MPAA Boss Chris Dodd Talks About Sony Hack & Free Speech... Ignoring How It Revealed MPAA's Plan To Undermine Free Speech
from the wanna-run-that-one-by-me-again? dept
Variety has an amusing interview with former Senator and current MPAA boss Chris Dodd, in which he admits that he should have been "more vocal" in speaking out against the Sony Hack -- which he argues was "an attack on free speech."“This happened to a member of our family,” said Dodd. “This was an attack on free speech and private property and as the head of the MPAA, I should have been more vocal.”First of all, I'm not quite clear on how the Sony Hack was really an "attack on free speech" unless you really believe the point of the hack was to get Sony to not show The Interview (a storyline that only showed up well after the hack). But, considering that some of the only real news to come out of the hack was an elaborate mulit-pronged strategy by the MPAA to censor the internet by twisting various laws, that statement is kind of ridiculous.
But even more ridiculous was Dodd's followup, when asked about the Charlie Hebdo attacks:
“If you said to me, what’s the one thing that has been responsible for the 100 years of success of the American film industry, I’d point to one thing — it’s freedom of speech,” said Dodd. “We have always been a great advocate for freedom of expression and speech, and I don’t represent anybody who doesn’t embrace that value.”Sure, freedom of speech for movies. But, on the internet? Not so much. The MPAA has been viciously attacking the internet at every chance, seeking any opportunity to build a filtered internet that blocks out sites and innovation that it doesn't like, or which challenge its legacy business model. The fact that the Sony Hack directly showed the MPAA itself plotting to censor the internet really makes this statement look absolutely ridiculous. It's the same "I strongly support freedom of speech... for the kind of speech I like" bullshit that we now see coming out of other places as well.
The thing is, I actually do believe that Chris Dodd strongly supports free speech and is against filters and censorship. Back when he was still a Senator and was trying to run for President, he actually gave a talk at Google and chastised the company for not standing up enough to those who sought to censor the internet. That speech is worth watching. In it, he tells Google to take a more principled stand against China's attempt to censor the internet with full site blocking or in requiring Google to block access to certain sites. As he said then:
Tell the Chinese government that Google.cn will no longer censor information with Google's consent. And should the Chinese government not find that acceptable, then Google.cn would shut down its operations. I understand that you've already moved all of your search records out of China, to prevent them from being turned over to the Chinese government. But what better way to affirm Google's commitment to the free flow of information as a human right, than to send this message to a nation with the largest population in the world?And yet, now, his own MPAA is pushing Google to do exactly the same thing that China has done.
Oh, one other statement from that same speech that Dodd might want to remember:
One way we respond to change, in my view, is to stand up, and to stand up for our principles, which do not change.If only that were true in his case, too.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chris dodd, free speech, sony hack
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[Irony-O-Meter at 300%, cooling system at highest capacity]
“We have always been a great advocate for freedom of expression"
[Irony-O-Meter at 450%, cooling system failing!]
"and speech,"
[Irony-O-Meter at 550%, cooling system failing, Prenda Buffers overflowing!]
" and I don’t represent anybody who doesn’t embrace that value.”
[BOOOOOM!]
Dang it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Please, think of the ironies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ask yourself why... Democracy in the West ironically died with the fall of the Berlin Wall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
content, including pirated content is speech.
Any plan that would effectively eliminate piracy would be capable of mass censorship because it must be able to block files of arbitrary content.
So if the MPAA wins against piracy so too do China like regimes win against their own people because such tools wouldn't care about the difference between copyrighted goods and dissident speech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Piracy" (copyright infringement), again in this worldview, is illegitimate content; it's evidence of stolen goods. You can't have a "free speech" argument on stolen property, right? Therefore there's no mental conflict; movies can say whatever they want, but if the internet has to be locked down to prevent copyright infringement, that's no problem...they're just preventing mass theft.
It's a worldview that unravels at the slightest logical thought, but it never needs to be taken that far. Spout bull**** long enough and loud enough and it will become the "truth" (citation: see organized religion).
But if you look at the world with that lens this makes "sense." It's somewhat akin to wearing a blindfold at noon and proudly declaring that it's night, but hey, I guess that makes sense when you purposely ignore reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free expression in movies [was Re: ]
There's some legal history here that people ought to remember.
Burstyn v Wilson (1952)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I agree with this. The problem I have with the like of the MPAA is that what they are trying to do also restricts the legitimate noninfringing speech of others.
What Dodd is actually saying is that Hollywood is a staunch defender of their free speech rights. He leaves unsaid the fact that Hollywood has long been antagonistic to everyone else's free speech rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Back in the years when Senator Chris Dodd was criticising Google for buckling to pressure to censor the internet, he was also publicly critising his fellow elected officials for becoming lobbyists, which was something Chris Dodd repeatedly vowed he would never do.
That is, until he took a multi-million dollar job to became the head of the MPAA, one of the biggest lobbying organization in the country.
Any Techdirt story about Chris Dodd needs to include a few links to remind people of this guy's utter sliminess, like this past Techdirt article that drew 342 comments:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120120/14472117492/mpaa-directly-publicly-threatens-pol iticians-who-arent-corrupt-enough-to-stay-bought.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While "mullet" (British derogatory slang for bonehead, among others) sounds apropos of many of Dodd's babblings, I suspect this was intended to be multi-pronged.
I find it hard to believe anyone takes this idiot seriously, at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and the ever popular it's not a crime when we/I do it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buuuuuuuuuuullshit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]