Ex-NSA Official Breezily Reveals Details Of NSA Surveillance Capabilities In Iraq
from the hey,-wait... dept
Throughout the whole Ed Snowden ordeal, defenders of the NSA and the surveillance state keep insisting that revealing even the slightest details of the NSA's capabilities help our enemies "win" because they'll learn how to avoid the surveillance. As such, they've been wringing their hands about how any revelation of what the NSA is up to will cause immense damage. Just recently, the NSA pressed hard on the Washington Post not to reveal the name of the country where the NSA is currently recording every single phone call. The Washington Post agreed to withhold this information -- a decision that some have challenged.However, barely a week later, in a glowing profile by the LA Times of now-retired NSA boss Keith Alexander, his former number two guy at the NSA, Chris Inglis, who also just retired, breezily admits to the depth of the NSA's surveillance capabilities in Iraq, information that prior to this had not been public:
In Iraq, for example, the National Security Agency went from intercepting only about half of enemy signals and taking hours to process them to being able to collect, sort and make available every Iraqi email, text message and phone-location signal in real time, said John "Chris" Inglis, who recently retired as the NSA's top civilian.The entire article is a weak (and grossly transparent) attempt to recast General Keith Alexander's legacy -- and thus it seems that Inglis, Alexander and the NSA have no problem at all revealing the details of its capabilities in Iraq when the entire purpose in doing so is an attempt to show how good Alexander was for the NSA. Rest assured, however, had the same bit of information come out from one of the reporters with access to the Snowden documents, the NSA and all its defenders would be screaming as loud as possible about how the publication of such information would cost lives and create immense damage to American interests while aiding our enemies. Yet, apparently, it's all fine and dandy to reveal such information... when it's part of the effort to canonize the NSA retired leader.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: capabilities, chris inglis, ed snowden, iraq, keith alexander, nsa, revealing classified info, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hypocrisy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typo monster or spellcheck monster bites!
I wish you would RING those NSA hands with a large hammer, thus keeping them off my data. I think you meant to write "wring" those hands, though! lol
Second sentence of post:
As such, they've been ringing their hands about how ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAtDGTyMIv4
Michael Chertoff CyberCon2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryski_gh2CM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
I mean, they've been throwing a massive tantrum over Snowden and how his actions have revealed general information regarding their actions, here's someone that's revealing much more focused information as to their actions, and not only that, actions taking place in an active combat zone, which just makes it all the worse.
Surely, if their anger over Snowden's actions are due to him 'presenting a threat to the NSA's operations, and ability to protect the country', and not just due to him exposing their illegal/quasi-legal actions to the public, surely they'll come down like a metric ton of law-books on this guy, right?
...
Yeah, didn't think so.
Sarcasm aside, I'd say in their attempt to retcon their former leader's reputation, they really screwed up here, now anytime they claim their anger over Snowden's actions are due to how those actions are causing 'threats to the lives of others', people can just turn around and point to this as proof that they couldn't care less about protecting lives, all they care about protecting is their power and reputation(which allows them to justify, and get more power).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The press has privileges. It seems to have forgotten that there are obligations that go along with those rights. And unless they are willing to keep up those obligations, their rights will be just that -- privileges that will become so narrow as to be meaningless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Governments are preprogrammed for this response. I would say that the "terrorists" are winning, not that they have won yet, thought the odds of them winning are extremely high.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]