AP Tells Reporters That Their Stories Are Too Long; Cut Out 'Bloated Mid-Level Copy'
from the but-why? dept
Every so often when we have guest posters here at Techdirt, they ask "what word count are you looking for" and I always provide the same answer: as long as it takes to tell the story you're telling -- no more, no less. This is the internet, and sometimes stories can be quite short and get the point across, and other times they can be quite long. There may be times that we're concerned where a story goes on too long, but that's mainly because it may lead to the key points disappearing in a sea of other stuff. In those cases, we may look for ways to shorten the post, or possibly split it into a multi-part series. But in an age where we don't need to fit things into a limited number of column inches, it seems appropriate to argue that any story should be as long as it needs to be.The Associated Press, it appears, has other ideas. It has sent out a memo to folks that most of its stories need to be shorter:
Citing a “sea of bloated mid-level copy,” Associated Press Managing Editor for U.S. News Brian Carovillano last week instructed fellow editors at the wire service to limit most “daily, bylined digest stories” to a length of between 300 and 500 words. Top stories from each state, Carovillano directed, should hit the 500 to 700-word range, and the “top global stories” may exceed 700 words but must still be “tightly written and edited.”Now, it's true that in many cases (1) the AP is shooting for a much more mainstream audience and (2) they do have to worry about a limited number of column inches. But, still, the idea that stories across the board need to be "shorter" seems like a silly way to deal with it. We could argue (and, plenty of times, we will) that AP stories should be better written, but saying that they should all be shorter seems like a very weak hack to fix bad writing. Why not just focus on writing better?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, word count
Companies: ap, associated press
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, the AP story can be used by the local fish wrap as a source for their story.I have seen stories from my local fish wrap that should have been longer online. They looked like they were shortened to fit a space on physical page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I, for one, couldn't help but notice that today's news of the unfortunate passing of the legendary surrealist artist H.R. Giger on a number of sites were riddled with inaccuracies and bad writing. But, from what I could see, not one of them was over 300 words, most under 150 words.
I expect later, more thorough, articles to be of a far greater quality, and this highlights what the real problem is with low quality reporting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
giger
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/13/hr-giger-dead-alien-artist_n_5314408.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What does 'This is the internet' have to do with getting the point across? Or are you working on filing a patent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is the internet, with unlimited space, so stories can be as long as needed. It's not a physical newspaper with a limited number of pages where stories have to be cut down to fit. Does that help?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> ... we don't need to fit things into a limited number of column inches ...
newspapers ("print" and other physical media) don't have an infinite amount of paper and ink. they are actually quite limited and that limit has been decided well before the stories are written. that's why the reporters are asking about word count - because that's how things were typically measured so as to ensure that there would be enough space on the page to accommodate the entire article.
but, on the internet, those limits of space are so high that they are practically infinite.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I guess it's possible they were just setting up a joke about the old "on the internet" patent pattern.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This explains a lot about the liberal media...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He edits , cutting stories down means less work for him with the same pay. lazy bastid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fair abridgement
“Commentary on Gyles v. Wilcox (1741)” by Ronan Deazley
“We would call a fair abridgment an infringing derivative work today, although it is only since 1909 that there was a general derivative right in the United States.”
—— William Patry (“Fair Use and Fair Abridgment”)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A good first step
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Didn't Noam Chomsky talk about this in *Manufacturing Consent*
He also pointed out that simply reducing the amount of coverage is in itself an excellent way to suppress conflicting and/or more sophisticated understanding of the issues.
(Someone refresh my memory -- Did Orwell reference this in particular, in Nineteen Eighty-Four?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]