Guy Files Dishwasher User Manual As An FCC Comment On Net Neutrality
from the performance-art? dept
The FCC has confirmed that over 1 million comments have already been filed in the open comment period concerning net neutrality and the open internet. The official comment period closes tonight at midnight (and even that's kind of meaningless because there's a "reply" commenting period for the next few months that will let people respond to initial comments), and we've started sorting through some of the many comments filed. We'll be highlighting some interesting comments and trends that we spot, but last night I found one filing so odd, it deserved a quick post on its own.Kurt Schaake of Lawrence, Kansas, appears to have filed the Dishwasher User Instruction manual for a Whirlpool dishwasher as his comment.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: comments, dishwasher manual, fcc, kurt schaake, net neutrality, nprm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
An installation manual for a toilet would be more appropriate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trust me when I say that irrelevant filings in this FCC database - political statement or not - are most certainly plentiful!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps ...
We all know the FCC is, statistically speaking, most likely to do whatever the moneyed interests want without regard to the interests and opinions express by the public commentary.
Perhaps this is his way of illustrating his recognition of the probable futility of commenting, and at the same time participating in the process. Like writing "Maytag Repairman" on your ballot ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Going Viral, Anyone?
So, a no-brainer manual for the FCC! Brilliant!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To assist with washing their dirty money
He's just trying to be helpful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: To assist with washing their dirty money
It's like the cat leaping onto every layer of bedding you're trying to change:
I AM HERE TO BE *NOT* HELPING!
YOU'RE WELCOME!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consumers are passengers on a ship that must be guided carefully between the twin dangers of the bottomless vortex of over-regulation (Charybdis) and the ravenous appetite of corporate interests (Scylla).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, why not?
Come now, surely you don't think a comment system which crumples under modest load was actually intended to work? Please. Spare me. The idiots, the fools, the naive suckers busily sharing their thoughts with the FCC might as well be sending dishwasher manuals and cat pictures for all the good it will do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whirlpool.net.au
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, his cousin (who lives several thousand miles away) desperately needed help with that particular model of dishwasher, and the FCC comment page was the only way to share the document due to the fact that his heavily-filtered internet connection at work is set up to block sites for sharing files and/or documents.
[/OccamsRazor]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rebuilding Iraq
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: rebuilding Iraq
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have a pretty good guess as to why he did it
My guess is that the same thing happened to Schaake, but that he never actually managed to get through to the right page. Being unable to type in a comment, he instead uploaded an irrelevant document as a form of protest.
I must say, by my third attempt, I was on the verge of uploading something myself. It would have to be something relevant, though -- something representative of what the FCC seemingly arranges for American consumers to do every time the country's media, cable, ISP, and telecoms oligopolies come before it with new demands. It would have to be a goatse pic. But since I was pretty sure a goatse pic wouldn't make it into the public record, I just fired up Tor Browser instead and described in a more socially palatable manner the many ways in which I felt I had been personally goatse'ed by the FCC commissioners' past and future benefactors and requesting that, if possible, the FCC consider doing something to make it stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Puzzling
Since the FCC's normal process is very likely "ERASE COMMENTS.DB", it seems like someone out there is spending a lot of time going through comments for nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Puzzling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Puzzling
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6018210584
I wonder if that site has the emailed comments as well. A simple search for my name on the date I sent it did not return results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Puzzling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Puzzling
I think the more likely explanation is that Kurt Schaake tipped-off TechDirt as a way of publicizing his own stupid comment.
But hey, First Amendment, YAY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He wanted to upload a file called "Why Net Neutrality is Good", but his finger slipped and he uploaded "Whirlpool Dishwasher Manual" instead, and found no way to delete it.
[/OccamsRazor]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Frivolous" comments are illegal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Agree or disagree? why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]