Techdirt Podcast Episode 9: Is Muni Broadband A Monopoly Killer Or A Killer Monopoly?
from the the-debate-rages-on dept
Just this morning we wrote about a newly proposed bill that would stop states from blocking municipal broadband. This comes just a few weeks after President Obama similarly proposed having the FCC pre-empt state efforts to block cities from offering up their own broadband service. Muni broadband is often seen as a way to fight oligopolistic control of the broadband market by letting local communities offer another competitor (and often better, cheaper service). Critics, however, argue that local governments shouldn't be competing with private companies, and we shouldn't have governments getting into the broadband space at all. At the same time, they worry about the federal government stepping in to block states from making their own laws (though they don't seem to express similar concern about states blocking municipalities from making their own decisions). This week on the Techdirt podcast, we discuss municipal broadband and whether it's good government interference in the market, adding competition against incumbent legacy providers, or bad government interference in the market.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, muni broadband, municipal broadband
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Legalities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A good question is why fiber-optic lines are not automatically thought of as public infrastructure in the same way that roads and bridges are. And like roads and bridges, once lines are laid down, traffic should be open to any company that wants to do business over those optical lines, whether it's providing internet service, 'cable' TV, telephone service, or anything else. That would be far better than granting one company a complete monopoly over those lines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The function of the government is to act as the servant of the people. When it doesn't serve us, it fails us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Competition, why not?
Why shouldn't I be able to group up with some other people with the aim of providing ourselves our own infrastructure? That's free market. Banning people from competing is not. If a company comes in and can offer better services, well good for them and for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Telephone poles and Google concessions
As for Google's arrangements with cities, I always hear people talking about them in the abstract, nothing in the specific. From what I can tell, they aren't that outlandish though some of them I think are difficult tradeoffs, like letting Google refuse to serve some areas of town where demand is low. That is a tradeoff that is worth discussing. But Kansas City and others have said they will give those same deals to others. The trick is just that TWC, Comcast, AT&T, etc refuse to invest in that level of service.
I'm not saying every local government has its act together on these matters. But the vast majority are doing what they can to encourage deployment. The big carriers previously claimed that statewide franchising was retarding investment so half the states eliminated it - but saw no change in investment patterns.
If you want to encourage competition, you should studiously ignore suggestions from the biggest carriers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you for the interesting thoughts! Right now I believe people can do even more with this information. Even project like https://xn--lck0a4d411qemf.jp/%e3%82%aa%e3%83%b3%e3%83%a9%e3%82%a4%e3%83%b3%e3%82%ab%e3%82%b8%e3%83% 8eroyal-vegas%e3%83%ad%e3%82%a4%e3%83%a4%e3%83%ab%e3%83%99%e3%82%ac%e3%82%b9/ can make a huge benefits from this. I hope to see more updates.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]