Lawyer Says It's Copyright Infringement To Use Her Own Blog Posts Against Her In Disciplinary Proceedings
from the court-says-hahahahahahah dept
Eugene Volokh points our attention to yet another bizarre copyright case, Denison v. Larkin, in which lawyer Joanne Denison argued that the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) infringed on her copyrights by using portions of her own blog as evidence against her during a disciplinary proceeding. Not surprisingly, the court soundly rejected this particular interpretation of copyright law.Basically, Denison created a blog about what she and some others believed was "courtroom corruption" concerning a particular 90-year-old woman. Some of those involved in the story filed a disciplinary complaint against Denison, "alleging professional misconduct in making false statements on her Blog." The complaint itself included "15 paragraphs of text" from the blog. Further, she claims that the IARDC "copied over 1,000 pages of the Blog and 'then incorporated [it] into further exhibits.'" She also sued Nextpoint, a company that the IARDC apparently used to save copies of the blog. The (rather patient) court goes through a full fair use analysis, finding (rather easily) that all four of the traditional "fair use factors" weigh heavily in favor of fair use. Based on that, it finds no direct infringement -- and without any direct infringement, the claims of contributory and vicarious infringement fail as well.
Amusingly, Denison tried to argue that the "commercial use" fair use factor weighed in her favor because "the IARDC sells its decisions to companies such as Lexis Nexis and Westlaw for paid or unpaid benefits." The court rather simply points out: "This statement is unfounded."
In the end, it was an easy fair use win (and those are always handy), though this case appeared to be absurd from the start. So it's great to see the court make quick work of it without causing any trouble to fair use.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, disciplinary proceedings, discipline, fair use, illinois, joanne denison
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"...infringed on her copyrights..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weaponright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strip them of their licenses; thereby help prevent their causing further damage -- whether to an undeserving "adversary" or their own potential future clients.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What matters is that this was an easy win
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright is broken.
It has become this amazing tool for many uses other than what was intended. As they kept expanding it to appease some interests they have created something ripe for abuse, and now it is coming home to roost.
How much more abuse has to happen before there can be serious reform of a law that was supposed to give us more, and is constantly used to give us less for the sake of the bottom line?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's more truthful to say "Mike Masnick just hates it when copyright law is abused".
You need to stop lying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facts in the case of Mary G. Sykes ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if the accused created the confession they have copyright over it and if they're being tried in East texas, the judges will rubber-stamp a vast amount of compensation for using it....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
copyright infringement case
[ link to this | view in chronology ]