Dorian Nakamoto Wants To Sue Newsweek -- But It Seems Unlikely To Succeed And Could Cause More Problems For Him
from the freedom-of-the-press-isn't-always-pretty dept
As you may recall, earlier this year, Newsweek "relaunched" with a cover story by reporter Leah McGrath Goodman claiming to have unmasked the real creator of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was created by someone (or some people) using the name Satoshi Nakamoto, but no one knew who it really was, and over the past few years Nakamoto had more or less disappeared from the Bitcoin scene. Newsweek claimed that Nakamoto was really a person named Satoshi Nakamoto, who actually goes by the name Dorian Nakamoto. The article was weakly sourced, heavy on speculation and based its key arguments on some really clueless assumptions. The most ridiculous parts involved the "forensic analysis" that Newsweek supposedly relied on in identifying Nakamoto. Specifically, this "forensic analyst" looked at the original Bitcoin paper and noted what she said were "old-school technological tropes" -- specifically, discussions about saving disk space, mentioning Moore's Law, and the use of two spaces after a period. This, according to Newsweek, pointed to a much older engineer:"The idea of conserving any kind of resources, and this is part of my formation, my long background in systems testing, that was a critical issue. But those are very very old-time concerns," she said. "To even mention disk space, things like that — disk space is cheap! And Moore's Law is an old maxim that computing power will double. We've gone exponentially away from Moore's law, but that was what it was all about in that interim period."Except that while disk space is cheap, the size of the Bitcoin blockchain is a big deal since the whole basis of Bitcoin relies on an ever growing blockchain, and if you didn't figure out ways to minimize the need to redownload the entire blockchain, it would create a massive problem for Bitcoin. The concerns about space weren't archaic at all, but right on point. As for the claim that "we've gone exponentially away from Moore's law"? I mean, that's just flat out wrong.
Either way, it became pretty clear pretty quickly that Dorian Nakamoto wasn't Satoshi Nakamoto -- though Newsweek (bizarrely) still stands by its story. The latest, however is that Dorian Nakamoto has launched a crowdfunding effort to sue Newsweek on a website called NewsweekLied (and for those wondering, Nakamoto's lawyer has confirmed the page is legit).
I sympathize with Nakamoto, having his life shaken up by a shoddy reporting job, plucking him out of obscurity and incorrectly naming him as the creator of Bitcoin. But... I have a lot of trouble seeing how any lawsuit could possibly make sense. In fact, it seems likely that any lawsuit could actually make things worse for Dorian Nakamoto. From the details on the website, it appears that they're likely to use a combination of false light and defamation claims. Both would be pretty difficult to prove, though false light is perhaps a lower bar in this case. The real problem, though, is that most of what is in the article could be considered to reflect positively on Nakamoto, rather than negatively. Claiming he was a secret, if eccentric, creator of a global cryptographic currency phenomenon? Even if it's false (as it appears to be), how would that be "highly offensive to a reasonable person" as required under California law?
As for a defamation claim, they probably wouldn't have to show "actual malice" since Nakamoto wasn't a public figure (though, potentially Newsweek would argue that the Nakamoto they thought they were identifying was a public figure, and thus the higher bar should apply), but they would still have to show the harm to Nakamoto's reputation, leading to the same problem as the false light issue.
Also, Nakamoto's lawyers would likely have to show that Newsweek knew the story was wrong (which doesn't appear to be the case) or that it was "negligent" in reporting the story. While I think we agree that Newsweek was sloppy and there was just generally bad reporting and bad conclusions involved, to reach the level of negligence is not easy.
And here's where it gets even more difficult for Nakamoto. As we've discussed many times in the past, California (thankfully!) has a strong anti-SLAPP law that protects publishers from being sued in an attempt to silence their reporting on issues of public interest. We're big fans of California's anti-SLAPP laws and you'd have to imagine that Newsweek would seek to be protected under that law. And, the bigger issue for Nakamoto is that under California's anti-SLAPP law, if Newsweek were to win, it can go after Nakamoto for its legal fees. And, the law actually would allow Newsweek to go even further, and file a SLAPPback lawsuit, to seek compensatory and punitive damages (though, that might be a longshot for Newsweek).
As ridiculous as the original article was, and as sympathetic as I may be to Dorian Nakamoto's situation, it's difficult to see how his lawsuit has much of a chance. Conceivably, there could be other claims made, or additional evidence that Nakamoto's lawyers think they have on Newsweek, but it seems like a massive longshot and a situation that could potentially create more legal headaches for Nakamoto than it solves.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-slapp, bitcoin, california, defamation, dorian nakamoto, false light, inventor, leah mcgrath goodman, satoshi nakamoto, slapp
Companies: newsweek
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
Computer science and mathematics people often write papers in LaTeX.
