publishing activities at 37,750, and Publishing of journals and periodicals just 13,300... Libraries and archives, on the other hand, are listed as a "copyright intensive industry" with 397.800 jobs -- 5.6 percent of all copyright intensive jobs.

The following 11 industries make up more than 55% of all jobs that are considered copyright intensive, even though copyright is only an incidental factor for most of their activities: Advertising agencies 388.500 (5.1%)
Library and archives activities 397.800 (5.6%)
Media representation 797.900 (11.3%)
Other amusement and recreation activities 220.950 (3.1%)
Other information service activities n.e.c. 994.600 (14.1%)
Performing arts support activities 266.950 (3.8%)
Performing arts 85.800 (1.2%)
Public relations and communication activities 162.800 (2.3%)
Publishing of directories and mailing lists 231.500 (3%)
Translation and interpretation activities 152.000 (2.2%)
Web portals 191.300 (2.7%)
The European Commission lost no time touting the new study: Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier said: "I am convinced that intellectual property rights play a hugely important role in stimulating innovation and creativity, and I welcome the publication of this study which confirms that the promotion of IPR is a matter of growth and jobs. It will help us to further underpin our evidence-based policy making.
Of course, it does nothing of the sort, because the "evidence" cited here is so misleading as to be worthless. What Barnier really means is that he will continue to push the dogma that intellectual monopolies like patents and copyright are needed to stimulate innovation and creativity, and that he will ignore real evidence to the contrary, falling back instead on easily-debunked work like the present document from the EPO and OHIM.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, economics, europe, intellectual property, patents, trademark

14 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ninja (profile), 3 Oct 2013 @ 10:33am

By that logic IP is responsible for humanity reaching so far after they stood up and stopped being apes (don't laugh). I mean, miners gather minerals needed so hollywood can have it's gadgets made, oil field workers too and what about farmers? What would it be of them if Hollywood didn't eat! Of course the much less mentioned yacht manufacturers, drug dealers and brothel owners would also be unemployed.

Let reason, logic and sanity ka-ching!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Zakida Paul (profile), 3 Oct 2013 @ 11:55am

Forget God, forget evolution, forget the big bang.

IP is responsible for the creation of the planet, and creating and sustaining life. All you plebs would do well to remember it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Duke (profile), 3 Oct 2013 @ 11:58am

Reading through the report there are some interesting industries listed as IP-intensive, including:

Manufacture of kitchen furniture,
Wholesale of fruit and vegetables,
Sea and coastal passenger water transport,
Buying and selling of own real estate,
Media representation,
Market research and public opinion polling,
Rental and leasing of trucks,
Gambling and betting activities

Apparently when you are in a society where branding is everything, and you measure IP-intensity by "do they use trade marks", almost everyone ends up being IP-intensive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wec, 3 Oct 2013 @ 12:11pm

It seems to me that some of these industries would hire more people if there were very little patent or copyright enforcement.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2013 @ 12:21pm

This just goes to show the importance of strong IP laws.
Without them, other countries are able to infringe on our study techniques.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bengie, 3 Oct 2013 @ 12:49pm

Poison
Of people who have been poisoned and survived, 100% of all of those people took poison before getting sick.

It is our conclusion that taking poison before being poisoned is the only way to have a chance of living after being poisoned.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2013 @ 12:51pm

Re:
What is depressing is that the politicians will believe this report, or at least use it to justify even more repressive IP laws.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2013 @ 2:36pm

Re:
The claim that still baffles me is the 397,800 "library and archive" jobs. These are the jobs that take copyrighted material and loan it out to the public for free. Using those jobs as support for intellectual property rights is like using charity soup kitchens as support for five-star restaurants.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2013 @ 3:04pm

Re:
Except for kitchen furniture where design patents are a'plenty, and market research and public opinion polling which relies on copyright, the rest are almost devoid of anything IP-intensive.

Using trademarks as a sole reason for "IP stimulating innovation" is completely arbitrary. Somehow the existance of an owned trademark doesn't change the market for a product as such, nor does it do anything positive for innovation (if anything it is taking money away from innovation and putting it into superfluous image management).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2013 @ 3:15pm

funny how the politicians manage to jump in to use these sort of ridiculous, untruthful figures but at the same time manage to ignore facts such as those in this article

http://torrentfreak.com/piracy-isnt-hurting-the-entertainment-industry-121003/

like so many other reports, when the truth is published, it is immediately ignored, ridiculed or just dismissed.

Barnier is as big a tosser as who he took over from. if the truth slapped him repeatedly in the face, he would still be able to dismiss it as rubbish, just to keep his masters of the entertainment industries sweet! we might never get truthful, genuine politicians to act on those truths, but it would make a change if they acknowledged them, instead of throwing them in the rubbish pile!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Duke (profile), 3 Oct 2013 @ 3:21pm

Re: Re:
I would suggest that Market Research and Public Opinion Polling doesn't rely too much on copyright (or shouldn't be able to) as they are about gathering facts, which cannot be restricted by copyright. The reports they produce might be, but the information isn't.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jay (profile), 3 Oct 2013 @ 6:52pm

What the...?
Can someone explain this to me?

When did libraries need copyright to account for 5% of the industry?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2013 @ 12:35am

Re: Re:
Yes, and a key point is that even if copyright didn't exist we would still have libraries.

Libraries existed long before copyright and will still exist long after.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2013 @ 7:59am

Follow the money where did this begin and who's funding it which political puppets are being paid and by whom how much and what jobs will they hold once out of public office ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]