New NSA Leakers Reveal NSA Switched From Spying On Merkel... To All Her Chief Advisors
from the well,-of-course dept
It's long forgotten now, but back in August, the US and Germany were said to be working on an agreement not to spy on each other's governments. As we noted at the time, such an agreement would almost certainly be meaningless. Of course, that news came out after the initial Snowden leaks, but prior to the high profile news in October that the NSA was monitoring German Chancellor Angela Merkel's calls. While President Obama (after first claiming he had no idea it was happening) promised Merkel that the NSA would stop spying on her phone calls, by January, those plans for a big "bilateral no-spy deal" were basically dead.And, indeed, over the weekend, German newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported that the NSA may have stopped bugging Merkel's phone, but instead it had started bugging the phones of basically everyone around her, including pretty much every senior government official who reported to her. The report quotes a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany" explaining what's going on:
"We have had the order not to miss out on any information now that we are no longer able to monitor the chancellor's communication directly," it quoted the NSA employee as saying.This shouldn't be that surprising. This is what the NSA is going to do, after all. But what amazes me about this story is the fact that it's already leaked out, and that despite all the talk of cracking down on future leaks out of the NSA, the NSA already has another leaker releasing information that is clearly politically sensitive. So many folks like to point to Snowden as if he's the only leaker the NSA ever had or ever will have. But it's increasingly looking like there are others within the NSA who are equally uncomfortable with what's become of the intelligence community.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: angela merkel, germany, nsa, spying
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh don't worry...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm baffled that shit didn't hit the fan when they were caught using that espionage to give American companies a competitive edge in the world (ie: commercial espionage).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While we expect them to spy on everyone else and give us advantages we never really expect them to spy on US and give OTHERS advantages.
I mean, sure, find the NSA tracks us all. Which would be fine, I guess... if they didn't have the information so poorly kept any 30 year old CONTRACTOR can just scoop up that information, hop out of the country and then announce what he did and what he ran off with.
It's like... Really? You are going to take all of our inforamtion and you have CONTRACTORS?! Guns for HIRE protect all of this sensitive information?? At this point we don't want you spying on us anymore even if we thought it was necessary because you are so flipping incompetent we wouldn't trust you with taking out the trash!
Then we find out you have been weakening... WEAKENING cryptography?! You've essentially made all of our systems EASIER to break into. These people should have been fired into the sun immediately. This is worse than weakening all locks on people's doors in the country. People can break into my personal files online and destroy my life with ease.
We expect them to spy, that's what spies do. We DON'T expect them to hire wolves to guard the sheep though. That's what idiots do and idiots don't make good spies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
No, that would NOT be fine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance is the BEST excuse
(If we repeat this often enough, we'll all start to believe...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
way more shocking than phone tapped
They don't collect data from Merkel, just the metaphorical "metadata" of her life.
I bet Merkel would rather have just her phone tapped. The NSA know stuff about her personal and professional life that she doesn't even know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, either that or start openly bugging the communications of Obama and those around him, and dare them to complain about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So they still don't have the actual right to show the door to the U.S. forces.
It's really "you have to be bullshitting me" territory here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Did you ever been in school? Any school?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: surrender conditions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: surrender conditions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: surrender conditions.
The prohibitions against Nazi stuff is not because of the US, it's because of German law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nobody should trust the US. We've demonstrated that again and again and again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds like someone's about to get fried, if the story is true. Hopefully the leaker will be alright, but he/she is definitely acting sloppy, by letting the papers identify who their employer is, and where they work.
I recommend leakers use DeadDrop/SecureDrop/StrongBox, and for God sake, don't identify yourself, who employes you, or your geographic location. Also, nobody is going to believe you unless you submit documents, photos, or video as proof of your assertions. Otherwise you're just an unverifiable anonymous source.
I would never trust a journalist to keep my identity safe. That's your responsibility. Even if a journalist wanted to keep you safe, chances are their phone location metadata will lead authorities right to the leaker, if they ever met face-to-face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]