Tables Turned On Former NSA Boss Michael Hayden, As 'Off-The-Record' Call Is Live Tweeted By Train Passenger

from the no-expectation-of-privacy-on-a-train dept

Fri, Oct 25th 2013 3:25am — Mike Masnick

Michael Hayden, former NSA and CIA boss, who famously argued that the only people complaining about NSA surveillance were internet shut-ins who couldn't get laid, apparently never learned that when you're in a public place, someone might overhear your phone calls. Entrepreneur and former MoveOn.org director Tom Matzzie just so happened to be on the Acela express train from DC to NY when he (1) spotted Hayden sitting behind him and (2) started overhearing a series of "off the record" phone calls with press about the story of the week: the revelations of the NSA spying on foreign leaders. Matzzie did what any self-respecting American would do: live-tweet the calls. During the calls Hayden apparently slammed the Obama administration, while insisting he only be quoted as a "former senior administration official."

I'm sure Hayden will be happy about this. After all, as I'm sure he'd be the first to argue, he had no expectation of privacy in such a situation, right? In the end, it appears someone in his office spotted the tweets, and alerted Hayden who ended up taking a photo with Matzzie and having a short conversation with him.

A bunch of the tweets are below:

Former NSA spy boss Michael Hayden on Acela behind me blabbing "on background as a former senior admin official" Sounds defensive.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Hayden talking about a famous blackberry now.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Hayden was bragging about rendition and black sites a minute ago.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Michael Hayden on Acela giving reporters disparaging quotes about admin. "Remember, just refer as former senior admin" #exNSAneedsadayjob
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

On Acela: Michael Hayden was talking to Massimo Calabresi at TIME I am pretty sure. Does he tweet?
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

On Acela listening to former NSA spy boss Michael Hayden give "off record" interviews. I feel like I'm in the NSA. Except I'm in public.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

On Acela: phone ringing. I think the jig is up. Maybe somebody is telling him I'm here. Do I hide?
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

New call. I am totally busted I think.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

I think I'm safe. Just passed Philly. No rendition yet. Do I have the balls to ask him for a photo? #haydenacela
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

On Acela: Hayden's comments to press were clearly about NSA spying on foreign allies. #haydenacela
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Win pic.twitter.com/tsJHqjv1LM
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

I just had a very nice conversation with Michael Hayden. He was a gentleman and we disagree.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

On the pic. His office called him and then he graciously offered me an interview. We talked around the 4th amendment and foreign spying.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

I have to say. I'm actually a little afraid. The intelligence world is kind of dark and scary.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Hayden just left train in Newark. He touched my back...again. I think a stop short actually.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

Getting off train soon. Somebody email my wife and explain all this.
— Tom Matzzie (@tommatzzie) October 24, 2013

For all the talk from the NSA folks how revealing how we collect phone information will lead terrorists to use other means... the fact that an ex-NSA boss would give such calls in a public place like this makes it pretty clear that even if you know if others eavesdrop on you, and you're supposedly an "expert" on this stuff, sometimes people just take a chance anyway. And sometimes it doesn't work so well.

Of course, Hayden's response to all of this is to blame "liberal activists" for this "bullshit" story, while insisting that Matzzie's statements about what the calls were about were "terribly wrong." As if anyone's going to believe that.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: acela, eavesdropping, michael hayden, nsa, nsa surveillance, off the record, tom matzzie

33 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ninja (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 2:33am

That's a nice way of "educating" these people on how privacy is necessary. Obviously you can't expect privacy if you are talking about something in a public place since people will accidentally overhear it but I'm fairly sure that people have other means of having more private conversations (ie: going to a private cabin, texting, e-mailing etc). And there's the fact that those people don't know where have you been, with who you are talking, how many times you talked with that person, what's your relationship with them (one can infer only). The problem comes when you can't expect such privacy because there are loons recording your communications because of some stupid bogeyman. I don't think Hayden learned the lesson. But it's a good example to throw at the NSA fanboys faces.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 3:44am

Context of the story/phone call is important too. That's why they need all the metadata.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 3:58am
  
  Re:
  And it still doesn't mean a shit because the context may be shared by the participants and the data associated with the call gives nothing but a false positive.
  
