French Court Orders Google To Magically Make Max Mosley Orgy Pictures Disappear
from the good-luck-with-that dept
Earlier this year, we wrote about a troubling set of cases in Europe filed by Max Mosley, the former head of the motorsports organization FIA. As you may recall, a few years back, Rupert Murdoch's News of the World newspaper published some photos of Mosley's "rendezvous with five sex workers," who were dressed as prison guards, while he was dressed as a prisoner. NotW described the photos as a "Nazi orgy," which Mosley was extra-sensitive to, given that his father, Oswald Mosley, had been the head of the UK Fascist party, and a friend of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels (who both attended Oswald's wedding to Max's mother). Mosley sued on a variety of claims and won narrowly over the "Nazi" claim. Basically, while the images are apparently accurate, they were supposed to represent a generic German prison, rather than a Nazi prison. The court also ruled that the release of the pictures violated his privacy.Since then, Mosley has been on a campaign of censorship. He went to court trying to argue that newspapers should need to alert famous people before publishing anything about them, giving them a chance to try to block such stories. Thankfully, that failed. He also sought to influence the UK review of journalism (in the wake of that other, more well-known News of the World scandal, involving hacking into voicemails).
He's also been suing Google in various European countries, arguing that they need to somehow magically block out any instance of the photos of that orgy. Yes, Mosley thinks it's all Google's fault that these images still exist. He argues that:
if somebody were to stop the search engines producing the material, the actual sites don't really matter because without a search engine, nobody will find it, it would be just a few friends of the person who posts it. The really dangerous thing are the search engines.Of course, it's not the search engines "producing the material." It's the search engines finding the content that others have posted. Unfortunately, a French court has sided with Mosley and ordered Google to magically try to make those images disappear from the internet. This is both close to impossible technically, but also a restriction that will have significant unintended consequences. It will almost certainly block out legitimate content, including news coverage related to this story. For example, much of the news coverage of the lawsuits have included the images. Take, for example, this Gawker story. Under the ruling in France, Google will now be forced to figure out how to censor links to such legitimate journalistic stories.
Yes, it's perfectly reasonable for Mosley to be upset about how all of this went down. And he appears to have received a large sum of money from News of the World about this. But going on this crusade won't stop the pictures from appearing on the internet (in fact, each time there's news about this, it only calls more attention to it), and worse, it will inevitably lead to false positives that censor legitimate content.
Google has already announced its intent to appeal, noting that it's wrong to hold a search engine responsible for policing the work of others. While the release of the original images may be illegal, blaming Google for the fact that such images can be found is supremely misguided.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: france, max mosley, orgy, search engines
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why blame Google?
Surely they can all find it as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why blame Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Why blame Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why blame Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why blame Google?
"What a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack." Or should that be "What a strange, strange world we live in, Mistress Jacqueline?" Is Mosley really so stupid that he doesn't yet know that the Internet was made for porn?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oooh, which is worse: Nazi motorsports head or Google?
So congratulations, Mike! You've found the point where Google can get my (reluctant) sympathy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oooh, which is worse: Nazi motorsports head or Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oooh, which is worse: Nazi motorsports head or Google?
I want to know so that I don't end up buying it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The issue of it being a Nazi-themed event came up because one of the newspaper's arguments was that it was in the public interest that an important public figure, with connections to the Nazis, was appearing to celebrate that and mock victims of the Holocaust. But the Court looked into this and found that they were speaking German because one of the women involved wanted that, and Mosley was fine with it due to speaking German. The Court also noted "Russian might have also been suitable, but unfortunately none of the participants spoke Russian."
While I'm fine with the original ruling, he does seem to be getting rather ridiculous in his quest for vengeance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have a problem with the court deciding what is a newspaper's business and what is not. If, as it sounds, the newspaper broke the law by trespassing, then Mosley should sue over that, maybe even press charges. But censoring the pictures themselves seems way over the line to me.
I'm not. But then, I don't live there and so I don't have to be. Just so long as Google doesn't censor this stuff anywhere outside of the jurisdiction of the court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So he sued them for misuse of private information. Privacy does seem to be a more European concept than American, but the basic principles are that if someone has a legitimate expectation of privacy about something, it is illegal to breach that privacy (say, by publishing photographs) unless the breach is in the public interest.
By me being fine with the original ruling, that was the original English High Court ruling (and, for that matter, the ruling of the ECtHR in the case). I would suggest that the French ruling wouldn't hold in the UK due to it being relatively futile.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In the US, if you've put conditions on someone being on your property (for instance, no photography) and someone violates those conditions, a trespassing case can be made.
I don't think that's quite right. I think the main difference is that in the US the right to free speech is weighted more heavily than privacy.
Privacy is still very important, but when the two collide, free speech generally wins. For the government to tell citizens that they cannot say something is a violent act that is restricted by the Constitution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I don't have a problem with the original privacy ruling and fine, but there is no way the photos of Mosley are ever going to be buried. Any court-sanctioned attempt to do so can only make things worse for everybody.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uP_4MSQMs8Y/TaOfFgk0SXI/AAAAAAAAA3o/bDrPcAvCazg/s400/Max_Mosley_Nazi _gangbang4.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yes that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We need to fork the web so that the oldies can feel OK with their fucked up search engines but we can still have free reign.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Mosley Effect?
>it only calls more attention to it
You know, somebody should come up with a short, catchy phrase for this kind of thing. The Mosley Effect?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
French Court and Google
All Mosley has asked for and got is an order that Google stop displaying these images rather than forcing him to make a request each time they appear.
This seems to be more administrative convenience than censorship. I suggest everyone read the judgement before commenting on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: French Court and Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: French Court and Google
How does it being an administrative convenience make it any less a case of censorship?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: French Court and Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about this?
I mean sure, it might block a few other pages, but if they want Google to do the impossible, they'll just have to accept a little collateral damage along the way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What a tool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amusingly, while search engines may well have been the primary way to find information when this first happened, things have changed. People use social media to locate things they're interested in just as much as search engines nowadays. He can get Google to successfully block every instance of the photo somehow, and all his "work" can be undone in seconds by a message that's retweeted a couple of times. Bypass this, and people will just use obfuscated links or host images with the URL of the photos contained within the image rather than the HTML, or any number of other tricks to make sure people remain aware of this story. The harder he tries to suppress this story, the harder people will work to keep it alive.
Even without considering the impossibility of blocking these pictures without vast unintended consequences, merely focussing on search engines is almost quaint.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google
Step 2)Post a disclaimer on Google France listing the terms that will be eaten immediately below the search box, leading to a SERIOUS Streisand effect as people run off to Bing, Yahoo, et all to see what they might be missing via Google and making sure noone misses out.
Step 3)Grin having followed the letter of the ruling while proving its stupidity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Streisand Effect
In many ways the French court and Mr Mosely seem to misunderstand how the internet functions and the impact of certain legal decisions, when it comes to what amounts to censorship.
I am embarrassed by how backwards the French system seems to be when it comes to understanding the impact of the internet and how it functions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]