Chicago Cops Being Sued After Being Caught On Tape Physically And Verbally Abusing A Massage Parlor Employee
from the always-a-shame-when-the-'wrong'-evidence-surfaces dept
A Chicago woman is suing the city, along with ten police officers, for the abuse she was subjected to during a raid of the massage parlor she worked at. The entire interaction (which lasted more than 40 minutes) was caught on tape by the business' camera system.
Here's the beginning of the raid, which shows Chicago's finest interacting with Jianqing Klyzek using a combination of physical force and verbal abuse.
Here's the charming stuff Officer Di Pasquale had to say to Klyzek during their brief conversation.
Defendant DI PASQUALE: You're not fucking American! I'll put you in a UPS box and send you back to wherever the fuck you came from!Note that this follows Officer Messina asking for permission to tase the 5'2" Klyzek "ten fucking times."
Plaintiff: I'm a citizen, OK?
Defendant DI PASQUALE: No you're not! No, you're not a citizen! No, you're not! No, you're not! You're here on our borrowed time. So mind your fucking business before I shut this whole fucking place down. And I'll take this place and then whoever owns it will fucking kill you because they don't care about you, OK? I'll take this building. You'll be dead and your family will be dead.
Also note -- especially those of you who claim bad cops are anomalies and not representative of the entire force -- that not a single officer (the plain-clothed men lined up against the counter impassively watching a small Asian woman being berated and manhandled by two "uniformed" cops) tried to dial back the aggression or suggested that some of things being said weren't appropriate or helpful. If anyone wants to know why there are so many bad cops, this is part of the problem -- the tacit approval offered by better cops who let this sort of thing happen without intervening.
Not only did these cops not try to defuse a situation that had gotten ridiculously out of hand, but they also assisted Di Pasquale and Messina in their search for the recording device in order to remove the evidence of their misconduct. Unfortunately for them, the device stored recordings off site. (Apparently, this fruitless search made up a large part of the 40-minute "raid.")
Since the officers couldn't find any evidence of prostitution (or human-sized shipping boxes), they fell back on weak claims that Klyzek assaulted an officer by "biting and scratching" as they attempted to restrain her. That failed as well when the judge threw the case out at a preliminary hearing.
But these officers weren't done failing. From the lawsuit:
On information and belief, sometime after the preliminary hearing, one or more of Defendant OFFICERS, contacted an Assistant State's Attorney in order to pursue a Grand Jury indictment for the offense of Aggravated Battery of a Police Officer against Plaintiff.Based on Officer Sako's (allegedly) false testimony, the grand jury indicted Klyzek for aggravated battery. This was swiftly reversed when her lawyer brought some actual evidence to the grand jury.
On January 13, 2014, after viewing the video recording of Plaintiff's arrest, the State's Attorney's Office dismissed the aggravated battery of a police officer charges against Plaintiff.Months later, the Chicago PD has yet to arrive at the same conclusion, despite being in possession of the same recorded evidence.
Police spokesman Adam Collins released a statement saying the matter is being investigated by the Independent Police Review Authority and that "the alleged comments, if true, are reprehensible and completely intolerable in our police department.""If true." So, an officer's word is good enough to secure a grand jury indictment, but a recording -- containing both audio and video -- clearly depicting the chain of events detailed in the lawsuit -- is still up for discussion. If the IPRA ever gets around to using its eyes and ears, maybe it will finally be able to unload Officers Messina and Di Pasquale, something it should have done a half-decade ago.
A separate federal lawsuit alleged that DiPasquale and Messina were among a group of vice squad officers accused of abusing an immigrant during a 2008 prostitution sting. In the 2009 suit, DiPasquale was accused of sticking a gun in one man's face and slamming him into the dashboard of his car, breaking his nose.There's the other reason bad cops are prevalent. The legal system pays victims minimal amounts using taxpayers' money. And those costing the city money simply man a desk or get a few weeks off from work before being given back their badges, guns and, most importantly, power.
The man's attorney, Richard Dvorak, said Monday that the case was settled out of court for less than $100,000.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chicago, intimidation, jianqing klyzek, police
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2633418/Video-shows-abusive-Chicago-police-threatening- deport-woman-UPS-box-f-came-from.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
You watched the videos, so you know what happens...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
With very, very few exceptions, police always get high-court treatment, and their word is accepted as true even when evidence is presented that contradicts it.