  Let's exercise our imagination: imagine a couple that enjoy doing the pimp/hooker fantasy. He calls her a prostitute and she says she'll pay with sex for something he paid her. They know they are joking but does simple metadata reveal such context? I don't think so. This is but one example that's close to me (I personally do it and I know two more couples that are into it) but I'm sure there are several others where no amount of detail will lead to the context as easily as you imply.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 5:21am
    
    Re: Re:
    I was really sure I didn't need to /sarc that comment but I guess I was wrong.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:51am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Yeah, I failed the sarcasm check and laughed at my ineptitude ;D
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Real Michael, 25 Oct 2013 @ 7:06am
  
  Re:
  I'm amazed that people actually buy this notion that the NSA is obtaining just the metadata on phone calls while ignoring the content of the conversations. Dream on.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:33am
    
    Re: Re:
    What if the metadata was far more revealing, intrusive, vague than the actual content ?
    What if the content could absolve you but the metadata convicts you ?
    
    Just the metadata is probably more scary than the content.
    
    So you shared a meeting in a coffee shop with a "radical". GPS metadata told them.
    You visited similar "radical" websites. Metadata told them.
    You respond to a "radical" on twitter. That damn metadata.
    
    Next thing you know you are part of a web of "radicals"... metadata told them. The content could explain everything. Coffee shop was a coincidence, websites were just you following links to interesting stories or maybe even an accident and the communication on twitter was an argument.
    
    Metadata is seriously bad enough. It is so vague that everyone can be set up for practically anything.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Rikuo (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 9:19am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Guy in coffee shop looks up the effects of acid on human decomposition. He then initiates a Skype IM chat with an ex-con who had been jailed for muder with such phrases as "we'll slaughter the fuckers" and "I can't wait to see their faces after the acid".
      Metadata and actually going through the IM logs will lead one to suspect that they're planning a real murder spree.
      Nope. Turns out the guy in the coffee shop was a law student, looking up information for his classes; while the chat with his friend was about an online game (pretty sure there must be one by now that has acid in it).
      
      There's one hypothetical example.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - kitsune361, 25 Oct 2013 @ 10:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Every played Payday 2? Ever used Skype for voice comms? I'm pretty sure that game has gotten all my friends on some sort of watch list.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Infamous Joe (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 9:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You could almost say that just the metadata is worse, because it lacks context that would be given by the content.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:05am

anyone know when Tom Matzzie is going to be arrested and charged with espionage, treason, unauthorised communication of speech (from a prat!) and any other that can be drummed up, so as to get him thrown into prison? when are the first knocks on the door with the 'men in black suits' expected?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:11am
  
  Re:
  Maybe they'll also charge him with 17 counts of hacking, to boot. Make that sentence go up to 5000 years in jail.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
  
  Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:32am
  
  Re:
  Don't know, but I think the fashion police are after him !
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:24am

Photo or it didn't happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rich, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:39am
  
  Re:
  I assume that's a joke.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Killer_Tofu (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 6:29am
    
    Re: Re:
    Obviously.
    Everybody knows the phrase for seriousness is pics or didn't happen.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capt ICE Enforcer, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:47am

No charges needed
Capt ICE Enforcer here,

For all of you wanting charges brought against this man, please sit down and be quiet. The United States was deemed a war zone and with the indefinite detention without trial all I have to do is walk up with a SWAT team and have him detained. Why waste time having trial. After all, it will provide him a warm fuzzy knowing we care
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 4:54am

At least Hayden admitted one thing...
�Would you like a real interview?� he asked Matzzie.

