Keith Alexander, On Stage While Story Of NSA Infiltrations Breaks, Tries To Mislead With Response
from the servers-or-datacenter dept
In an interesting bit of timing, just as the Washington Post was breaking the news that the NSA had infiltrated Google and Yahoo's cloud data by hacking into the (stupidly) unencrypted data links between data centers, it turned out that NSA boss Keith Alexander was on stage at a Bloomberg Government Cybersecurity conference. He was asked about the report, and he tried to tap dance around it by claiming the NSA doesn't have access to Yahoo and Google's servers. The Guardian has a brief summary:Alexander, asked about the Post report, denied it. “Not to my knowledge, that’s never happened,” the NSA director said, before reiterating an earlier denial Prism gave the NSA direct access to the servers of its internet service provider partners.But, of course, in typical Alexander fashion, he's choosing his words carefully -- and thankfully people can more easily see through it at this point, since they're getting so used to it. The report didn't say they were accessing those companies' servers or databases, but rather hacking into the network connection between their data centers. That's like a report breaking of the NSA hijacking armored cars with cash, and Alexander claiming "we didn't break into the bank." Nice try.
“Everything we do with those companies that work with us, they are compelled to work with us,” Alexander said. “These are specific requirements that come from a court order. This is not the NSA breaking into any databases. It would be illegal for us to do that. So I don’t know what the report is, but I can tell you factually: we do not have access to Google servers, Yahoo servers, dot-dot-dot. We go through a court order.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: datacenters, infiltration, keith alexander, network, nsa, nsa surveillance
Companies: google, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well...
Why not, he clearly has one with the Constitution printed on it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The appropriate response to any intelligence official's answer ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Armored cars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blurring the original story. The WashPost story still says:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-internet -companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
"claimi ng the NSA doesn't have access to Yahoo and Google's servers." -- Actually, that's what Google and Yahoo claim. -- PFFFT! Just self-serving LIES.
I'd say this new bit is mix of distancing the corporate co-conspirators and confusing all with random who said what when.
But in any case, it's just another TRIVIAL bit of fluff. Where is Mike calling for indictments?
Google defenders are much like NSA defenders: basically blind to privacy, just insist over objections to being spied on: "we're only helping and you should be grateful!".
09:52:38[k-705-2]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blurring the original story. The WashPost story still says:
Can someone tell me why I'm so afraid of Google spying on me? I wake up in a cold sweat every night, my dreams haunted by a six letter multi-colored word. There is no way to be free of the...in fact I can't even THINK the word now, the colly-wobbles it gives me are that bad. After all, the...G...thing IS the Internet, it's the tubes that tie everything together.
____________________________________________________________
Techdirt, the place that has quite a few anti-Google articles but is still somehow pro-Google.
09:55:56[ば-391-か]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Blurring the original story. The WashPost story still says:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Living in a Society of Fear
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You ask if something happens, the answer is 'not under this program'. However you don't get to ask the next lead in question such as 'under what program does it happen'. So we've gone from 20 questions to one.
I am yet to hear honest answers to honest questions and that is why the NSA has to be reigned in. There is no meaningful oversight, no meaningful abeyance to the Constitution, and no one is holding them in check from doing what ever it is they have a mind to do.
It is time to gut this agency. It is time to establish new guidelines and new leadership through out it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spying on Google & Yahoo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Muscular/Incensor has significantly enhanced the amount of benefit that the NSA derives from our special source access," one 2010 GCHQ document notes.
It adds that this highlights "the unique contribution we are now making to NSA, providing insights into some of their highest priority targets."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITS CALLED A NETWORK SNIFFER
AND THE ONES I HAVE WOULD MAKE YOU THINK THE NSA JUST STOLE OUR SHIT
-some hacker guy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A double negative ≈ a positive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they ever do another remake of 1984, I want Alexander in it as O'Brien!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
impeach Obama now!
Impeach!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]