That Time The US Government Sought To Secretly Delete Parts Of A Public Court Transcript About The NSA
from the literally-rewriting-history dept
The EFF has revealed a very disturbing attempt by the US government to flat out secretly delete portions of a public court transcript over the belief that its lawyers may have slipped up and revealed classified information. This came from the recent hearing in the longstanding EFF case Jewel v. NSA, regarding a challenge to NSA surveillance (which began long before the Snowden revelations). After the hearing ended, apparently things took a turn for the bizarre, in which the government quietly notified the judge that it believed one of its attorneys had accidentally revealed classified information during the (very open) hearing, and hoped to remove that information from the transcript, and pretend that it never happened. The EFF fought it, and eventually the government backed down (perhaps realizing it hadn't really revealed anything):On June 6, the court held a long hearing in Jewel in a crowded, open courtroom, widely covered by the press. We were even on the local TV news on two stations. At the end, the Judge ordered both sides to request a transcript since he ordered us to do additional briefing. But when it was over, the government secretly, and surprisingly sought permission to “remove” classified information from the transcript, and even indicated that it wanted to do so secretly, so the public could never even know that they had done so.It's great that this ended well, but it seems immensely troubling that the government even sought to do this in the first place. Of course, I would imagine this might lead some to scour the full transcript (embedded below) to see if there's any tidbit of information that the government didn't really mean to claim.
We rightly considered this an outrageous request and vigorously opposed it. The public has a First Amendment right not only to attend the hearing but to have an accurate transcript of it. Moreover, the federal law governing court reporting requires that “each session of the court” be “recorded verbatim” and that the transcript be certified by the court reporter as “a correct statement of the testimony taken and the proceedings had.” 28 U.S.C. § 753(b).
The Court allowed the government a first look at the transcript and indicated that it was going to hold the government to a very high standard and would not allow the government to manufacture a misleading transcript by hiding the fact of any redactions. Ultimately, the government said that it had *not* revealed classified information at the hearing and removed its request.But the incident speaks volumes about the dangers of allowing the government free rein to claim secrecy in court proceedings and otherwise.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: court transcript, doj, jewel v. nsa, nsa, rewriting history, secret, surveillance
Companies: eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Secret Squirrel is working overtime to make America exceptional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Judge: "Wait what?"
Govt: "Some people must also unsee things and unlearn what was described."
Judge: "That's unconstitutional and impossible."
*Govt holds a neurolizer up in the air*
Govt: If you'd just look here for a second...
*fires neurolizer*
Govt: Now, it's just a duck. It looks like a duck and acts like a duck so it is a duck.
*judge and the public drool*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Govt: Now, it's just a duck. It looks like a duck and acts like a duck so it is a duck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trial Balloon
A) refused, nothing ventured nothing gained, oh well end (for now)
B) accepted, WIN now lets do some real damage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Minitru.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This time it went well
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The degree to which the USG is emulating "1984" is truly disgusting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd jokingly call this a tinfoil hat comment but their actions and what's been revealed only validate the statement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry, no record available.
In a sane world, a digital video camera would be trained on the witness box, it's clock ticking away the seconds down in the lower right-hand corner of the monitor, recording to multiple hard drives. That would be the official, self-authenticating record. A transcript could be produced therefrom. Such systems exist & there are plenty of people who know how to make it all happen. But that's not what we're gonna have. It will be so blatant, there won't even be a sham "stenographer." EXACTLY as if the whole proceeding never even happened.
The only worse scenario I can envision would be secret courts---& we already have those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fascism vs Freedom
Because the sympathetic Lame-Stream media REFUSES to report their lying Fascism to the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Word
“