Health Experts Issue Call To Prevent ICANN's Commercialization Of New .health Domain Leading To Exclusive Control Of Online Health Information
from the enough-is-enough dept
Last month, we wrote about a troubling decision by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to give control over the new .pharmacy domain to big pharma -- thus allowing it to lock out sites around the world that threaten its generous profit margins. An article in the journal "Globalization and Health" warns that something similar could be about to happen in the realm of public health:
In just a few weeks, the Internet could be expanded to include a new .health generic top-level domain name run by a for-profit company with virtually no public health credentials -- unless the international community intervenes immediately. This matters to the future of global public health as the "Health Internet" has begun to emerge as the predominant source of health information for consumers and patients.
The paper, which is open access, and can therefore be read for free in its entirety, gives some hypothetical examples of what could happen:
http://www.[smoking].[health](potentially purchased by a tobacco company)
The paper's authors explain:
http://www.[vaccinatekids].[health](potentially purchased by anti-vaccine activists)
http://www.[obesity].[health](potentially purchased by a junk food company)
http://www.[cancer].[doctor](potentially purchased by unscrupulous vendors catering to the desperate dying)Despite this increasing use and reliance on online health information that may have inadequate quality or reliability, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently announced it intends to move forward with an auction to award the exclusive, 10 year rights to the .health generic top-level domain name. This decision is being made over the protests of the World Medical Association, World Health Organization, and other stakeholders, who have called for a suspension or delay until key questions can be resolved.
ICANN responded to those concerns by asking the International Chamber of Commerce to decide whether a company, rather than a health organization, should be allowed to run the .health domain. No surprise what the outcome was:
a rejection of challenges filed by ICANN’s own independent watchdog and others, such that ICANN's Board decided in June 2014 that there are "no noted objections to move forward" in auctioning the .health generic top-level domain name to the highest bidder before the end of the year.
"No noted objections" if you exclude important chunks of the world's medical community, that is. Or perhaps ICANN simply meant "no noted objections from the companies that stand to gain the most from controlling this lucrative domain". The paper's authors conclude:
we call for an immediate moratorium/suspension of the ICANN award/auction process in order to provide the international public health community time to ensure the proper management and governance of health information online.
In fact, we need to go much further. Rather than simply calling for a moratorium on the auction of these new domains, we should be calling for ICANN itself to be abolished, and replaced with an organization that is concerned with maximizing the global benefits of running the Internet domain system and not, as presently seems the case, with maximizing the profits of a few lucky companies. ICANN has had long enough to show that it is a worthy guardian of this unique and critical resource; it has failed to do so. Time to get rid of it.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: .health, control, health, profit, tlds, top level domains
Companies: icann
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ICANN is corrupt to the bone
And that is why best practice is to use DNS RPZ to cause the myriad of new TLDs to disappear from your view of the Internet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just get it over with
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The TLD is of only minor relevance to PageRank
PageRank isn't going to be fooled, regardless of under what authority the new domain is created. If the most relevant health-related websites are under .health, they will be highly ranked. If not, then they won't.
If I were in the health care business, I would focus on creating a valuable site and service for my customers, and worry a lot less at which specific characters appear in the URL bar.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here here!
HERE HERE!!!
Ehud Gavron
Tucson AZ
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Do people actually pay attention to TLDs in this way?
That's about it.
I agree with Dave; PageRank took centre stage away from TLDs years ago. People could use IPs now, and other than the fact that they don't vhost well, and address mobility is limited, there'd be little difference.
I pay more attention to a site's SSL certificate than I do to the TLD.
That said, if they auctioned off a country's domain (oh wait, like .su, .cc, .cz, .co, etc already have)... what am I saying? That would make blocking things easier too.
I'd have issues with .edu being sold off, except that all educational institutions I've had a direct relationship with didn't use a .edu TLD.
So yeah... what's the issue again?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TLDs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Do people actually pay attention to TLDs in this way?
