Administration Finally Responds To A Petition... About Something A Child Said On The Jimmy Kimmel Show
from the wow-such-power-to-the-people dept
As we just noted, the administration has put a wide variety of We the People petitions on the back burner with the average wait for a response currently sitting at 298 days. This includes one of the petitions to first hit the signature threshold back in 2011. While we're still waiting for the government to address the labeling of GMO foods, the dismissal of charges against Ed Snowden and allowing Tesla to sell vehicles in all 50 states, the administration has stepped up to declare it won't be removing Jimmy Kimmel from the airwaves.Confused? Here's the petition in all of its clumsily-worded glory.
Investigate Jimmy Kimmel Kid's Table Government Shutdown Show on ABC NetworkA single quote from a single child was construed by this petitioner as being indicative of Jimmy Kimmel and ABC's inherent racist attitudes and the petition itself achieved full Godwin in less than seven sentences. It also instructed to government to trample the First Amendment by removing Kimmel's show from the air and apologize on its behalf. Lost in the shuffle is the title's request for an investigation, but apparently just killing the show without checking anything out would also be acceptable.
I was very disturbed by Jimmy Kimmel’s ‘Kids Table’ show. It was aired on ABC recently and talked about killing all the Chinese so that the states do not need to pay back their debts to China. The kids might not know anything better. However, Jimmy Kimmel and ABC’s management are adults. They had a choice not to air this racist program, which promotes racial hatred. The program is totally unacceptable and it must be cut. A sincere apology must be issued. It is extremely distasteful and this is the same rhetoric used in Nazi Germany against Jewish people. Please immediately cut the show and issue a formal apology.
The administration has responded, pointing out that both parties have already apologized and that instructing ABC to remove the show would be a gross misuse of government power. It then invites the 100,000+ troubled petitioners to contact the FCC, presumably because their use of the We the People site shows they don't mind being ignored by government agencies.
This particular petition isn't even that old. It was created on October 19 and its deadline for a response would have been a month later. Less than 90 days from creation to response. That's some sort of land speed record for the Administration of the People, whose approach to open government is long on talk and short on action. And of the limited actions, it's most famous creation is the We the People site, which serves to remind users just how ineffective it is to petition the government directly. If nothing else, lobbyists can point to the ~300-day wait time (and the often-ineffectual, long-delayed responses) as an indication of the worth of their services. Not exactly the sort of message the administration should be sending.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jimmy kimmel, petitions, responsive, transparency, we the people
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well I just had to do it
http://i.imgur.com/FXeTeka.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So yeah, it's not completely useless, it provides me with background music (albeit I admit the availability of songs is rather poorer than Spotify).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
meh..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I apologize.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, but otherwise, what would you do for topic you can handle?
Techdirt supposedly has "Insiders" who've paid for that cachet.
02:27:34[c-730-7]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We the People renamed...
You the Forgotten.
You the Neglected.
You the Irrelevant.
You the Insignificant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maths Police!
This is a misleading statement. 298 days, according to one of your previous articles, is the average response time for unanswered responses. Regardless of how dumb petitions that receive responses are (and there are plenty of dumb ones), you can't accurately say that 298 days is the average response time if you don't include any of the petitions that have actually received responses in calculating that average.
I'm sure there's a way to include petitions that have not yet received responses with those that have received responses when calculating the average (i.e., add the disclaimer "If all unanswered petitions were answered today, the average response time is x days") but you can't really claim that 298 days is the average response time if your dataset doesn't contain a single petition that has received a response...
Sorry to be so pedantic. I'm just trying to help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maths Police!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maths Police!
And also, I agree with your second point as well. Maybe some other measurement like "bills proposed as a direct response to a petition", or something along those lines would give a better idea of how effective the petition website is.
Does anyone know if any legislation been proposed as a direct result of a whitehouse.gov petition?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SPEAKING OF IGNORING OTHER MORE IMPORTANT ITEMS:
So I'll just JAM IN links to VASTLY more important:
Google's robots and creeping militarization
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/09/googles-robots-and-creeping-militarization/
Google gobbles upstart thermostat maker Nest for $3.2 BEELLION IN CASH
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/13/google_buys_smart_home_device_builder_nest_for_32_beeelion_i n_cash/
Google. We're spying right up to the creepy limit. (tm) -- And soon as you're used to it, we get creepier!
03:24:55[d-577-1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SPEAKING OF IGNORING OTHER MORE IMPORTANT ITEMS:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OOTB is the only reason I come here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignored Petitions
If this crosses the threshold and its ignored, then we will begin making tools to help with mass protest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]