Creator Of Flappy Bird Clone Claims His Duplication Is Covered By Trademark
from the who's-the-actual-moron-in-a-hurry-here? dept
Possibly one of the last bits of cultural detritus from the extremely bizarre Flappy Bird story makes its way to us via chiptune artist Ben Landis, who spotted a rather audacious claim from an entity calling itself "Samuel David Entertainment."
Samuel David Entertainment recently released "Flappy Bird: Remake," a game that appears to be a very slightly altered "Flappy Bird" clone. Despite it being an obvious knockoff, this message appears in the game's "Description."
Please note: 'Flappy Bird: Remake' is trademarked property of Samuel David Entertainment. All items, names, places and other aspects of the game are owned by Samuel David Entertainment.First off, "Flappy Bird: Remake" is certainly not a registered trademarked, at least not in the US. Pending trademark applications for the original Flappy Bird -- filed by Dong Nguyen -- are currently pending in the US Patent and Trademark Office database. And while you don't need to register to have a valid trademark, it's difficult to see how "Flappy Bird: Remake" could even have a common law trademark. Either Nguyen is going to have the trademark or there won't be one. Secondly, it takes a special kind of person to copy someone else's game entirely and then try to prevent future cloning via a bit of peremptory legalese.
Samuel David Entertainment is not affiliated or related to Dong Nguyen and the legacy Flappy Bird.
Should you have any enquiry regarding intellectual property issue please contact us at outlet.shopapp@gmail.com
Samuel David couldn't even be bothered to use his own screenshot on the game's iTunes page.
> Note that the shot still contains the "© .GEARS 2013" message put there by the game's original creator, .GEARS. And the infringement runs into multiple layers, considering the original Flappy Bird was accused of utilizing Nintendo assets, something this clone would contain as well.
Adding to the sheer ridiculousness is the fact that the "Flappy Bird: Remake" support page is… a Vietnamese news website.
You know, if you're just going to clone someone else's game, at least have the self-awareness to realize that trying to "protect" your "work" (especially with bogus claims) going forward just makes you look like an idiot, and a hugely disingenuous one at that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: clone, copy, copyright, dong nguyen, flappy bird, flappy bird remake, samuel david, trademark
Companies: gears, samuel david entertainment
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It makes for a weird contrast when I regularly see open source stuff with entirely original characters under cc-by-(sa)/gpl and then going to read an author who doesn't want you to copy her/his generally shitty not very original original character despite being introduced in a copied universe and being itself derived from it.
What the fork?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm sure you have other redeeming qualities ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Identical clones are bad
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/plucked/id849718346?mt=8
[ link to this | view in chronology ]