Does The European Commission Really Think The Internet Is A 'Value Tree' That Requires A 'Transmission Belt Of Euros'?
from the forward-to-the-past dept
Currently, the European Commission is conducting a public consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules. Unusually, the deadline for this was extended from the original 5 February to 5 March so you still have time to make a submission if you wish -- it's open to everyone:
All stakeholders are welcome to contribute to this consultation. Contributions are particularly sought from consumers, users, authors, performers, publishers, producers, broadcasters, intermediaries, distributors and other service providers, Collective Management Organisations, public authorities and Member States.
Optimists might see the extra time as a sign that the Commission is genuinely interested in gathering as wide a range of public views on this subject as possible. But a post from Paul Keller raises the possibility that this is just window-dressing, and that it has already made up its mind about what it will do on copyright regardless of what the public thinks. As he explains:
In recent weeks officials at the European Commission's Internal Market and Services Directorate General (which is in charge of copyright policy) have been passing around this diagram of what they call the 'Internet Ecosystem value tree':
The Internet Ecosystem value tree implies that the primary purpose of the Internet -- like that of all distribution channels that came before it -- is to channel content from producers (the Authors/Artists/Audiovisual and Record Producers/Newspapers and Books Publishers/Broadcasters/Other Creative Industries in the schema above) to a separate group of people called Consumers. In exchange for this the Consumers will pay Distributors and Internet Platforms money for their services, which is then augmented with advertising income. Distributors and Internet Platforms use parts of their income to pay for the content.Of course, that's a frighteningly retrogressive vision of the Internet that seems to regard it as simply the latest incarnation of television. As Keller points out:
What the Commission implies here is that if this transmission belt of Euros does not work, then the entire Internet ecosystem will die off and as a result any public policy aimed at protecting the digital environment must ensure that content producers are paid.
Projects like Wikipedia, uses such as text and data mining, online access to cultural heritage and educational resources, and transformative use of the Internet do not follow the same logic as the traditional content industry value chains. Here limited user rights and long terms of protection become problematic and increased enforcement translates into chilling effects.The rest of his post makes similarly insightful points, and is well-worth reading. If the European Commission's Internal Market and Services Directorate General really is thinking of the Internet as a "value tree" that requires a "transmission belt of Euros", let's just hope someone there reads Keller's post and realizes what a terrible mistake that would be.
At the same time all of these types of uses are exactly what makes the Internet special and drives its potential to accelerate innovation and to democratize access to knowledge, tools and culture. The Internet is the first mass medium that is simultaneously enabling market driven uses, uses that are driven by public policy objectives (such as education or access to culture), and uses driven by people's desire to create, collaborate and contribute to the commons.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, european commission, european union, internet
Reader Comments
The First Word
“How phones works
This is the benefit of how phones workSpam Content Creators->AutoDialers->Telcoms->Customers
As you can tell, the sole benefit of phones, and possible mail, is the ability of companies to sell their product to customers. Some leeches also abuse this system to call their friends and families.
Some of these people who talk to friends and family a lot should have to pay more than others. Unlimited phone plans are unfair to those who rarely use them.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
'Internet = Tv' huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Internet = Tv' huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
is that the map of the USA in the background?
They even have the Florida peninsula there in the bottom-right corner.
it looks like they might think that "the internet" is USA-only... did they just use the diagram provided by a MAFIAA lobbyist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: is that the map of the USA in the background?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: is that the map of the USA in the background?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Writing to the commission
Only by receiving many letters by concerned consumers are they going to even think about putting something into copyright to allow what people on here have been asking for for many years....restrictions on the copyright industry and reigning in their attempt to control every aspect of the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Writing to the commission
These relatives do not realize that in truth the patient has already died. All the expensive machines surrounding him do, is emulating lifesigns.
All that is left to do for the bereaved is mourn - and after that adapt to the fact that he's gone...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Writing to the commission
It doesn't need to be "reigned in", it needs to be abolished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Haha - what a joke. They are so out of touch they can't even draw a proper diagram of who's gettin paid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How phones works
Spam Content Creators->AutoDialers->Telcoms->Customers
As you can tell, the sole benefit of phones, and possible mail, is the ability of companies to sell their product to customers. Some leeches also abuse this system to call their friends and families.
Some of these people who talk to friends and family a lot should have to pay more than others. Unlimited phone plans are unfair to those who rarely use them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That doesn't look right...
Hell some of the most popular sites on the internet are where the sites themselves are nothing but platforms for the consumers to post their own content and share it around(facebook, youtube, tumblr, ect, ect). Excluding any other mistakes that mistake alone is egregious enough to make this "chart" have no credibility because it shows no understanding of how the current internet world works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That doesn't look right...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
Those who cry "it's for communication" are living in denial. From all communications, only VoIP is paying for itself. Rest - _including_ email, is paid by ads revenue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
"From all communications, only VoIP is paying for itself. Rest - _including_ email, is paid by ads revenue."
Your statement here confuses me mightily. What do you mean by "paying for itself"? My email is not paid for by ad revenue at all. It is paid for by money I give to my service provider. Same with literally every other communications system I use on the internet (email is only one of those).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
I'm hw engineer, 10 yrs experience in networks, and never heard of those "other functions". Care to elaborate?
>> My email is not paid for by ad revenue at all. It is paid for by money I give to my service provider
Seriously? You're paying for email? Well, good for you, but I suspect it's you're either of:
* Using your ISP email. Not wise - what happen if you switch ISP?
* Tiny minority - paying for email service. What makes me think of you as tiny minority: huge userbase of gmail+yahoo+outlook(or whatever it's called today).
>> Same with literally every other communications
I'm confused: you're paying for Facebook too?! Twitter? Skype? Are you high?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
Sure... there's bulletin boards, chat groups, file transfers, VoIP, remote access, etc., etc., etc. The primary function of the internet is to allow people to communicate with each other. That this also allows commerce is purely a side-effect.
"I'm confused: you're paying for Facebook too?! Twitter? Skype?"
Let me unconfuse you: I don't pay for any of those services, true. Because I don't use them. There is much more to the internet than those things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
That this notion has been beaten down by commercial interests is a terrible thing, that that "value tree" chart is yet another such attack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
You seriously don't know that a vary large group of people actually pay real money for hosted E-Mail servers (and an ass load of other hosted services)? Do you even Internet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: And what exactly is wrong in presented picture?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All creators are consumers and most consumers are creators these days. The internet isn't a one-to-many system like radio and TV where the roles were clearly defined by inherent limitations.
Trying to impose the "old" broadcast norms on the internet is pretty much the definition of crazy in my opinion - that chicken has already flown the coup.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
omething (ie: campaign contributions and revolving door favors).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]