NSA's Talking Points On Snowden Leaks Say To Emphasize 9/11
from the these-sound-very-familiar dept
If you've been following all the NSA stuff, you're used the regular claims from the NSA's defenders. The folks over at Al Jazeera were able to get the talking points that the NSA has been using in response to the Snowden leaks, and they're exactly everything we've been hearing -- with extra emphasis on playing up 9/11. My favorite talking point, described as a "sound bite that resonates" is:I much prefer to be here today explaining these programs, than explaining another 9/11 event that we were not able to prevent.You'll also note an awful lot of "we need to connect the dots," though they leave out the part about how having more data actually makes it harder to connect the dots. They also play up the "over 50 cases" of dealing with "terrorist events" -- a number that has since been totally debunked.
The documents are the basic talking points that Keith Alexander, James Clapper and others have been using in their various Congressional hearings. If you watched the hearing yesterday, for example, you'd notice that Clapper especially was almost always reading off the talking points even when asked questions (Alexander appears to feel more comfortable "winging it"). Given that, there's not much that's totally surprising -- we've heard all of this. But it's still fascinating to see it in black and white.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ed snowden, james clapper, keith alexander, nsa, nsa surveillance, talking points
Reader Comments
The First Word
“you know what the bad thing is?
even AL QAEDA does not talk about 9/11 this much anymore.Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unfortunately, people still depend on NYT/WSJ and other sources that aren't willing to cover reality like criticism of the NSA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Al Jazeera arabic seems to hold a different perspective entirely. It is much more entrenched in the arabic culture and that colours the way they angle their stories.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
After reading this document, Clapper, Rogers and Feinstein are doing an absolutely pathetic job in defending the NSA.
I feel better in reading this document than in any of their statements to the press or Congress so far.
Things I learned from this document:
1. They recognize and respect the 4th Amendment.
2. They don't like being spied on themselves.
3. They seem pretty certain to not spy on a US Citizen without a FISA warrant.
4. They actually have a 4-page checklist they follow in regards to American citizens.
5. They review searches periodically to ensure people aren't just making random searches for personal reasons.
6. They are careful to point out that they don't ask foreign governments as a way to sidestep 1-4.
I don't recall anyone mentioning any of these in response to questions. Instead it's all bluster and megalomaniac personalities.
Now, whether they actually do what they are saying in this document is another matter, but at least they're not saying: "Never mention that we talk to foreign governments to sidestep the 4th Amendment."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
What I marvel at is that anyone comes here! WHAT is the value that you provide, Mike? Your breathtakingly non-committal comments? I admit I'm behind on most trends, but has news been so trivilized that you can get away with just saying this is "fascinating"? ... I await your fanboy-trolls saying, "yes, this is great, we really are that shallow..."
Techdirt. Dumpster-diving to recycle "news."
07:59:15[i-482-6]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
And I thought you come here for the secret police knock-knock jokes!
Knock-knock.
— Who's there?
Secret police.
— Secret police who?
Nawww, man. It's really just pizza delivery. We were just fuckin' with you a little bit. But we got your pizza here. The pie's getting cold. So open up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
Also, for some reason, you should be all fire and brimstone, saying only what I want you to say. It doesn't matter that your current writing style is able to pull plenty of traffic, you should bend over backwards and alter it to suit me and me alone!
____________________________________________________________
Techdirt. Where trolls constantly display their cluelessness.
08:01:12[i-143-5]
P.S. Anyone know what the hell the numbers above actually do yet? I know I don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
It's a secret NSA tracking number.
Anyone that looks at it is infected with a brain virus that lets the NSA have realtime access to their thoughts.
There's not cure and the only way to block it is to wear a hat made out of tinfoil.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
P.S. Anyone know what the hell the numbers above actually do yet? I know I don't.
