BREIN Loses Again As Dutch Court Rejects Criminal Prosecution For Copyright Infringement
from the not-so-invincible dept
Once upon a time, the Dutch "anti-piracy" group BREIN seemed invincible, winning a number of copyright infringement cases. But recently, its winning streak has come to an end. Last week we reported on how BREIN's attempt to block access to The Pirate Bay had been thrown out, and now we have the following case, as reported by TorrentFreak:
A Dutch man who admitted uploading more than 5,000 e-books to The Pirate Bay has had his case dismissed on appeal. The court ruled that the man can't be prosecuted criminally as copyright infringement cases belong in a civil court. Anti-piracy group BREIN is disappointed, but still has the option to pursue the uploader in a civil action.
Even if BREIN wins that action, the appeal court's decision is a serious defeat for the organization. It means BREIN has failed in its attempt to extend the use of criminal courts to cases that do not involve a criminal organization and where the infringements are not carried out as business activities. Had BREIN been successful, that widening of scope would have had a major impact on the Dutch copyright enforcement landscape.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright infringement, criminal, netherlands
Companies: brein
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So, status quo ante for US and I suppose UK courts.
Mega-grifter Kim Dotcom got millions by hosting infringed content. That's not even capitalism, that's THEFT. (78 of 195)
10:17:56[l-290-2]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, status quo ante for US and I suppose UK courts.
You should know, given how much money you probably get for shilling in favor of the copyright industry. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, status quo ante for US and I suppose UK courts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, status quo ante for US and I suppose UK courts.
That's false on so many levels. First the ad revenue of pirate sites has been proven to be incredibly low simply because they get the worst of the worst of the ad services (ie: nobody wants to do business with them) and while we don't know for sure what happens with TPB my experience with 100% of the trackers I go to is they are supported by donations from the community that forms around the sharing platform which is supported by articles here and research all around. Last but not least, even if they do get sweet money they DESERVE it simply because they are providing a SERVICE I want.
as also Kim Dotcom of Megaupload
He made money from offering a storage service that could be shared. And most of the files were found to never have been downloaded as the bogus process against MU developed meaning the service was mostly used for STORING files. Sue Amazon, Google, Microsoft, quick!
Commercial scale infringement is definitely where to draw the line // Mega-grifter Kim Dotcom got millions by hosting infringed content.
Again, there's no commercial activity. The sharing sites offer a service of communication and indexing, the community shares content using their own connections and resources.
it'd be enough to hamper you pirates from "over-sharing" with millions of your pals.
So far the only thing that managed to reduce file sharing was (GASP!) offering the content for fair prices and ease of access (see Netflix, Spotify etc). Not even extremely draconian measures succeeded. Because people will not respect unjust laws. And it's amusing, the most "pals" I ever shared with were about 120 thousand (the largest swarm I've ever been part) and I uploaded only to the ratio of 0.7 at the time. Which means I didn't even share a complete copy. Go educate yourself, all it takes is a 1.0 ratio to keep the thing running. Most people don't go too far past this. Nobody shares with millions. It's just that millions share with millions.
And as always, you are an obnoxious moron.
Note: my bad for feeding the dipshit, sometimes I fail to resist ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, status quo ante for US and I suppose UK courts.
This should have paired with the other Dotcom phrase..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/sarc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vets
http://www.ibtimes.com/hyman-strachman-good-guy-pirate-92-year-old-wwii-vet-sends-bootlegged-dvds -troops-abroad-693550
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright?
Kopimi, Kopiyou, Kopiall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
these industries tried to go to far. They weren't willing to settle on a status quo that everyone could live with, leaving some grey areas alone, no, they wanted everything, but it doesn't work anymore. regardless, they will try to push further and eventually lose everything.
They are their own undoing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You are aware that the TTIP, TPP etc have absolutely no chance of passing don't you?
The world is wising up to the corruption that is propogated by the Entertainment industries.
No one respects copyright anymore due the amount of laws that have been bought and paid for.
Maximalists have made their bed, now they are crying that they have to lay in it. The courts are recognising that the system has been corrupted and are pushing back.
It won't be long before copyright is completely abolished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That cost is a corrupt government that no longer represents the people, but are representatives of corporations who are going to line their pockets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kopimi, Kopiyou, Kopiall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminal prosecution for copyright infringement
line in the future. It is too expensive for society to have these cases ending in dismissals. '
Copyright infringement is already a crime in a lot of European countries,.
But this does not make the burden of proof easier but rather more difficult.
In Denmark and Sweden the copyright holders have been far from successful in their efforts to hold people accountable for copyright infringement.
The situation is complicated by the fact that mere possession of works reproduced in violation of copyright is not in itself illegal.
In the Netherlands, acquiring copyrighted works is not illegal but expressly covered by the private copying levy.
And in a criminal case, you always have to prove who did the act.
An IP address is never sufficient proof for a criminal conviction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laws, Bribery and Law-Makers - Words of Wisdom
You shall not shift judgment; you shall not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift does blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.
A wicked man takes a gift out of the bosom to pervert the ways of judgment.
A king, by justice, shall establish a land,—but, a man open to bribes, bringeth it to ruin.
Your princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loves gifts, and follows after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither does the cause of the widow come unto them.
These are old words that the leaders and rulers of today should take heed of, but they being who they be, won't see anything but the bribes laid before them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]