MPAA 'Settles' Another 'Victory' Against Hotfile For $80 Million That No Artists Will Ever See
from the chalk-another-one-up dept
Following about a month and a half after the MPAA got IsoHunt to "settle" for $110 million (and to shut down), the anti-innovation lobbyists can now cheer about getting a similar "settlement" out of Hotfile, this time for $80 million which will never be paid (and certainly, no actual artists will see any of it). Hotfile had already lost the key ruling in court, which will now effectively place massive liability on any digital storage locker online. The MPAA will put out its press releases and bogus statements about how this will show other sites that they can't "get away with" enabling infringement, even as a dozen similar sites will pop up overseas where they'll be even less concerned with what the MPAA has to say. There seems to be no point in this, other than the MPAA shutting down the kind of innovations that consumers clearly have shown that they want. It makes no sense. The MPAA thinks that this will scare off other similar sites, but in their decades of "fighting piracy," that has never happened. Each one of these victories leads to... more such sites appearing, though in ways that are harder to shut down, less respect for the legacy Hollywood studios, and a general feeling that Hollywood refuses to adapt and compete. It's a braindead strategy that never made sense. I don't see how it's a victory for anyone. It won't decrease the amount of infringement. It won't stop cyberlockers. It won't help consumers. It won't help movie makers. It won't do anything, other than letting the MPAA declare victory.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cloud computing, cyberlocker, storage
Companies: hotfile, mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sounds familiar
It keeps happening!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This isn't going to get me going back to movie theaters
If these Hollywood dinosaurs don't get the hint that releasing good movies, understanding supply and demand, and not acting like fascists would help them earn more sales and cut costs, then they deserve to go extinct.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Summary judgment was rendered against Hotfile because of its specific activities, as articulated in great detail by the trial court. To say that this decision effectively places massive liability on an online digital storage locker is to totally misread the facts as presented in the case. Do what Hotfile did and you will almost certainly lose before a court. Play by rules long ago established by law and it is almost certain that your digital storage locker business will thrive and grow if you offer your customers excellent and reasonably priced service.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
About as much as the police scare a drug dealer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For myself, I quit music when sue'em started. I have not bought one single album nor song since then. When the MPAA followed suit I stopped buying movies. I want not one single dime of my money to go to supporting this sort of behavior.
They may have won the case but I promise you they have lost me as a customer. It will never drag me back in the store to buy one of their products. Nor will this drag me back into the deplorable viewing conditions of a theater.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tell that to mega upload
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Observe, for example, Steam's stance on piracy. By providing convenient service at an attractive price point, they've thrived in the PC gaming market.
Compare and contrast the movie and music industries, which still haven't moved past last century's distribution methods (movie theaters, radio), and actively fight against modern distribution (Netflix, YouTube).
The **AAs are rent-seeking organizations that actively weaken their "protected" industries to preserve their own power, lining their own pockets at everyone else's expense. "Fighting piracy" is simply the excuse they've chosen to use to justify their actions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And thats all they need to get their big paycheck. They dont care about movies or pirates. The only thing they want is money.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
- Driving businesses to foreign countries. Check!
- Losing more respect from the people even though they already have none. Check!
- Keep blabbing about "stealing" and "theft" while blatantly stealing from the artists. Check!
- Living in a delusional world where they think people will give a shit to their pseudo victories. Check!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If you go through the info posted on the PACER system of US Courts, you will find out that Hotfile lost on summary judgement because the DMCA safe harbour did not apply to them.
It didn't apply because:
1. they did not implement a repeat infringer policy
2. they did not register a Designated Agent with the Copyright Office.
Hotfile only implemented 1.+2. after the lawsuit started. Had they done so, the DMCA would have protected the company from (at least) summary judgement.
The MPAA had a clear and easy victory here because Hotfile simply did not bother to respect the provisions of the law.
