Newcastle Might Win The S**** B*** Ad Championship With An Ad It Didn't Make And Can't Afford To Buy
from the game-that-must-not-be-named dept
The end of the NFL football season is upon us, which brings on a familiar competitive scene that all Americans will be watching with anticipation. Big names competing for the spotlight of glory, battling against one another in a free for all that will have commentators chirping even weeks after it's over. I'm talking, of course, about the advertising campaigns unleashed during the game that nobody is allowed to talk about, thanks to the NFL's lawyers. Hell, even some of these very commercials like to poke fun at the overbearing trademark-i-ness of the NFL's signature game.Still, as a group that's long believed in the concept that advertising is content and content is advertising, it's sometimes difficult to see the way forward when it comes to winning the advertising war for the (small-case) big game. Production budgets have to be huge just to be in the running. The competitive landscape is enormous. Even some of the spots that required the most amount of effort fall flat on their faces compared to a couple of talking frogs. So how does a relatively small company win?
Well, according to the makers of Newcastle Brown Ale, you take a page out of 80's movie history and decide that the only way to win is to not play at all. That appears to be the concept behind Newcastle's non-campaign that's all about the commercial spot they were totally going to make, but didn't want to spring for. Oh, and they make fun of the NFL's trademark nature on top of it. For instance:
An ad about an ad they didn't make but want you to test market? And it's funny? A good start, but one clever spot ain't going to do it. Good thing Newcastle decided to make a bunch of content around this idea, including celebrities talking about how awesome their voiceovers were going to be, or footage of fake market testing for an ad they never made.
Now, this would be the appropriate moment to mention that the only disclosure I have to make about the relationship between myself and Newcastle is how much I dislike their Brown Ale. Seriously, I would rather stay sober during an all-night expose on the physics behind paint peeling than drink that beer. But that's a matter of taste (on both counts) and it doesn't keep me from appreciating the concept of an engaging, lighthearted ad campaign that pokes fun at beer ads, the beer company itself, and the NFL all at once. This is how you win the advertising wars of early February. By not playing, which is actually playing, but pretending not to be...you know...playing.
Taking the benefits of this kind of light-hearted content as advertising method further, it allows Newcastle to get involved in other new media in a way that keeps things just as light and doesn't come off as annoying. For instance, they sponsored a post on Gawker Media about the non-campaign campaign, and appear to have given the writer enough latitude to attempt their own funny tie-in in the "article", going so far as to headline it: We've Disguised This Newcastle Ad As An Article To Get You To Click It.
Newcastle bought this ad to promote the S**** B*** commercial they couldn't afford to make. I know you're probably cycling through the five stages of grief since you're reading an ad and ew, gross, but maybe just stop reading and watch the videos I've embedded. After all, Newcastle didn't pay Gawker Media a fraction of the cost of a S**** B*** commercial so you could read another think piece about M*ckl*m*r*.It goes on like that and it's nice that a company appears to be having so much fun at its own expense, even going as far as to allow new media writers to mock the new media concerns about new media sponsorships (This repetitive sentence brought to you by the folks at Techdirt. Techdirt: the other white meat). As I mentioned, nobody at Newcastle bothered to pay me to write this post, though if they did, I'd totally have killed it. Like, way better than Gawker. There would have been penis jokes and riffs about brown ales mixed with the obvious toilet humor. It would have been glorious.
No, they bought this space in a shameless attempt to force their Mega Huge Football Ad — and smooth, delicious Newcastle Brown Ale — down your throats. They also "bought" me — an in-house copywriter — because actual Gawker writers can't accept money from advertisers (not that I'm personally cashing Newcastle's checks but you know, whatever). As someone being paid to write this, I have to say that it's the greatest ad ever, mostly because Newcastle asked me to use those exact words. Is it the greatest ad I've ever been paid to call the greatest ad ever? Yes.
Wait, maybe the potentiality of that post could be some kind of Techdirt ad campaign?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising as content, commercials, content as advertising, native advertising, super bowl
Companies: newcastle
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Trademark?
Let's keep going until it loses it's meaning!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Trademark?
blumpkin - getting your unit sucked while dropping a deuce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If I owned a potty company
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey, "sports" fans: be consistent, complain about fat cats there too.
NFL Commish Makes $29.5 Mil a Year– 15 Times More Than Tax Free Org Gives to Charity, More than CEOs of Ford, Heinz, FedEx
http://www.showbiz411.com/2014/01/21/nfl-commish-makes-29-5-mil-a-year-15-times-more-than-tax-f ree-org-gives-to-charity-more-than-ceos-of-ford-heinz-fedex
And don't forget that just yesterday even Mimeograph Mike mentioned that "sports" is only "cheering the lingerie".
It's not any "ism", it's The Rich. When The Rich are limited, everyone else has a chance at freedom. (192 of 192)
12:26:41[n-677-5]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hey, "sports" fans: be consistent, complain about fat cats there too.
that should be "Hey, sports "fans": be consistent..... I think!!!
but either way, yes, they should.
blocking you only gives you more power, and gets you read every time !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hey, "sports" fans: be consistent, complain about fat cats there too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NFL sux
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The NFL sux
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The NFL sux
I would love to see big-money collegiate athletics to disappear, forcing the NFL to create a professional minor league the way baseball has.
Big money college football programs are purely about exploitation. This pretend "amateurism" that forces student athletes to hide every nickel they make from the fame while bringing millions to the institution. And they're all one injury away from being tossed away like used kleenix and one concussion away from a ruined life.
I used to be a big fan of college athletics and a big booster for my alma mater, but some switch has turned in me over the past decade, and now I simply am unable to enjoy any big money college athletics any more. It actually sickens me. May this effort by the NW'ern students cause people to finally figure out what the NCAA really is, and hopefully cause that plantation to finally disappear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a Different Kind of Exploitation (to PopeRatzo, # 15).
(*) Ian Gordon, "Played," Mother Jones, March/April, 2013
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It is from the Colbert Report.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Super Bowl
And they haven't paid much in tax since the 60's. Nice free ride they got there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pork is gonna sue you blind
Techdirt: the other white meat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pork is gonna sue you blind
Techdirt: the other, other, other white meat?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pork is gonna sue you blind
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pork is gonna sue you blind
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Americans just let you Europeans call your little game "football" because we get such a big laugh every time we hear you say it. Europeans will say, "We're watching football" while on the screen there's a bunch of Madonna's backup dancers prancing around kicking a little ball back and forth while the people in the stadium tear each other apart like jackals. Just hysterical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Now, let's see you take all of that armor off and do it like a real man.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
And I think of said it here before too.
oh yeah
Here
and my best by far boput the nancy boy game is Here
o_O
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
However, if I had to choose about which is Manlier -- which is a big part of what makes the debate so hilarious -- non-US football wins hands down. It's not even close.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Video on 2013 post not viewable?
Just curious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Video on 2013 post not viewable?
I can't find out from youtube anything about the video, so it looks like it just disappeared.
I found it by searching:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2t6CVika6o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZYNuaroPRs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
S**** B***
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: S**** B***
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clicked on this headline expecting something else...
Oh well, I kind of am anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
S
U
P
E
R
B
O
W
L
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
boring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: boring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Super Bowl"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Super Bowl"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't understand. That isn't enough asterisks to be "Stupor Bowl" so it must be something else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Too-Big Game
[ link to this | view in chronology ]