You're saying this shouldn't be an issue because it doesn't personally impact you is a little like my saying, I don't see why I should care about Net Neutrality since I only use the Internet for Facebook (I don't) or I don't care if the government is collecting my geolocation records because I don't go anywhere interesting.
Every time corporate or special interests co-opt a piece of the Internet's future for their own purposes, the Internet takes another step towards becoming an instrument for the few versus a platform for the many. And I think that's reason enough to oppose it.
Beyond that, there are reasons you should care:
1. Not everyone who uses the Internet is as savvy as you and the more for profit health providers are able to control the flow of information to (at least some) patients -- recommending pricey treatments and medications that patients might not need -- the more health care costs go up. Sky rocketing health care costs hurt everyone in the form of increased taxes and/or loss of government services, the availability of treatments and your employer's ability to raise your wages among many other things.
2. Opportunity Cost. Yes, you have a way to avoid the negative consequences of .health being purchased by a for profit spammer, but might you have benefitted from .health being used for a different purpose? Like...what if -- for example -- instead of selling .health to the highest bidder, ICANN granted it to a non-profit to turn it into a global health care wiki that would gather the collective wisdom and experience of doctors and health care experts around the world. Thus giving you immediate access to unbiased information and making it harder for pharma and other for profit actors in the health care sphere to control the flow of information re: their products, hide adverse effects, studies, etc....
ICANN is shaping the future of the Internet and steps like this not only take the Internet in the wrong direction, they mean we're forgoing an opportunity to take the Internet in a positive direction.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Do people actually pay attention to TLDs in this way?
As far as #1, that's probably not that serious of a problem. Most non-tech-savvy people I know, at least, don't use URLs to go to websites other than google.com. I've watched people going to google and typing "yahoo mail" in the search box because that's how they get to their mail. And even with or without the .health tld, you won't be able to stop less scrupulous people from giving bad information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ignoring the new TLDs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ICANN's disregard of public health objections is scandalous
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Do people actually pay attention to TLDs in this way?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Do people actually pay attention to TLDs in this way?
I'd also argue that the threat here isn't just scam sites looking for ways to cheat your grandparents out of their life savings (although those folks definitely exist), you're also dealing with a multi-billion health care industry that is already out there paying doctors millions to recommend their treatments over others. This is just an educated guess, but I'll bet good money that you're going to see major pharmaceutical companies and/or medical device company's buying up the TLDs associated with the diseases they treat. e.g. juvenilediabetes.health and then they'll invest a million (which is no skin off their nose) to make it the best resource for the disease out there. It won't just be informative, it will be useful. You'll be able to chat online with a doctor and find support on message boards, read inspirational stories and learn strategies for educating your kid on the disease. It will be so great that it will become the go-to site for any family fighting the disease. The only problem with the site will be their treatment recommendations. They're not dumb, they won't recommend their products for everyone, just almost everyone. They also won't publish the downsides of their medications or any adverse effects of their medication, which yes, parents can find on other sites, but they won't look for that information until/unless something goes wrong. Yes, ideally, doctors wouldn't prescribe medication just because a patient asks for it, but if that was the case, why do pharmaceuticals advertise so extensively? (Also these companies market to doctors so these would just be an extension of those efforts.)
I'm not saying my #2 (which I thought up in 30 seconds as I typed that response) is the answer. Although I do think a health wiki that you accessed simply by typing diseasename.health (vs. having to go through an entire wiki site would be helpful) but I do think its worth thinking through what the opportunity cost is here of not taking this opportunity to set up incentives to populate the Internet with useful, unbiased health information for patients versus giving for-profit health interests an unending stream of avenues to market themselves. Again, I'm not suggesting that I have the answer or that the answer is easy, only that it's a problem that we should be looking for ways to address.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
SomaGenix
Somagenix,a leading supplier of API’s and steroid hormone powders in Hong Kong. Our state of the art facility employs top chemical engineers and technicians while meeting quality assurance and compliance with North American and European standards. Our company allocates a substantial percentage of its investment towards Research and Development as we believe it is crucial in meeting market demands and innovation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]