This case is half-decent, in that at least the court dropped the charges against the victim, but given the thug with a badge remains employed, rather than rotting in a cell like he tried to make the victim suffer, I'd say the silver lining on the story is pretty small.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
I only hope this aspect is never exported to the United Kingdom when they are famed for firing those officials caught with their pants down. Even PM Cameron can be easily replaced by his own party should they simply believe that someone else can do the job better.
Even the UK Police are held to high regard. Those who show bad behaviour or fail to follow the rules get suspended or reprimanded while those seen to break the law are fired. They don't allow criminals on both sides of the law here for obvious reasons. So had this been the UK that officer would be fired without doubt when there are other people who can do his job better.
In a related fact UK Police shot dead 5 people in the last 4 years where each of these cases made major news headlines where many locals can name all 5 victims. Over in the USA Police officers shot dead 1600 people within this same time-frame. To adjust for population sizes then UK Police would have shot dead 25 people making US Police's 1600 fatality score as 6400% as deadly.
Sure though the USA will go on doing zero to fix these clear problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
Things will not change until the settlements come out of their pension funds. The problem with Chicago is that there is not enough money in their pension to pay for all the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
Things will not change until the settlements come out of their pension funds. The problem with Chicago is that there is not enough money in their pension to pay for all the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anyone else think it's suspicious...
Things will not change until the settlements come out of their pension funds. The problem with Chicago is that there is not enough money in their pension to pay for all the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting phrasing
Why isn't this sociopath under federal indictment for threatening an act of mass murder?
I thought we had some federal agencies somewhere who were kinda sorta tasked with maybe investigating threats of terrorism every now and then if they aren't too busy doing other things. Given that most of the time they're working off rumors and suggestions and hints, I'd think that a 40-minute recorded confession would be a lot more helpful. And since their mission is to defend Americans, why wouldn't they take an immediate and substantial interest in this? It's certainly a far more substantial threat (coming from a heavily-armed man who has already assaulted someone) than more of the ones we hear about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Interesting phrasing
If you or I did that, it would be a federal case, a literal federal case, but, because he's a Law Enforcement Officer with a history of mental illness, we know he's "just kidding."
Same thing here, we all know Pasquale didn't mean it, he's just, you know, "joking", or using "a legitimate 'interview' technique" to converse with the suspect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Interesting phrasing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If there was no recoding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If there was no recoding
Something along those lines I'd imagine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If there was no recoding
We just don't know when and were (usually) because cops destroy the evidence and prosecutors are disinterested in pursuing the cases. Anyone with a badge can torture, rape and kill with impunity AND THEY KNOW IT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Questioning the authority of Krazy Kops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If there was no recoding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If there was no recoding
At that point, the NSA would have intercepted the package and enclosed a recording device - problem solved!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
She scratches you during an arrest, you put her in a UPS box!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That was the sound of your faith being blown away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
People forget an important aspect of the legal system: to discourage victims from taking the law into their own hands.
If they are not sufficiently punished it is left to us to mete out punishment.
Fiat Justitia, et Pereat Mundus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are some good cops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There are some good cops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There are some good cops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There are some good cops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There are some good cops
If you have a 55-gallon drum of pure water with a teaspoon of sewage in it, you have a 55-gallon drum of sewage.
The extension of this metaphor to police departments is left as an exercise for the reader.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: There are some good cops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YouTube's horrendous takedown policy
This sort of thing seems to happen quite often. I was just watching (or trying to watch) YouTube videos showing Ukrainian soldiers shooting protesters in the streets of cities such as Sloviansk/Slavyansk. As many of these depicted shockingly graphic violence, I expected a lot of missing (taken down) videos, as was standard practice during the Iraq occupation. Sure enough, many of these 'war crime' videos from Ukraine were gone, and uploaders' accounts suspended/revoked.
I would have hoped that by now, it would be more widely known that videos posted on YouTube that show anything "controversial" tend to get taken down very quickly, and the uploaders banned. This has been the case throughout YouTube's entire existence (though oddly enough, the now-shuttered Google Video always had a much saner takedown policy, despite being owned by the same company as Youtube).
Regarding Youtube alternatives: I don't know the current favorites, but the LiveLeak.com video site had a reputation of allowing the type of war videos that the US military would probably not have wanted the public to ever see, and RuTube.ru became a favorite of the anti-Scientology community, who were desperately in search of a DMCA-free haven. And Speaking of Scientology, one of the major protesters, Mark Bunker, said he had his worst-ever experience with police in Chicago (working off-duty for the Scientology cult) when he was brutally arrested, and had the videotape from his camera stolen that captured the whole thing. Although that incident happened back in the 1990s, it seems that "Chicago's Finest" are no different today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: YouTube's horrendous takedown policy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: YouTube's horrendous takedown policy
Woman Accuses Chicago Police Of Brutality In Raid Caught On Video
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Except of course, that they aren't. There's well over a million police officers in the US, and you furiously searching the web every day for bad behavior isn't going to make it the norm.