�I�m not a reporter,� Matzzie replied.

�Everybody�s a reporter,� said Hayden.

So he now admits that freedom of the press protections extend to EVERYONE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 5:09am
  
  Re: At least Hayden admitted one thing...
  And that everything is monitored after all they did catch the tweeting.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 7:53am
    
    Re: Re: At least Hayden admitted one thing...
    Eh. Twitter is SUPPOSED to be monitored. It's kind of the whole point of the service to be something that people can choose to monitor.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:54am
      
      Re: Re: Re: At least Hayden admitted one thing...
      Indeed you have a point but it seems creepy when the Govt is doing with major efficiency. It's one thing to have a horde of tweens monitoring if for One Direction stuff and someone calling attention to some event and another if it's the Govt doing so. Maybe it's just me
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 5:41am
  
  Re: At least Hayden admitted one thing...
  Now we just need lawmakers and judges to realize that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 5:02am

"Hayden's response to all of this is to blame "liberal activists" for this "bullshit" story"

Perhaps some extraordinary rendition is in order, send Hayden to Gitmo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich Fiscus (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 5:27am

If the NSA can't figure out how to keep their own phone calls to themselves why should we believe they're any more careful with ours?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 6:02am

Hopefully, this will make Hayden be extremely careful in what he says out loud. I remember a past article from here on Techdirt about lawyers for detainees in Gitmo, where the lawyers know that all their lines of communication are tapped, and thus, barely say anything. Let's let Hayden experience what that is like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Larry (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 7:22am

Common sense and arrogance
Anybody in government, business, or private life should know that there are things you don't talk about in public.

My wife was riding the train to work one day and sat near two people talking about how they were going to con another department into taking on a project that they had messed up far beyond recovery. Three hours later she walked into a meeting where they were to plan the procedures for transferring the project to her department. She said the look on their faces when she was introduced as a senior manager was priceless. They did not take the project.

Hayden knows the rules. I guess a case of legendary arrogance is what is required to lead this countries intelligence agencies. That and the assumption that you never have to pay for your sins.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:23am

This guy is an now an Internet legend. He even made sure to get a pic as proof.

Classic case of doing it right.
Tom Matzzie has all my internets for today. Well played.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alt0, 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:29am

Taxpayer $$$
Well, at least he was on the train saving me some $$$.
I thought all these clowns booked jets?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:31am

Tables Turned On Former NSA Boss Michael Hayden
I didn't know Hayden rode trains all day and tweeted about conversations he overhears !!! Or wore shirts that don't fit, and ask people to 'chat up his wife' !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Fenderson (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 8:46am

Astonishing
One would think that Hayden would understand the basics of discretion. It's not just the chance that some random person will overheard and tweet stuff.

I once knew a person whose full time job was to take the commuter flights into and out of silicon valley and listen to the conversations around him to try and gain inside information about what high tech companies were up to. I can't imagine this is a practice unique to high-tech espionage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rikuo (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 9:22am
  
  Re: Astonishing
  I have to disbelieve you on the basis that the paranoid TSA would have flagged your friend long ago, due to the insane number of flights he would have had to have taken.
  
  No wait, a re-read now means I believe you. You said you once knew, past tense. This means your friend was picked up and imprisoned for the heinous crime of travelling by plane too many times and hasn't seen a human being since then. I actually wouldn't be surprised. What with Gitmo and this
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFy8sW9KgOg
  (long story short, a man was picked up on a DUI and then literally forgotten about in solitary confinement for years)...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Fenderson (profile), 25 Oct 2013 @ 9:50am
    
    Re: Re: Astonishing
    What he was doing isn't illegal, and this was well before the TSA existed.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2013 @ 10:38am

Important Distinction
This was a random circumstance where someone overheard what he was saying, albeit in a private conversation to someone else, in PUBLIC. That is very different then actively seeking access to someone's private communications, like the NSA does.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]