Had Hotfile been an honest company (and taken care to respect the simple provisions of the DMCA), they would have most likely prevailed in court. BUT:
Another issue debated in the case was the Red Flag knowledge condition for applying the safe harbor. The discovery process revealed emails and internal Hotfile messages - that the judge mentioned - raise sufficient doubts to warrant a decision in a trial. (made up example: " a user writes to Hotfile support - I'm having trouble downloading this copy of Seinfeld. Please help out. I downloaded the other 10 episodes here and here from Hotfile with success")
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
'�This judgment by the court is another important step toward protecting an Internet that works for everyone,�'
if the important thing was protecting the internet in the first place and ensuring it worked for everyone, how come all that happens is the industries just then sit back, count the extra money (money they would NOT have had), not give anything extra to the artists that these law suits are supposed to be about, but still not put up a service that is a patch on what these 'alternative sites' offer. if they were truly interested in doing that, that would be the first step. they are not in the least interested in doing any such thing! taking sites and people to court is all they are after. that and the gradual chipping away to get strong laws in place that will eventually fuck the 'net up completely by having total control of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And not a single buck was given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
half awake
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Because they are doing it for the artists.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You said there was no money in copyright infringement, Masnick.
LOL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: tell that to mega upload
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
You guys are determined to exemplify the concepts of Darwin.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: And not a single buck was given
That money means more to spend on cutting edge art rather than the easy stuff they know will sell.
Sorry.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And not a single buck was given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
How many luxury cars did Kim Dotcom have again?
No money in infringement, right Masnick?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And not a single buck was given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/industry_news/limewire_sued_for_more_money_than_exists_in_th e_world.html
"The RIAA told a court that it identified over 11,000 American songs that were being illegally shared, and that it should be compensated for every individual download of the tracks. However, its claim for $72 trillion is 20 percent higher than the combined wealth of the entire world, which is $60 trillion according to the NME."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
DMCAed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
After the MPAA admitted in the trial that they believed 5 million was enough to bankrupt Gary Fung. I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that there was any "money" when even the MPAA knew that there wasn't anywhere the amount they were asking for.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And not a single buck was given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MPAA wins, Mike whines. Nothing new here.
2nd: HOTFILE NEVER PAID THE CREATORS A CENT. Mike always forgets that tiny little point.
3rd: consumers don't have ANY right to get content how they want, when they want. They've NO rights whatsoever until and unless pay! Mike just goes with his usual assertion that "consumers clearly have shown that they want" which is FREE as in STOLEN, is some primary right. Well, it ain't kids. If you don't want to pay and the content isn't made available by its owners, then you'll have to go without our empty entertainment, so boo hoo.
Note also how short this piece is compared to the big deal Mike I think last week over MPAA not being able to use "pirate" and other terms. -- MPAA WILL CALL HOTFILE PIRATES ALL THEY WANT NOW! HOTFILE ADMITTED THE FACTS!
Where Mike "supports copyright" -- except when he supports piracy.
02:31:52[c-962-7] [ This suppresses the kids from fraud of using my screen name. ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright Lobbys Working Hard
Its like they don't realize that the internet is GLOBAL. They can pay for laws here in the US and in a few European countries, but there are a lot more on the internet than just those few.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MPAA wins, Mike whines. Nothing new here.
*Insert usual straw man arguments*
*Insert usual ad hominem attack*
Take a loopy of techdirt
Gee OOTB,I know you like the back of my hand. You better get a new routine but I doubt that will work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Have a DMCA vote.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Keep in mind the 'case' against MU somehow required them to break numerous laws to go after Dotcom and gather evidence(which they then tried to wipe clean), and keeps being pushed back due to the *AA's lapdogs in the DoJ realizing they have no real evidence, so as far as showing he made his money off copyright infringement(instead of, you know, providing an extremely popular service that a lot of people used), they can't, and haven't, proved a thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah. Free skat.
"I can give you a convoluted legal argument supporting my claim that, because the current law is flawed, I am completely justified in pretending that I'm not simply a thief."
"I am blameless. Stop offending me. And you need to resume giving me all of your music for free. It's my Right, plus we're actually helping the artists develop a sustainable model to replace the unfairly flawed one we trashed."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's isn't that people want free stuff, but rather they want reasonably priced stuff, stuff that doesn't have a whole ton of utterly anti-consumer 'strings'(DRM, region locking, release windows, Schrodinger's license 'it's a license when it comes to what the customer can do with it, but a sale when it comes to paying the creator', and of course the classic 'X is not legally available to purchase/listen/watch in your area, because screw you') attached.
