100,000 Users Of Chinese Microblog Sina Weibo Punished For Violating 'Censorship Guidelines'

from the turning-online-into-offline dept

We've written a number of times of the various ways in which China tries to police its online world. These include punishing individuals, as well as imposing general rules that apply to everybody. Until now, it's been hard to tell to what extent the latter were just saber-rattling. Now we know, thanks to a new post on the Global Voices site:

According to the Beijing District Joint Platform Against Rumor, more than 103,673 Sina Weibo users have been penalized since August 2013 for violating the Weibo "community code of practice (CoP)" and the "Seven Self-Censorship Guidelines".

An official release alleges that among the penalized Weibo users:

1,030 distributed untruthful information
75,264 published personal attack comments
14,357 harassed other users
3,773 published indecent and obscene materials
9,246 engaged in other forms of misconduct such as copying other users' content

The newly implemented community penalties range from temporary account suspension to permanent deletion of accounts.
Numbers aside, what's interesting here is that the vast majority of users were punished for "personal attack comments" -- at least that's how things are presented:
As one netizen pointed out, "this is just an excuse to silence those who are critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)". Another user pointed out that the Party-sponsored online commentators are "immune to" the community rule even when they have launched personal attack comments against political liberals. It appears that the so-called "community" rule only applies to dissenting voices.
What's clever about this is that not only are people with inconvenient views silenced, but their protests are redefined to be the far less glamorous "personal attack comments". As Global Voices concludes, the net effect of these moves is that:
dissenters have been forbidden to speak out online and ordinary netizens are slowly being disciplined into behaving as passive consumers of online information through the imposition of "community code of practice."
In other words, the online world is slowly becoming like the offline one. Does that mean the Internet in China is on its way to being tamed? It seems unlikely, but only time will tell.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, china, microblog, weibo


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    S. T. Stone, 19 Nov 2013 @ 12:13am

    Something tells me you won�t hear about this over on Bloomberg News.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 19 Nov 2013 @ 1:11am

    dissenters have been forbidden to speak out online and ordinary netizens are slowly being disciplined into behaving as passive consumers of online information through the imposition of "community code of practice."
    The dream and aim of the **AA and **A parts of western governments too...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2013 @ 6:04am

      Re:

      Not only **AA and **A. Preventing opposition is politically a dreamworld for leaders since it would make their jobs so much easier.

      Also, anyone law enforcement/military-related would be thrilled on a professional level. It would make their jobs infinitely easier. Not to mention the relief on the lobbying companies, since it would be all about buying votes and nothing about defending the reasoning behind it!

      Many people benifit from censorship. There is a reason it is so popular...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2013 @ 1:16am

    The more they try to tame the Internet, the more likely the people will lose it, for they will eventually have nothing left to lose.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2013 @ 1:39am

    an d this attitude is spreading to so called democratic countries, the USA and UK being but two!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2013 @ 3:02am

    China just hates it when due process is enforced.

    No wonder Chris Dodd and out_of_the_blue like it there.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2013 @ 5:07am

    Sounds like a sociopath's wet dream

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.