Homeland Security Adviser Warns Parents That Their Mouthy Kids May Grow Up To Be Terrorists
from the just-when-you-thought-the-'terrorist-twos'-were-horrible-enough dept
Our nation's singular focus on terrorism has led to various branches of the government and counterterrorism pundits declaring all sorts of things to be warning signs of terrorist activity. Here's a short (but by no means all-inclusive) list of activities that are supposedly indicators of terrorism-in-progress.- Staying in a hotel and doing any number of "odd" things. Like not using the hotel's wifi, making requests in person at the front desk, not bringing enough baggage, using entrances/exits other than the one in the lobby area or turning down room service.
- Complaining about the TSA.
- Complaining about the water quality.
- Complaining.
- Contributing to Wikileaks (or even frequenting the site).
- Deploying glitter during a protest.
- Being a journalist. (UK edition)
- Encrypting your data.
- Expressing dissatisfaction with government policies.
- Having "money problems."
- Operating a food truck.
Now, here's a new one to add to the list. If Lisa Monaco (White House Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor) is to be believed, nearly every parent, especially those with stereotypical teens in the household, is harboring potential terrorists.
“Parents might see sudden personality changes in their children at home—becoming confrontational. Religious leaders might notice unexpected clashes over ideological differences. Teachers might hear a student expressing an interest in traveling to a conflict zone overseas. Or friends might notice a new interest in watching or sharing violent material.”That's right, parents. If your child seems moody, unreceptive to your religious leanings, enjoys watching violent "material" or wants to travel nearly anywhere in the world (not a whole lot left outside of the First World that can't be described as war-torn), he or she is your family's very own "insider threat."
Monaco understands this might be troubling for parents to hear, but it's all for the best. Remember, parents: only you can prevent terrorism.
“The government is rarely in position to observe these early signals, so we need to do more to help communities understand the warning signs, and then work together to intervene before an incident can occur.”The nation's counterterrorism forces are profoundly sympathetic for these terrorist-raisers. They truly wish they could be in the position to catch these early warning signs, but our short-sighted predecessors have prevented them from observing first-hand, thanks to obstacles like the Third and Fourth Amendments.
Not to worry. As Monaco points out, the nation has mobilized parents' neighbors against them, providing them with any number of see-something-say-something venues with which to turn in your confrontational, agnostic, R-rated movie-watching hellspawn -- just in case you don't love America enough to do it yourself.
Oh, and P.S.: the DHS reiterates its commitment to flooding small towns with military vehicles and weaponry.
Monaco said that in addition to citizen alertness, the Department of Homeland Security is increasing its partnerships across the country and making hundreds of millions of dollars in grant money available annually to local law enforcement to help improve anti-terrorism security at the municipal and county level.A terrorist in every household and a military assault vehicle in every unincorporated township. USA! USA! USA!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dhs, homeland security, lisa monaco, teenagers, terrorists
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
Seriously, the government flat-out admits it sees the citizens as the enemy here.
So... When's the revolution to overthrow everything?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Now if this doesn't fall into the WTF America category...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wouldn't it be much more worrying if teenagers remained compliant, as it possibly indicates that the hormones are not kicking in, and they are not growing up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real terrorists in this country are those charged with protecting it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sociopath?
Sociopaths are superficially charming and charismatic, which certainly doesn't describe all teenagers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
Sociopaths tend to be impulsive and easily agitated. They also tend to form groups and to disregard the consequences of their actions.
Does that sound more like a teenager?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
My overall impression from that section is that the distinction is, for most people, one of emphasis. The fact that it's in the etymology section rather than something like symptoms is telling, I think. But there are clearly some people who draw a real distinction between the words.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sociopath?
Sociopaths are people who have no empathy for other human beings. Most are not charming at all. Some get very skilled at faking emotional resonance -- those are the charming ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Sociopath?
It depends who you ask.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sociopath?
Reminds me of the downfall of the old news media. All of the trivially disprovable moral panics they push, rainbow part, pharm parties, and their ilk. Then they wonder why they have lost the younger demographics. They're not teenagers any more so it shouldn't matter right? The fools haven't realized that they have already committed demographic suicide. Demonizing your audience is a good way to alienate them. They have proven themselves less trustworthy than comedians as a news source.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pop tart guns
Fingers made to look like guns
My Little Pony schoolbags
Screaming 'Bang! Bang! You're dead!' using paperclips
and let's not forget a personal favorite...
The Magical Cellphone that can be used as a AK-47 assault rifle!1!!
Maybe those schools with these zero tolerance policies might have been ahead of the curve...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who's the Terrorist?
Are you a terrorist? If not, why are you terrorizing us, and what are you doing about your fellow government employed terrorists?
Sincerely,
Citizen AND People of the United States of America, and a whole bunch of the rest of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adding to the list...
Commenting on Techdirt
Raising a child/future terrorist
Having once been a teenager
Seriously, our government has gone nuts!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Adding to the list...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everything else we know aside
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uh oh
Is your 1 year old pooping in their pants all the time? Terrorist.
Is your 2 year old out of control? Terrorist.
Is your 3 year old whiny? Terrorist.
Is your 4 year old indecisive? Terrorist.
Does your 5 year old ignore everything you say? Terrorist.
Does your wife never want to have sex? Terrorist
Is your husband always horny? Terrorist.
Does your grandmother complain about health issues constantly? Terrorist.