The only prevalent behavior we know for a fact exists is your persistent douchebaggery, displayed with incessant frequency on this ridiculous blog.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bad cop behavior is absolutely the norm around here. It's also the norm for the "good" cops to ignore the abusive behavior of the others. You can claim that this is only an insignificant percentage all you want, but reality disagrees with you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
However, I had to stop because I kept getting pulled over, parking tickets when I was parked legally, stopped repeatedly and frisked for seemingly no reason, and repeatedly found my tail lights broken out with a ticket placed under my windshield wiper. Keeping up with all of this terrible luck made continuing my investigation difficult.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Sounds like you got your results - investigation complete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
> found my tail lights broken out with a ticket placed under my windshield wiper
Sounds like the type of situation that hidden cameras were made for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think it is the case that law enforcement abusing their power has become widely accepted. I live in a city and find that the local police officers, while having been helpful to me in the past, have a tendency to violate laws and their own rules of conduct.
While these cases of particularly egregious behaviors are certainly not the norm, the fact that they are not dealt with swiftly and harshly is very bad. Police officers are SUPPOSED to be held to a higher standard and yet we seem to be going in the other direction and forgiving bad behavior because their job is difficult and dangerous.
I believe being a police officer should be an honorable job and worthy of praise, but that feels less and less like it is the case and the good police officers (which I know there are many) should be the first ones stepping up and stopping/condemning this kind of behavior.
Having one bad officer screaming such things at a woman is one thing, but the fact that all of the other officers did nothing to stop him and possibly attempted to cover up the behavior is shameful and every one of them present should be fired for this single incident.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You know, like Gomer Pyle in Full Metal jacket...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This truth was censored.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Upsetting
The victim was extremely wise/fortunate that her evidence was transmitted off-site (seriously, everyone should do that), but how many people do you think aren't that fortunate?
Does anyone harbor any hope that all of the arrests from these criminal officers are going to be reviewed? (especially for 'missing' evidence)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You think this would have turned out better for her if she had pulled a gun on the cops? She would be dead, and there would be no chance of any consequences for the police. This way, she's alive and well, not facing criminal charges any more, and there's at least a possibility the officers will be punished, and it's because of the video evidence, not violence. How would more guns have made this situation better?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Very, very unlikely. What's more likely is that it will make abusive authority figures even more abusive and prone to using preemptive force.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The solution to abusive police is not more guns, it's holding the police accountable for their crimes. That is harder than just carrying around a Glock, but it has a much better chance of positive change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.”
Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What is the first thing the protesters/people in these countries as for in assistance when facing their own government/military cracking down and taking over their lives? Weapons. (I personally do not like guns, but fully appreciate the right and importance to bear them in protection of home and country from all threats foreign and domestic.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If anything, if gun laws prevented most people from carrying guns, then aggressive/defensive behaviour from officers trying to protect themselves from the possibility of being shot by a perp because they might be carrying a gun would stand out more. Which only makes a difference if the other officers involved are willing to do anything about the bad cop, but it's still a valid discussion point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And a good one. If there were little to no chance of a subject having a dangerous weapon (I'm not saying we should do that, just for discussion), the cops' excuse that they have to shoot/beat/tase people to protect themselves just couldn't hold up. At the other extreme, if it were highly likely any random person is carrying a weapon, then any twitchy or suspicious move (reaching for a tissue or a cell phone) might be cause to draw down or even start shooting. I just don't think the argument that more citizens with guns would result in less police violence holds water.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I think it stands out fine even without removing the guns.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140531/12595127425/six-officers-charged-police-pursuit-that-ende d-with-137-shots-being-fired-suspects-little-over-20-seconds.shtml
I've been stopped while open carrying, and I've been stopped without. The experience was significantly different each time. I may have been unlucky, but it's all the experience I have to draw from...
/Rant
The police have no responsibility to protect the public, and will not be held responsible when they fail to do so. We are all responsible for our own safety. I will not place my family's safety into the hands of someone that has no obligation to protect them. If we can change that, then I would gladly hand over my guns... but good luck with that, there are over 10 major court cases that state that the police are not responsible for protecting you. In essence, the police are about retribution, arresting people after the fact. With that in mind, it's easy to see how they get power crazed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=0
/rant
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'd be satisfied if they were held responsible for actively harming the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The vast majority of no-knock drug raids are against unarmed people - even though the supposed reason for no-knock late night raids is to surprise an armed defender. For those who are truly dangerous and actually armed, they almost never use these tactics.
