Congress Wants To Push Dangerous Cybersecurity Bill After The Election, Says US Economy Depends On It
from the bad-ideas dept
Reports are coming out that Congress is looking to push forward with bad cybersecurity legislation after the election, but before the new Congress takes over in January. We've discussed the bill in question, CISA, before. The main idea behind it is to immunize companies from liability if they share certain information with the government. Supporters of the bill note that the information sharing is entirely voluntary, but by taking away the liability it also makes it a lot more likely that companies will choose to give information to the government, and it's not yet clear why the government really needs that information. But the FUD levels are high, with Senator Saxby Chambliss actually suggesting the entire economy is at stake here:"If we wait another year, we are really risking the economy of the United States."Oh, come on. People have been saying this for years -- along with the whole "cyber pearl harbor" claims -- but have failed to present any explanation or details of how (1) there's a real risk to the economy or (2) how current laws block necessary solutions. On top of that, no one seems willing to explain how further information sharing will actually help stop online attacks. Remember, this is the same federal government that didn't even notice that the White House's own network had been breached until some other country told us about it. And yet, we now believe that if only US companies were feeding more information to the NSA that they'd magically be able to stop attacks (and save the economy?). That seems unlikely.
It also sounds like there may be some sort of potential trade-off, in which Congress will try to lump this bill with the USA Freedom Act, as the White House is said to be focused on surveillance reform over the cybersecurity bill. But, the reality is that the two are in many ways attached. And there are increasing worries that the final result on the USA Freedom Act will, in some ways, actually (yet again) enhance the NSA, rather than hold it back. Combine that with a cybersecurity bill that will give the NSA even more ways to get our data, and the end result could be the surveillance state increasing, rather than shrinking, with no actual benefit to the American public. There would be fewer privacy protections and just some arm waving about saving the US economy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cisa, cispa, cybersecurity, economy, fud, nsa, saxby chambliss, sharing, surveillance, usa freedom act
Reader Comments
The First Word
“One good way to avoid a "cyber Pearl Harbor"
Stop building extremely attractive targets which centralize vast amounts of personal data covering hundreds of millions of people.Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Power Corrupts
In exactly the same way as events happening entirely overseas to local stubbed toes relate to "National Security"!
The real question is how does one expect those in power to achieve absolute power unless there is wholesale capitulation of everyone except those in power?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You mean like when you were part of letting the entire Government shut down and try to default on its obligations to prove you had the biggest balls?
I do not think you understand the economy, and the actions of Congress sorta prove none of you do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
/sarc
[ link to this | view in thread ]
One good way to avoid a "cyber Pearl Harbor"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There is nothing that will ever be a 'cyber pearl harbor' and if it was to occur it would likely be created by our own government ah-la Stuxnet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Two things that confuse me about CISA
2. The passage of this would reduce trust in companies even further (as if that's possible), since it just calls out and makes public the fact that companies are spying on you for the government. This seems like something companies wouldn't want to have happen, since they really need to find ways to increase trust instead (preferably by becoming more trustworthy).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A bill so bad, that it would cause issues with voting...
If that does happen, then we the people should start a class action lawsuit against the current house of congress and senate as well as PotUS for the irreparable harm that this law would cause.
These are < 500 people messing with the livelihood of the entire Country, somebody needs to knock some sense into what appears to be a house full of mentally deficient, slow witted, can't pass the A.S.V.A.B. military rejects.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As opposed to risking the economy by continuing the same questionable practices that you demonized China for?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They tell the truth
Private enterprise relies on fair laws and trust to flourish.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Power Corrupts
THEY are the ones compromising communication lines ALL OVER THE GLOBE..
THEY are the ones inserting backdoors and hiding zero days...
THEY are the ones hacking into SOVEREIGN countries systems...
THEY are the ones inserting malware and spyware...
THEY are the ones disabling and sabotaging individuals communications/computer systems...
THEY are the ones who are BY FAR engaging in all the nasty, illegal, immoral, unconstitutional actions, BUT EVERY ONE ELSE IS TO BLAME...
shit's getting real now: sociopathy devolving into outright psychopathy...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We Get What We Fail to Prevent from Being Elected
Saxby Chambliss is leaving office - unfortunately, voluntarily. I don't believe he's really intentionally evil in any major way (a little greedy and corruptible, maybe); I think he's merely representative of the voting majority of his constituents, i.e., ignorant, intellectually lazy, prejudiced, jingoistic, and Christian fundamentalistically anti-science.
Before celebrating Chambliss' exit, note that David Perdue, the wannabe Republican replacement for Chambliss' seat is worse; in addition to all of Saxby's "virtues," Perdue has more than once during his campaign blatantly, publicly lied about his Democratic opponent. So, unlike Chambliss, I believe Perdue is actively evil and foolishly, stupidly dishonest.
Reminds me that things can always get worse. We gotta try harder.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They mean the 1% may lose out on having 75% of the worlds wealth instead only 50%...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
US depends on it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Next to death and taxes, the one thing we can count on in a 'democracy' is that underhanded things will take place right after elections. The people leaving Congress will be trying one last time to prove their loyalty to their future employers on the other side of the revolving door. The people just reelected know that the voting public has a short memory, so it's time to push through those unpopular things they'd been putting off until after the election.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
...
Oh, right, they have tried to ram this crap through before, several times at that, and it's been stopped before because it's complete crap, and their defenses of just why it's needed are nothing more than lies and misleading statements.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Get real
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Suckers!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
FIFY, Senator!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FTFY. You know, truth in reporting and all that. ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]