Seriously, isn't this just a list things that teenagers just do? Like all the time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, this Century we will have a French Revolution Part 2.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The surveillance, etc., is to get us peasants to accept the astroturf "taxation-is-theft" and "government is eeevilll!" baloney. You know, the baloney that led to the deregulation of Wall St. and the banks, and brought in "Right to Work" laws that leave a man I know lying on the floor for at least an hour every night waiting for his hernia to slip back in. He's fallen through the cracks in Obamacare because the state he lives in won't extend Medicare and he can't take time off to get it fixed - they don't provide paid sick days and he's terrified of losing his job. And you wonder why I bash big "L" Libertarians! The market hasn't rushed valiantly in to save this man, has it?!
The push for violent revolution is coming from the right. Increased militarization is coming from... guess where?
The winners would be the ones with the biggest guns and the most of them. That would not be us. They would also have control of the main media outlets and therefore the ability to spin the story to their own advantage. Again, that would not be us. Anyone planning or attempting to take part in an armed revolution would be characterized as a terrorist and vilified in the media before being carted off to prison for a very long stretch, assuming they don't get killed in the clash.
Result: increased militarization of law enforcement and a more paranoid government at local, state, and federal level. Sound good to you? Me neither.
Let's fight this war at the ballot box by voting the bums out at the next election. That will actually work if we can agree on the candidates to vote for. Which is why they're working to divide us. Don't let them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What's old is new again.
Yep. The same thing as the Red Scare when the USSR was still around only now we call our teenagers cave-dwelling terrorists.
Thanks Homeland Security but no thanks. We don't need any tanks around here. I swear this is a convenient excuse to sell off the tanks and swat cars that will never be used otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting
The hotel had a main entrance, but I only used it upon checking in/out. Otherwise, the back/side entrances were more convenient because they were closer to the Exam site.
Also, upon completion of the exam, I did not use the Hotel's wifi to upload my answers, because it positively (negatively?) sucked. Instead, I piggy backed off of a co-tester's hotspot.
Guess I'm guilty :/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another thought
Also,
It's strange. Usually the government tries to get kids to report on their parents, not the other way around.
DAMN WHIPPERSNAPPERS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another thought
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Speaking of the TSA...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess I should go turn myself in...
*not bringing enough baggage,
*using entrances/exits other than the one in the lobby area
*turning down room service.
*Complaining about the TSA.
*Complaining about the water quality.
*Complaining.
*Contributing to Wikileaks (or even frequenting the site).
*Encrypting your data.
Expressing dissatisfaction with government policies.
I didn't realize what a terrorist I am...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I guess I should go turn myself in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously?
If you're going to bullshit me, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE at least make a better effort to make your bullshit BELIEVABLE.
Sincerely,
Fed up with your bullshit
Not for nothing, this list is such a generic crock of shit, that I find it hard to believe she could sell it with a straight face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's cover all the possibilities, YOUR KID IS A TERRORIST
There seem to be several possibilities:
* You support your kids' activities and are laughing at Homeland Security for even suggesting you would report it
* You don't support it, but you would not report your kids, regardless of anything Homeland Security might say.
* Or you don't support it, and WOULD report it, even without prompting from Homeland Security.
Covering other possibilities . . .
Your kid is a terrorist, but you are blissfully unaware. And may not even want to be aware if they 'come out' to you. In this case, Homeland Security's message seems utterly pointless.
Your kid is not a terrorist, in which case Homeland Security's message is utterly irrelevant.
So that leaves me asking, is there any real world case where Homeland Security's message is actually useful, to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who's a what?
Expressing dissatisfaction with government policies.
Writing letters to the Editor about highly controversial subjects.
Hell, he did it, and I just follow his example.
But the difference?
He was a career Army officer-and lots of medals to put on his uniform.
He'd be ashamed to call himself an American today.
Thank goodness he's no longer alive to witness our rapid decline into a totalitarian country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's pretty stinking clear by now:
As it stands. I never want my friend who lives in France to ever come here just so he won't be subject to idiocy by the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
govt response to finding a potential terrorist
won't the FBI just set up a sting to entice the troubled youth into rebelling in some fashion and then arrest the youth for conspiracy to commit a terrorist act?
I mean.. it's what they're doing now, but maybe they're running short of prospects, so they need a bigger pool.
Just a thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: govt response to finding a potential terrorist
Call me paranoid (excuse me while I adjust my tinfoil hat), but I can't help wondering where all the "let's have a revolution" crap is coming from.
Think about it. If I approved of violent rebellion at all, I wouldn't be calling for it in public, anonymously or not, otherwise I might be on the receiving end of an extreme wake-up call somewhere down the line.
This is WHY I keep slapping down people who do. I'm trying to do them � and anyone who might think of joining them � a favor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: govt response to finding a potential terrorist
Calls for revolution are idiotic. In part for the reasons you cite, and in part for practical reasons -- a revolution is most likely to result in a much worse government than we have now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Nonsense. Misguided at times, perhaps, but terrorist? No.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorists
Terrorists; those who stand up for their lawful rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, no...
Is it just me, or does this sound like a complaint?
Oh, Ms. Monaco, you terrorist, you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder how long it'll be before Guantanamo Bay opens a "Summer Camp."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kids these days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two words.
Can ada.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Can ada.
Five words: "outside of the First World".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]