Judge Issues $5 Million Award To Dow Jones In Hot News Case... But It's Meaningless
from the hot-news? dept
In January, we wrote about Dow Jones suing Ransquawk, a UK-based service that sends out news alerts to clients. Dow Jones used the antiquated and obsolete concept of "hot news" misappropriation, since there was no actual copyright claim to be made. For years, we've discussed the problematic nature of the hot news doctrine, which some news companies just can't let go of using. In May, we noted that Ransquawk basically ignored the legal process (though it had publicly commented on the lawsuit), leading to a default judgment against Ransquawk. That's what happens when you don't show up in court. This week, the judge officially awarded Dow Jones $5 million in the case, which is again fairly meaningless. In theory, Dow Jones can go after Ransquawk for the money, but it doesn't appear that it has any US-based assets to attack.While some who don't follow the details and don't understand the nature of a default judgment may make a bigger deal of this, the ruling is kind of meaningless since there was no actual adversarial process here. But, really, the bigger issue is that hot news is just a concept that needs to go away. In an age of social media sharing, retweeting, forwarding, reposting, etc., the idea that someone can claim some sort of exclusive ownership over "breaking" news is just silly and pointless. If your entire value is wrapped up in being a few minutes ahead of the competition, and you can't stand someone repeating the news that you were still first in getting out, you've got other, much more serious problems with your business model.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: default judgment, hot news, misappropriation, news, squawk services
Companies: dow jones, ransquawk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
To destroy a bad law, simply apply it equally
Just a few cases of individual bloggers or smaller news groups stopping the major news agencies from reporting on something big and you can bet they'd suddenly be crying out about 'unfair' it was that individuals could stop others from reporting on the news, and calling for 'Hot news' laws to be tossed(or simply re-written in their favor).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hot News Doctrine
It does seem antiquated, at best.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Breaking stories are often wrong
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Domain name is vulnerable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Domain name is vulnerable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Domain name is vulnerable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Breaking stories are often wrong
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Domain name is vulnerable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Domain name is vulnerable
Even if they used a ".co.uk" domain, this is run by Nominet, which is a US company. I wonder what would happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Domain name is vulnerable
[ link to this | view in thread ]