'Radical' Publisher Claims Copyright On Free Collection Of Marx And Engels Works; Orders Them Taken Down
from the because-copyright dept
I have to admit that I had no idea that the Marxist Internet Archive was even a thing, but apparently it is. And it's in the midst of a copyright fight, because some folks representing publisher Lawrence & Wishart -- who, it should be noted, declare themselves as "independent radical publishers" -- have claimed a copyright on many of Marx and Engels' works, and forced them offline. To be fair, the book they're concerned about is the Marx/Engels Collected Works, which was translated and put together over the past few decades -- meaning that new and unique elements of it may very well be under copyright. However, the underlying material, written in the mid-19th century, is absolutely in the public domain. And, yes, the Archive says that other translations of many of the same works will remain online, but the whole thing seems bizarre -- especially given the general views of Marx and Engels. Amusingly, Scott McLemee at Crooked Timber has a decidedly capitalistic suggestion for why L&W might want to reconsider:Somehow it has not occurred to Lawrence & Wishart that, by enlarging the pool of people aware of and reading the Collected Works, the archive is actually expanding the audience (and potential market) for L & W’s books, including the somewhat pricey MECW volumes themselves, available only in hardback at $25-50 per volume. I’m stressing the bottom line here, given that the press’s decision is rational only on the narrowest conception of it.Separately, he points out that economists at the other end of the spectrum seem to get this point pretty clearly:
About the time the Marxist Internet Archive announced that it would be taking down all the MECW material, Corey and I both, by coincidence, were ourselves of radically under-priced materials from the enemy’s publishing apparatus. He’d received an order containing dirt-cheap copies of Bastiat from the Liberty Fund, while a day earlier I had downloaded free digital editions of the major Austrian School books on theory of value and the socialist-calculation debate from the Mises Institute website. There’s more to neoliberal hegemony than loss-leader pricing, but as ideological combatants those people know what they’re doing.I do find it amusing, at times, when we talk about the importance of free as an economic concept, and how copyright abuses can cause serious problems -- and then have people accuse us of being "communist." To me, a centralized system of government granted monopolies that is used to stifle speech can, in many ways, be seen as much more communist than the alternative free market approach that I believe in. And now, it appears that the major supporters of Marxism apparently agree with the idea that copyright is a fundamentally Marxist approach -- so much so that it means that no one can share Marx's works!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, friedrich engels, karl marx, marxism, marxist internet archive, public domain, translations
Companies: lawrence and wishart
Reader Comments
The First Word
“So in essense
The Bourgeoisie are demanding Marxist materials be removed from the Proletariat. Am I basically reading that right?Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Delicious, delicious irony...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
But that said, it does look like the quickest way people have routed around this is to spread the works on the Pirate Bay.
Now that's pretty communist...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
Your complaint is akin to the anarcho-capitalists that claim our current system of crony capitalism isn't really capitalism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
Communism is a classless, stateless society. Meaning you don't have a rich or poor class.
Stalinist Russia required a strong state which was akin to FDR's New Deal liberalism. Further, you didn't give the workers their revolution in Russia since they weren't in charge of the businesses, but the government officials were. That's actually state capitalism, which again is the same as FDR's New Deal.
What Marx meant when he discussed communism was that you had to go through a transitional phase which he termed "Socialism", whereby the worker class owned the means of production. After such a transition, you have Communism, which is classless and stateless.
Basically, he wants a more democratic form of governance than what is available through capitalism, which is why he was such a critic of the capitalist classes. Such works being taken away from the public domain only spur more people to find reasons to take away capitalism and begin finding alternatives to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
Nothing to do with state capitalism at all. Federal programs were enacted to aid the victims of an economic depression created by unfettered capitalism and an unregulated stock market.
What evidence do you have to support the notion that FDR's New Deal was essentially state capitalism?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
You just answered your own question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Delicious, delicious irony...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So in essense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There needs to be some sort of editorial creativity involved for that to be the case. There also needs to be actual copying: ending up with an identical list of compiled works by coincidence would not be considered infringement.
The problem here appears to be not so much that they've included the same works (there is no editorial creativity involved in "let's include everything they've ever written"), but that they've used the same, copyrighted translations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It needs to be revisited, because translation is usually very creative. Languages evolve, and translation from 1850 will be way different then from 1930 or from 2007.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Confusing quote
I think someone accidentally a few words there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Marxists Internet Archive, while understandably disappointed in this development, appreciates the time L&W did let us host those items and hopes to work with L&W in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Letting these more recent works of Marx and Engels be freely distributed far and wide or letting a radical publisher (i'll give them the benefit of the doubt here) profit off of the state-imposed monopoly of the distribution of those works so that the publisher may re-invest that money in their operation and help distribute/disseminate material as they see fit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This what you might call....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's official
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyrights are communist?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyrights are communist?!
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Copyrights are communist?!
Having publishers use copyright to create a new market and take things out of reach even though Marx spoke out against such functions of capitalism point out the irony of the situation, but communism is all about a classless, stateless society, meaning no way for a government to impose monopoly rents for publishers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Copyrights are communist?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Translations
I'm not aware of case law on mechanical translations, but the principles of copyright law dictate that a purely "mechanical" translation would be un copyrightable, IMHO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Translations
But it is still extremely ironic and overwhelmingly hypocritical for a publisher that considers themselves to be radical and pro-Marxist and features troves of books that are extremely critical of capitalism to wield a tool of capitalism to hold a monopoly on the dissemination of the translated works of Marx and Engels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence and Wishart have already lost
https://thepiratebay.se/torrent/6231000/Marxists.org_-_full_English_language_archive
http://www.sends pace.com/file/l7wx0o
Lawrence and Wishart are about to find out they're just as impotent as the music industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can they even do this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That particular AC hasn't been around for a while, Mike. However, I have seen various commenters accuse you of some form of left/liberalism for the views you hold and that's very misguided. In any case, we humans are social creatures and the free exchange of cultural artifacts and items is essential to the wellbeing of a healthy society. And a healthy society is essential to a healthy economy.
Hmmm... I've got a lot of problems with the term "Free Market," basically because it's being used as the linchpin of an ideology that means screwing the public and giving our money to the rich. Seriously, don't get me started on the dubious benefits of supply-side economics or the Austrian School. Mind you, I'm not too keen on Socialism or Communism either. Claiming that we simply must have one or the other is a false dichotomy logical fallacy. Other options exist.
In any case, both sides of the false dichotomy engage in censorship. "You must be a liberal socialist!", anyone? I've been called that so many times I've lost count. While the supply-side crowd will often pay a hefty amount of lip service to the notion that corporations should be broken up and monopolies banned, I can't recall any of the Libertarian-leaning Representatives ever voting against mergers, copyright expansion, patent reforms etc., that were against the public interest.
Since the market will never be totally free, could we call it something else, please? "Fair" or "open" market, perhaps. A fair or open market would permit no special privileges for either suppliers or those on the demand side, and I've always assumed that's what you mean by the term "Free market."
The basic problem I have with Marxism in any form is the same one I have with Libertarianism/Free Market/Supply-side, etc.: the naive assumption of equality of entry and opportunity. The insistence on denying human nature and the refusal to contemplate compensating for it. The sheer audacity of proclaiming that either the state is "the people" or "the people don't need no steenking state."
In this case, the hypocrisy is nothing new; it's okay because their team are doing it. Should they discover anyone they consider to be on the opposing side doing the same thing, expect fireworks — and no sense of irony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Commie countries have IP law
they don't oppose IP at all.
https://c4sif.org/wrongaboutip/#ip-socialist-ussr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]