Australian Movie Studio Boss Skips Out On Public Q&A, Claiming It Will Be Filled With 'Crazies'
from the respecting-the-public dept
Last month we wrote about a new copyright reform proposal in Australia, which is basically Hollywood's wishlist. It was put together by George Brandis, who completely flat out ignored the proposals of the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), despite it going through a long and detailed process to come up with quite reasonable reforms. Instead, Brandis buddied up with Hollywood insiders representing US interests, and totally ignored consumer groups.In response to the proposal, Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull (who has, apparently, been pushing for more reasonable rules to dilute Brandis' extreme proposals) said that a public hearing would be held in September to discuss the proposal, getting a variety of stakeholders in the room together, including consumer rights groups. The major Australian studio, Village Roadshow (the "token" Australian studio in the failed Hollywood-driven effort to sue ISP iiNet a few years back), has apparently decided to opt out of attending the session. While the company's CEO Graham Burke originally said he couldn't make it because he'd be overseas, he actually told Turnbull that he was skipping it because he didn't want to deal with "crazies," by which he apparently means the public who are concerned about their rights being trampled:
“My company is not prepared to participate in the forum. As expressed to you previously these Q and A style formats are judged by the noise on the night and given the proposed venue I believe this will be weighted by the crazies,” Burke told the Minister.Nice to see what they really think of the public and concerns about how the new rules might trample free speech, an open internet or the nature of innovation. It's a pretty weak argument, showing real desperation when someone insists that the concerns being raised by public interest groups and ISPs about significant legal changes that will have a major impact on the internet as a whole, are just "a miniscule group whose hidden agenda is theft of movies." No one's "agenda" is "theft of movies." People are legitimately concerned about the consequences of putting liability on ISPs over actions of their users. The near certain response is to lead to massive censorship, blocking of free speech, and much greater expenses for consumers -- none of which will have any real impact on infringement of movies.
[....]
“What is at stake here is the very future of Australian film production itself and it is too crucially important to Australia’s economy and the fabric of our society to put at risk with what will be a miniscule group whose hidden agenda is theft of movies,” Burke told the Minister.
It seems quite telling, actually, that Burke apparently recognizes that he has no good responses to these concerns, and can only respond through insults and ad hominems.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, copyright, copyright reform, george brandis, graham burke, malcolm turnbull, public comment
Companies: village roadshow
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is a reason why these policies in making are always behind closed doors with no public invited. If the public knew what they were up to they would be out in the streets protesting these actions. It can't stand the light of day shining in on the real crazies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's because they're vampires, sucking money out of everything and leaving nothing but a corpse behind to rot away, all to fuel their insatiable hunger.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds familiar
Hey, where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, from the shills and trolls that comment here! Smells like a published talking point to me.
Of course, it's complete bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crazies...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crazies...
Fucking idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I win 100%
Can I start using that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I win 100%
Completely eliminates the crazies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A 'variety of stakeholders' could include movie studios, production companies, performance rights groups, lobbyists, etc.
I think it sounds like a bunch of crazies too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Society is at risk unless the Australian film industry is allowed to Save The Day? No I think that's already been done, that was Invasion of the Body Snatchers right? Get me a better plot, and oh yeah get me some better actors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Self-fulfilling prophecy: Go, and it will be filled with crazy. Stay home to avoid the crazy, and it won't be there.
Everybody wins!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually that's exactly what the agenda is. Everyone is willing to admit that but you and that's why you people are refered to as crazies. The End.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Even internet pirates have the potential to be customers. You know why? Because setting up torrenting software can actually be pretty difficult. You have to configure it to account for proxies, firewalls, and such, and difficulties such as lack of peers and swarms of leechers with no seeders can make torrenting movies frustrating to do.
As Redbox and Netflix have shown, if you make movies conveniently available, even pirates will pay for them just so they can avoid a lot of hassle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fancy thinking that the Australian public should have an equal say to the American corporations when it comes to Australian laws. CRAZY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Who is this "everyone" you refer to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That is *your* agenda.
You need to stop lying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fabric of our society = middle men overcharging and promoting artificial scarcity?
We clearly aren't living in the same society.
as usual they are totally unwilling to address the issues caused by them and only them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That little snippet was my favourite part of Burke's comments and what it's all about. In other words we will continue to screw Australian consumers and you can't do anything. The man is a Grade A Wanker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just as well Australia isn't at war with the US
Otherwise Brandis could be shot as a traitor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a sign of the times when even a coal mining magnate like Clive Palmer is actually more reasonable than the governing regime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Village Idiot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not any more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]