Former Prenda Lawyer Hit With A $50,000 Counterclaim In ADA Shakedown Lawsuit
from the trolling-for-ADA-dollars dept
Late in 2013, Paul Hansmeier, formerly of Prenda Law's Legal Buffoonery on Wheels Copyright Death Suicide Squad, realized that participating in a multi-jurisdictional legal train wreck had left him oddly unfulfilled. If the promise contained in his law degree was ever to be fulfilled, he would need to reassess his shakedown-focused lawyering.
After an indeterminable amount of thought, Hansmeier apparently arrived at the conclusion that -- unfulfilled promise or no -- he was really only good at one thing: shaking people down. And, sadly, he wasn't even all that great at that. But "sue what you know," as they say, and Hansmeier went about rebranding himself as a Champion of the Weak and Underprivileged.
No longer would he be throwing shaky demand letters and even shakier lawsuits at Household Members Voted Most Likely To Download Porn by the loose confederation of shakedown artists d/b/a An Actual Law Firm ("Come see our letterhead!"). That was the old Paul Hansmeier.
The new Paul Hansmeier would instead be throwing shaky lawsuits and demand letters at any company whose towel racks were located more than 32" above the ground or whose entry threshold was a ¼" above the legally-mandated height. The smaller the company the better, as they rarely even bothered to show up in court and would instead settle for a small fee.
The new Paul Hansmeier's operations were so efficient he could barely keep himself stocked in A4. Filings were submitted so fast not even the plaintiffs were aware they were listed as plaintiffs. And it was working, to a limited extent. Hansmeier was able to knock over a few mom-and-pop businesses for a few grand each. But now he's run into Kahler Hotels, which not only isn't interested in his ADA shakedown claims, but is countersuing him for $50,000+. (h/t to Dan Browning of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune)
In its response to Hansmeier's complaint, Kahler denies a majority of the allegations before moving on to its own complaints.
COUNT I - ABUSE OF PROCESSWhether or not the counterclaims (which are really, really vague) hold up remains to be seen, but this motion should give Hansmeier second thoughts about trolling this particular venue for easy ADA cash.
1. Defendants are owners of real property located in Rochester, Minnesota.
2. Plaintiffs filed and served the instant action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and unfair discrimination.
3. Plaintiffs have an ulterior purpose in pursuing the claims set forth in their Complaint.
4. Plaintiffs’ Complaint misuses and perverts the purpose of a civil action.
5. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiffs’ abuse of process, Defendants have sustained damages in excess of $50,000.
COUNT II - CIVIL CONSPIRACY
6. Defendants incorporate in this paragraph the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 5 as though they were fully set forth herein.
7. The Plaintiffs are engaged in a civil conspiracy to accomplish some concerted action, which injures Defendants.
8. The Plaintiffs did commit, and executed certain acts in pursuance of certain torts as previously delineated against the Defendants.
9. That as a result of the Plaintiffs’ tortious conduct alleged herein, Plaintiffs did conspire and agree to commit such acts.
10. As a direct and proximate result thereof, Defendants have sustained damages in excess of $50,000.
WHEREFORE, Defendants pray for entry of judgment as follows:
1. Plaintiffs take nothing by their Complaint as alleged;
2. Defendants are awarded damages in excess of $50,000 together with interest, costs, disbursements and attorney’s fees; and
3. The court order such further relief as it deems just and equitable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: abuse of process, ada, ada trolling, americans with disabilities, paul hansmeier, shakedown, trolling
Companies: disability support alliance, kahler hotels, prenda
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like Will Ferrell or Jeff Goldblum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://madisonrecord.com/news/269464-guava-attorneys-duffy-and-steele-categorically-deny -sanctionable-conduct
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's say I'm a lawyer. If I showed up in court and said "I'm here on behalf of Initrode Inc., to bring suit against Contoso Inc. for violating X, Y, and Z," and then someone from Initrode showed up and said "hey, that guy's not our lawyer and he never was," wouldn't that be a real good way to get myself into some real serious trouble?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
David P. Meyer & Associates and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro show us how it's done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I only know what A4 is because of printer settings. I'm guessing Hansmeier doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I suppose that it does check the box of filing a counterclaim, preventing the case from being unilaterally dismissed with the threat of refiling still existing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Steele
John Steele is about to start the same line of "business" in Chicago. He setup a firm "The Accessibility Law Group" and solicits disabled people to become instruments in his get-rich-quick scheme. The website clearly violates the IARDC Rule 7.2(c).
I already tipped Steele that Old Neighborhood Italian American Club doesn't have proper wheelchair access. You may want to add your two cents too.
Duffy is rumored to be involved in The Accessibility Law Group too: this information is currently being verified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: John Steele
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As a result, when someone like Hansmeier pokes at them the response is swift and sure. Stomp on the roach hard; the word will get around.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After All, Turnabout's Fair Play
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do lawyers have some exemption when it comes to breaking laws?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is being done with the law is a travesty, but sadly it is all perfectly "legal"... which means we need to fix the damn laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My brother got sued by this unscrupulous attorney
An attorney offered to help but she wants 10's of thousands of $! My brother and his wife are minority immigrants that came to the US 18 years ago and they have been working 12 hour days to make ends meet, and make this store successful. Paying an attorney 10K or Hansmeier settlement may put them out of business.
Any advice?
Thank you!, Alfred!
alfred.normandy@gmail.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]