As evidence of such, look up what happens to piracy rates when a service like Netflix enters an area: the availability of infringing materials remains the same both before and after, yet piracy rates plummet, so despite the fact that people in those areas can still get the movies and shows available for free, this shows that a large number of them have no problem paying for a reasonably priced service that offers what they want, if it's made available to them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I paid for Megaupload and wished that the MPAA had actually talked to Kim and struck a deal like he offered.
I pay for Netflix and still wish that the MPAA would stop trying to strangle it.
I don't pay for HBO to watch game of thrones because HBO won't sell it where I live. Who is to blame for that? If only someone had shown them years ago how to distribute content...
The demand for content is there, the legacy players have found it's ore profitable to levy pirate taxes on blank media and sue their fans than to sell direct so fuck 'em it's what they want.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MPAA wins, Mike whines. Nothing new here.
I guess *our* vacation, where we had reasonable, adult discussions taking place, is over. OOTB is back.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sell or Sue?
It's really a "no brainer" and explains why the current system is so messed up, those in charge of it have no intention of taking a 150000% loss on each "potential" transaction by actually providing legal methods to obtain their product.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So called "intellectual property"/monopoly law infringes on every individual's ability to use their own physical property, and does so via State force/aggression/violence (or threat thereof).
As I prefer consensual relationships and voluntary exchange, I say abolish all State enforced copyright/patent/trademark law. Allow free individual human beings to engage in "copyright-like" contract if they deem it necessary, but please, stop advocating for ever more State force/aggression/violence in our lives.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And not a single buck was given
No, the **AAs have already said that any money gained threw lawsuits will be put back into their legal departments for more lawsuits. Not a damn cent would ever go to the artists.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sounds familiar
"IT KEEPS HAPPENING!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MPAA wins, Mike whines. Nothing new here.
No it doesn't. Not at all. Anyone can sign their comments here as out_of_the_blue and I control the actual such named account. Also, it isn't fraud. Your online handle is NOT a legal identity. It is not equal to the name that appears on your driver's licence or passport.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Crikey, I'm sure glad that generations of Jewish people, African Americans, folks of Italian descent and so forth just up and left the USA because The Law discriminated against them. That sure would make for a Better Country. Also, I'm pretty glad that the Gay people in the USA just left for someplace else because they were legally discriminated against. Oh, yeah, and the dopers in Washington and Colorado that left for Jamaica.
You dumbass, all of morality is not contained in the law. Peddle that balloon juice elsewhere, we've full up here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Any location other than those where the United States claims jurisdiction over foreign defendants, like the US did with Hotfile in Panama.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I will support and buy nw stuff from NON-MAFIAA Sources.
I will never go to a Theater, pay for Cable, see a Concert of some lame sold out MAFIAA Artist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I am the last person that would ever try to defend the actions of the MAFIAA, but Hotfile kind of shot themselves in the foot. I agree with the AC above that any cyberlocker that is setup properly should not have any issue because of this ruling in the scope that it is presented in. What worries me is that the MAFIAA will try to twist this ruling to expand it to cover other sites that do not meet the same criteria that was used against Hotfile.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: MPAA wins, Mike whines. Nothing new here.
Can't believe it took me so long to think of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: And not a single buck was given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ah... Sky clouds
Hmm... maybe when some smart person lets people op there keys to turn it into a Actual shared cloud... Oh I've got my head in the clouds now... pun intended.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
>You guys are determined to exemplify the concepts of Darwin.
You're confused -- Techdirt is neither a member of RIAA nor of MPAA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The argument that Hotfile deserves to be assumed to be up to no good because they encouraged uploads/downloads with financial incentives is deeply flawed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
It might be difficult at times sure, given the *AA's have so many branches out there it can be hard to tell what is and is not affiliated with them, but it's certainly possible to avoid intentionally spending money on what they push out, and therefor profit from, while still having plenty of entertainment options available from independent sources/creators.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]