UK Government Official Gets Twitter Parody Account Closed Down For Mocking Politicians And Heads Of Large Companies
from the makes-you-gag dept
A couple of weeks ago, the UK passed what has become known as the "gagging bill", because it puts major restrictions on how much charities and activist groups can spend while campaigning on political issues before an election. But that wasn't the only thing the UK government was up to on the gagging front, as Tom Pride explains in a blog post:
as if to celebrate the occasion, a Twitter parody account that was critical of coalition policies was closed down after complaints were made from government officials.
The parody account was called @UKJCP, and it was a spoof of the UK's Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), which had sent the following demand via Twitter to the parody account before it was closed down:
Can you stop RT tweets we have not written -- it is not satire and is confusing to customers. It also exceeds your twitter agreement.
As Pride points out:
So now we've not just got government departments deciding what forms of public criticism are acceptable, but also deciding for us what exactly is humorous and what isn't.
Since the parody account was shut down by a UK government department, it was possible to put in a freedom of information request for the exact details of the takedown demand. Here's the key part (pdf):
The @UKJCP account has been set up with deliberate and malicious intent to devalue and criticise the work of Jobcentre Plus [the JCP in @UKJCP]. In addition, there are a number of rude and potentially libelous tweets aimed at UK government, elected politicians and the heads of large private sector organisations who are committed to working with government on reducing unemployment.
The story has a happy ending because the parody account has now been re-instated. But as Pride comments:
Apart from the obvious concern that UK government officials are openly trying to close down criticism of government, politicians and business leaders -- I'm also pretty shocked that Twitter agreed to the request.
At least Twitter changed its mind on this particular kind of gagging -- unlike the UK government.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, uk
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Does this bill also pose the same restrictions to corporations and other "entities"? or is this just another way of limiting the "little guy"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reckoning
If the government not longer wants to follow the rule of law, then they can't argue when we do the same.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And that, children, is why we have judges. And courts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The gagging law basically silences them and charities for the year before the election. It was sold as an anti lobbying bill but reading the text made it obvious that it was aimed at dissenters.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Easy to detect as parody
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This time
Yeah, *after* it hit the press. This time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]