Ergo, two spaces after a period point to someone who ofter writes papers in LaTeX, therefore, it points to someone in the computer science or mathematics fields, irregardless of their age.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
While I agree with this article stating that using/knowing about using 2 spaces after a period isn't a good indication of age, your comment has basically reinforced the argument that it is a good indicator of age ;)
Also, 2 spaces are still sorta used after a period. With proportional fonts, the size of the space between the period and next letter is automatically set by the font, the actual measurement may be in fact equivalent to 2 spaces (even tho as it's only registered as 1 space). If you enter 2 spaces into a WYSIWYG editor (word and whatever other word processors are around today), or 1 space, or 5 spaces, it'll automatically adjust the distance between the period and the letter to what is defined in the font definition. Therefore you don't have to manually add any spaces at all if you don't want to. If you use a mono-spaced font (or a plain text editor like notepad or what have you) tho then you might have to enter the number of spaces you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
I just tried it using Word 2007 and Word 2013. Both kept the two spaces. Granted, at some point I will have turned off "automatic bulleted lists" and other annoyances.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
Also, I note that my very modern phone inserts a period whenever I type two spaces in a row.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Two spaces after a period == LaTeX
No, it's not. I've been doing this ever since starting using emacs. Then again, I may have learned this behaviour from LaTeX at the same time I was learning emacs. Whatever, ESC-q to reformat a paragraph leaves two spaces between sentences.
... To my chagrin. I recently learned this's been driving one of my friends nuts, because recent webbish developments transmute those two spaces into $something_else when rendered by HTML-ish/webbish interfaces. I can't imagine why it's bothering, but $kids_these_days. Meh.
I really hate it when computers/software try to tell me I'm doing something wrong, when I know it's doing it wrong based on its shallow assumption of "what's right." !@#$ off! Computers are supposed to do what we tell them to do (barring obviously (standards incompliant) ignorant assumptions on our part), not the other way around.
Hmm. Why am I thinking of e. e. cummings right now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
True Names
And not in a "crazy like a fox" way, since it'd inevitably lead to people looking closer at you anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the lawsuit's biggest weakness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the lawsuit's biggest weakness
Again, as stated in the article, I'm not sure "actual malice" standard applies, since he wasn't a public figure. Though, they could argue that Satoshi was a public figure... But still...
Newsweek has too well of a consistent, established history of journalistic incompetence.
Except this is Newsweek in name only. This was the relaunch of an entirely new publication. Same in name only.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: the lawsuit's biggest weakness
The AUTHOR of Bitcoin MAY be a public figure, but Satoshi is saying he's not the author. If HE's not the author, then HE isn't a public figure. Wouldn't Newsweek have to prove that Satoshi is a public figure, and to do that wouldn't they have to prove (at least to a standard of on the balance of probabilities test) that he is the author?
It seems nonsensical to me to have a party claim that a second party is a public figure, and it then being up to said 2nd party to prove they aren't. How do you prove a negative? Surely the claiming party would have to prove that the 2nd party is a public figure?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newsweek should be held up to ridicule on this
The less the American media bothers to investigate and report real scandals, the harder they should be slapped for sloppy work that serves no point other than to serve up some mild titillation to their geekier readers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The first time.
However, Newsweek ran with the story again, making the situation more complicated than it is for Nakamoto, who probably was thankful the publicity finally waned and the public took away knowing he wasn't the creator.
I'm disappointed Techdirt is only taking pity on the guy, when they've released a "dirt" article on how pathetic CBS for pushing a person who is actively lying about their life story.
If there's going to be a push against CBS for this crap, then there should be a push against Newsweek for doing the exact same thing, only this time, without a willing participant.
I don't expect Newsweek to "lose by paying millions", but it should, on the front page, publicly apologize for screwing with this individual based on "facts".
Imagine, just for a second, if "Bitcoin" was replaced with "pedophile".
Would the position Newsweek has still be justified?
Highly doubt it, and this is no different.
Newsweek failed Nakamoto and the public. They should be forced to own up to it, and it seems this is only possible through the court proceedings potentially about to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, about that old-school math
Would this be a good time to point out that Moore's Law IS exponential?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yeah, about that old-school math
Also, two spaces after a period. Forever. Even though I know it's going to be "corrected" in this comment. (And furthermore, sentence fragments. Verbs overrated.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One thing is for sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sure, but just because you're angry and it sucks, it doesn't mean there's a legal remedy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm sensing more than a little ulterior motive in all this. It's a little surprising that TD itself hasn't picked up on this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also, thank you bitcoin community for supporting the guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]