Speaking for the first group only (08:01:12), they are the mean/min/max mental age being displayed by the retarded OOTB, based on some mathematical calculation run against its post.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
In our case it's intelligent writing, Cathy. In yours, it appears to be "unrequited love" (*salacious wink*). Get a vibrator and GTFO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
he just wants attention
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It'd be fascinating to see you actually refute it!
The day you make a cogent, relevant point, I'm going out and buying powerball tickets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The bigger lie is that it's even possible
Can't. Be. Done.
No amount of money, no amount of spying, no amount of data collection and analysis, no amount of extra-Constitutional overreach can prevent it.
Either these guys know this or they don't.
If they know it, and I suspect they do, then they're just using this as the stalking horse for doing whatever-the-hell they want to do.
If they don't know it, then they're massively incompetent and should be immediately replaced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you know what the bad thing is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: you know what the bad thing is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: you know what the bad thing is?
Btw: do you remember mr Atta? They say he flew into one the WTC Towers. The towers went down due to extreme heat and impact: concrete was pulverized, metal was molten, everything went into dust and ash (despite the fact that the kerosine was largely burned outside the building within a few minutes as you can see on all the footage), and also the plain was completely vanished. They couldn't even find any hard evidence anymore to determine which plan it actually was. The impact was so big that the lower 80 stores, which were completely in tact, all collapsed almost in free fall, as if now construction was in between to resist. They fel symetrically into their own footprint. BUT NOW THE GOOD NEWS: in this gigantic pile of glowing, burning, boiling dust and molten metal they found the paper passport of Mr. Atta! Amazing achievement, don't you think? There were also more than 500 first responders who heared large and many explosions in basements, starecases, all over the place. But NIST and the 9/11 Commission found those not relevant. Why would they: they had the passport of Mr Atta, so the problem was solved. Hahah, big joke! Unbelievable that citizens and lawmakers of the US (and the rest of the world!) are taking this crap. We need a REAL investigation - ae911truth -
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: you know what the bad thing is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Security Agencies:
Sincerely,
Joe Q. Public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Have another report vote for that ootb.
So when are you gonna follow your own advice and not do so? I promise we won't miss you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having to have talking points rather than actually discussing the issues is what has led us to this point where no one trusts nor believes the NSA, the politicians over this matter, nor the administration.
Had they just came out and owned up to it rather than trying misdirection they would have gained by the public allowing the benefit of the doubt. It's worked for years that the public has done so without the proof.
Now it comes down to points like Obama saying he didn't know about the spying on the global leaders of other nations and somehow most don't believe him as the government has lost it's creditability.
The NSA faces the same problem with all it's apologizers trying to get into the action of making themselves look bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Highly amused...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pre-9/11 coverage
It was 1980 when I first heard about the plan to let Poppy use Supreme Court appointments to ensure a Bush dynasty. The person who told me approved, because, she felt, Congress wants to please voters and can't be relied on to do the "unpopular things" necessary to keep the US standard of living higher than the rest. With a CIA family in power, spy agencies could get the party started quickly and hand Congress the bill, precluding debate.
After watching that plan for a daylight coup develop for two decades, I read the list of 9/11 targets in the NYT. The prosecution team who put Yousef away spoke off the record, saying they suspected that his friends were already living and training on secure US military bases.
By 1999 I was able to determine, by logic and strategy, when the attacks would have to happen in order to divert attention from the final public vote count.
I am neither smarter nor better informed than our intelligence, law enforcement, and military agencies. They read the Times, too.
FBI fought NSA for access to KSM's phone calls for years. Finally they built their own platform in the ocean to listen for themselves.
Thus both agencies knew everything I knew and more. That's why, in 1999, I realized that if 9/11 were an inside job, that enabled anyone to figure out when it would happen. Were it a sneak attack by foreigners only, that would not have been possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
The 3rd building (WTC7) wasn't even hit by a plane.
This issue needs to be cleaned up. ALL US CITIZENS MUST DEMAND FOR A NEW INVESTIGATION. I have the feeling that Snowden is going to come up with some evidence....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nsa
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nsa
[ link to this | view in chronology ]