Awesome Stuff: Want To Make Sure The Internet Stays Open And Free For Innovation?
from the tooting-our-own-horn-a-bit dept
Each week, we post an "awesome stuff" post that looks at a few interesting (and sometimes not so interesting) crowdfunding projects. This week, however, we're doing our own. On Monday, we launched a crowdfunding campaign to support our coverage of net neutrality. The idea is to let us put more resources towards really digging into every aspect of this battle. We're a very small team trying to cover a variety of subjects, and we work quite hard at it, but if we can dedicate greater efforts towards this important debate, we're hoping to really dig deep and look at what's really happening -- beyond just the basic headlines of what's out there.and double your impact right now! »
We were able to do that with the SOPA/PIPA fight, but as I mentioned in our last post, doing so meant that we lost big on the advertising side. While that didn't stop us, we'd rather not have to worry about that, but rather just focus on just getting you the best reporting we can. While we've written hundreds of stories on net neutrality, here are a few memorable ones to highlight the kinds of things we want to be able to keep bringing you:
- How telco astroturfers tried to bring down review of a book about net neutrality
- What inefficient airline boarding processes have to do with net neutrality
- Asking if Comcast CEO Brian Roberts would pay Netflix's bandwidth bill, after he claimed it was "free."
- Verizon lobbyists pretending that "blind, deaf and disabled people" are supportive of an internet fast and slow lane
- Looking at whether or not broadband providers are violating FTC rules by lying about what they're delivering to customers
- Discussing how Verizon loves to be classified under Title II in order to get subsidies and tax breaks, but pretends it would be deathly if it were expanded
Once again, if you donate now, there are matching funds that we get from a group of donors, meaning that every dollar you give creates twice as much impact. Please consider supporting this effort. We won't let you down.
and double your impact right now! »
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: awesome stuff, crowdfunding, innovation, net neutrality
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 12th, 2014 @ 1:17pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Better yet, who's offering the matching grant?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I wouldn't be shocked to see Lessig's new PAC as a donor and / or supporter. I could also picture the groups that have had recent highlighting posts (like kickstarter) about net neutrality recently.
The bigger concern here may be more to do with legal. Without transparency, there is no way to know if a post is in whole or in part paid for by a contributor, even as they may be the subject of the story.
A little transparency would go a very long way here. Knowing the two 5K donors and the matching funds group would go a long way to explaining what is actually behind this semi-covert fund raising campaign.
You have to wonder too... Techdirt has been covering this really well without the extra money (so goes the claim), so what does the extra money bring (besides an improved bottom line)?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
1) When will you identify yourself in your profile?
2) Are you a member of the club whose logo you are using as an avatar?
3) Do they know you are using it in association with posts that have nothing to do with the clubs purpose?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
2)not relevant, doesn't matter
3)see above.
Your troll hand is weak.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
IOW...
"I can't come up with any original criticism so I'll just regurgitate the oldest and lamest of the anti-Techdirt tropes."
Or... is that really you AJ!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We'll be revealing that soon. The folks at Beacon are still trying to finalize a few additional matching grants, and after discussing it with them, we agreed to hold off announcing who's providing the matching grants until they're finalized so that they're all on equal footing.
Suffice it to say the "speculation" in these other comments is way, way, way, way off. Ditto for the event sponsors. I'll ask the two event sponsors (one of which signed on yesterday) if they're okay with being named at this point, but I know who both of them are, and they're both entrepreneurs not associated with any large company or any sort of political group. Both are just long-time fans of Techdirt, as is the case with the donors of matching funds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It doesn't look like Beacon supports Paypal, so the answer appears to be no. If you would still like to support us, but only use Paypal, you can do so at our Insider Shop:
https://rtb.techdirt.com/
Thanks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Ninja on Jul 14th, 2014 @ 4:38am
/cast Bacon of Light
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not a one-time option below $30?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why not a one-time option below $30?
It's how Beacon is set up. If you would like to just give $5, you could sign up for the recurring option and then cancel after the first round is charged. I recognize that's not all that appealing.
You could also support us via our Insider Shop: https://rtb.techdirt.com/ though that won't get funds matched, nor would it count towards hitting our target number in this campaign.
I realize those may be second best options, so I apologize for that, but that's all we can do at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]