NSA Insists It Needs All The Metadata, While Eric Holder Says He Was 'Concerned' About It Even Before Snowden
from the yeah,-right dept
Earlier this week, as we've noted, the leaders of the Intelligence Community fought hard for their metadata, arguing that they were "necessary" and under no circumstances would they give up their precious metadata. They even made nonsensical arguments, including suggesting that if the NSA doesn't get to keep the metadata it's actually worse for Americans' privacy. And of course, it seems a bit bizarre that the NSA is so focused on this when it's pretty clear that the program hasn't been particularly useful in stopping terrorism.Of course, a day later, after these representatives from the Intelligence Community made it abundantly clear that they had no interest, whatsoever, in giving up their metadata, Attorney General Eric Holder suddenly announced that the administration has been concerned about the metadata collections since before the Snowden leaks, and that the administration wants to "work with Congress" as Congress considers legislation to stop bulk metadata collection.
Of course, the idea that anyone in the administration was legitimately concerned about the bulk metadata collection is pretty laughable given everything they've done to defend it, including having the representatives from the intelligence community go to the PCLOB on Monday suggesting that all hell would break loose without their precious, precious metadata. It seems that Holder's statement is much more about the administration seeing the writing on the wall with the USA Freedom Act, and realizing that it now wants to pretend that it's been thinking about cutting back on the bulk metadata collection all along.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eric holder, metadata, nsa, nsa surveillance, pclob, section 215
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Too much "of course". Avoid meaningless conjunctives.
Anyhoo, why is it necessary to tell us Holder is lying? Is he still breathing? Then he's lying. -- Or to imply that NSA is under pressure when it's not? -- And when did this turn into sheerly political blog? Where's the tech? -- And why no mention of Google's party barges? That's gotta be the biggest innovation of the year, something no one else has ever done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too much "of course". Avoid meaningless conjunctives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too much "of course". Avoid meaningless conjunctives.
Is it just me or does it seem like Blue offering writing critiques is kind of like a priest offering sex counseling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Too much "of course". Avoid meaningless conjunctives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too much "of course". Avoid meaningless conjunctives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nip it in the bud, call it a day
I say fuck 'em - they had their chance years ago to fix this mess, and they decided keeping it a secret was a better solution.
I hope Congress fucks them over good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nip it in the bud, call it a day
And after that, we need to fuck Congress over good -- it's at least as responsible for this as anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forget terrists, think of the children!
But think of the children!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Forget terrists, think of the children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Forget terrists, think of the children!
I bet they do.
I wonder if that's the leverage they have over some of the apparatchiks defending spying on their own people for the NSA.
It's probably easy, target visits a porn site (99% of men do), swap a few pictures with a MITM attack, confront the minister or senior civil servant with the logs.
They have all the mechanisms in place, it must be quite easy to gain leverage over allied politicians, ministers etc. that way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Forget terrists, think of the children!
CIA wants to turn you into an apparatchik, so they do their 'redirect' attack, the one they use to MITM Google in one of the leaks. CIA redirects them to a kiddy porn server in Orlando, now the logs of both GCHQ and NSA show them visiting a kiddy diddling site.
CIA man visits minister and explains the shock and outrage at finding this, but assures minister that he's a good man and therefore the CIA won't tell.
Minister can't go to MI5 because Parker could be a CIA apparatchik (he is doing an attack on the free press FFS). Indeed he can't get help at all, because all it takes is ONE apparatchik among the people in the know and he is gone.
It may sound fanciful, but the mechanisms are already in place. Also read a few leaks. The plan to attack Greenwald & Wikileaks.
http://www.thetechherald.com/articles/Data-intelligence-firms-proposed-a-systematic-attack -against-WikiLeaks/12751/
The leverage they got over a Swiss Banker:
http://www.businessinsider.com/edward-snowden-describes-cia-tricks-2013-6
The weird way ministers are behaving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metadata is the key to their haystack
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+vicepresident+Gore+predicts+lawmakers+will+rein/9129866/stor y.html#ixzz2jtM4w5ej
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HTTPS on France, Spain Germany
Then we had leaks claiming the spying agencies of those countries assisted in that spying.
Then we had leaks showing USA told GCHQ it could break HTTPS encrypted traffic. i.e. Industrial, government, medical, political and lots of other sensitive data on these countries.
So I just realized, that the French, German, Italians etc. were not in among the leaks.
Hypothesis:
The spy agencies of allies agreed to tap data that contains mostly their own countries comms, on the basis that only unencrypted traffic could be viewed by the NSA.
So when the spy agencies were busy spying on their own countries, did they know about the 2010 breakthrough in encryption cracking the NSA had done?
Were they assured by the NSA only unencrypted traffic could be read?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA MANDATE?
"Breaking the law" can always be remedied by lawyers
has always been their thinking.
So continue to be "shocked and appalled" and vice versa.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fuck You, Eric Holder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fuck You, Eric Holder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know what concerns me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know what concerns me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eric Holder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its about the numbers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]