If not a single non-LEO person had a gun, I doubt police killings would be any lower. Knives are much more deadly within about a 20 foot circle anyway - so would you suggest we ban knives too?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If not a single non-LEO person had a gun, I doubt police killings would be any lower.
The contention is that if more people carried guns, the abuse would be less, and IMO anyway that has not been demonstrated at all.
Knives are much more deadly within about a 20 foot circle anyway - so would you suggest we ban knives too?
I never suggested we ban anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
My contention is not that if MORE people had guns, the abuse would be less... not at all.. My contention is that if NO ONE had guns except the police, there would be MORE abuse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That isn't what you meant by this? "I'm simply saying that if the possibility should exist that she "could" be carrying a firearm, that it would perhaps give the person attempting to trample her rights a reason to pause and think about what they are doing."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I said that if the possibility existed that she COULD...COULD.....COULD C O U L D own a gun.. not omg lets pass out guns to every ass hat with a trigger finger.
Let me put this in perspective. If I was hungry, and I mean really hungry, and you had a nice big McArteryclogging super burger, and i was twice your size... nobody's around.. i would probably beat the break shoes off you and take your tasty burger if i could..... ahhh .. but if you had a dirty hairy style hand bazooka strapped to your leg john homes style I would probably think twice.... If that doesn't make since to you let's just agree to disagree ok?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
OK, the use of a subjunctive to describe something that is actually true threw me off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Threat of civilian packing heat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
By doing so you will not only be conducting valuable hands-on research into the efficacy of this tactic, but you'll be doing an extraordinary service to the species by removing yourself from the gene pool. Congratulations!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Just for the record.. I don't think all cops are bad. They've got a very difficult job no doubt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
For that claim to be true, that would mean there are lots of cases where cops would like to beat someone up or tase them or what have you, but they're afraid to because they think the person might have a concealed weapon and they don't want to get into a gun fight. Sounds pretty implausible to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's risk assessment, we do it in everything we do realizing it or not. You can deny it, but it's happening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's true now. Any person COULD have a gun, so the police are thinking twice about their next move, right? So what would change if MORE people had guns? They would think three times? And I'm pretty sure cops (particularly urban cops) aren't assuming the people they're interacting with are not armed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'd agree with that.
"So what would change if MORE people had guns?"
Probably nothing, but I'm not advocating that anything would change if MORE people had guns, I'm saying that if NO ONE were allowed to have guns, THEN you WOULD see a behavioral change with how the police treat citizens.
"And I'm pretty sure cops (particularly urban cops) aren't assuming the people they're interacting with are not armed."
And again we agree, However, what would be the common assumption on their part if no-one were allowed to have guns? Would their behavior get better or worse? I believe it's worse.. i believe it's human nature that without the threat of violence, humans will always abuse power to some degree. It's sucks, but it's part of what makes us human lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's obviously not a simple question. In countries without a lot of guns, you don't see so much police brutality. Then again, those aren't US police, brought up in a pro-gun culture and accustomed to the idea their lives could be threatened at any time. I don't think it's really clear at all what would happen if that change were made in the US.
i believe it's human nature that without the threat of violence, humans will always abuse power to some degree.
I think you could shorten that. It's human nature to abuse power to some degree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, Tim Cushing hates bad cops.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Though this story has a touch of tech, and plenty of dirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unfortunately, that was a Canadian cop and not a American one.
And I bet Tim Cushing wrote that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Canadian Cop Puts On An Impromptu Clinic On How To Deal With Critics And Cameras
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131212/15041325552/canadian-cop-puts-impromptu-clinic-how -to-deal-with-critics-cameras.shtml
A Little Humanity Goes A Long Way: School Admins, Police Officer Ditch Policy-Limited Thinking To Make A Difference In Teens' Lives
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140513/10013327221/little-humanity-goes-long-way-school-adm ins-police-officer-ditch-policy-limited-thinking-to-make-difference-teens-lives.shtml
And yes, he did write both of those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The head-in-the-sand approach: Not a very good way to solve problems
'Stop looking! If you just ignore it, and don't say anything, the problem will go away!'
'That... doesn't make any freakin' sense. Are you sure?'
'Yes, so stop saying anything, and stop noticing anything!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can just scroll past the stories you're not interested in reading. I doubt the writers have any illusions that every story will interest every reader.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice
http://massagecenterinbangalore.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]