Our Response To Sony Sending Us A Threat Letter For Reporting On The Company's Leaked Emails

from the go-pound-sand dept

Tue, Apr 21st 2015 10:33am — Mike Masnick

Yesterday we wrote about how Sony's high-powered lawyer on retainer, David Boies, had apparently been sending major media properties an idiotic letter warning them not to report on the leaked Sony hack emails. And then, what did we find in our mail on Monday afternoon? A copy of the same damn letter of our very own. How thoughtful of David Boies to send us a personally signed copy. I've asked my staff to frame it and hang it on the wall. I hope that he's charging Sony top dollar to send us a letter we'd already mocked as ridiculous, wrong on the law and pointless.

Anyway, given that we've now personally received our own copy, I feel semi-obligated to respond -- and to respond in public.

So, David, Leah and Sony Corp. -- our official response is: go pound sand.

Here's the really astounding thing: In December, Sony tried to turn this whole story into how the hack itself was an attack on free speech. It never was. Even if you believe the (incredibly dubious) story line that North Korea hacked Sony to try to prevent the company from showing a comedy about North Korea, the only "attack" on free speech came when Sony's top execs actually folded and originally agreed to not release the flick. It was only after being widely mocked that Sony worked out alternative plans and then tried to wrap itself in the flag and proclaim itself a true beacon of free speech.

But to take that "we're the bastions of free speech" and immediately turn it around and effectively threaten the media for reporting on newsworthy leaked content -- something that is quite clearly protected by the First Amendment and with some pretty high-profile case law backing that up -- just demonstrates how little Sony actually believes in free speech. Sony "supports" free speech when it's useful to make the company look good and then is willing to throw around a bunch of expensive legal FUD to try to intimidate the press, when actual free speech can be used to embarrass Sony.

Yes, it sucks for Sony that its emails were hacked. It would suck for just about any company, I'm sure. But that doesn't change the fact that the media has every legal right to report on those emails if they find it newsworthy. Threatening the media is not just counterproductive, it makes Sony look incredibly clueless and thin-skinned while at the same time just adding more life to the story itself.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: david boies, first amendment, free speech, journalism, reporting, threats
Companies: sony

59 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Violynne (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 9:30am

go pound sand
I get the "go" part, but "pound" doesn't rhyme with "buck" and "sand" isn't a synonym for "yourself".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 10:44am

Sony "supports" free speech when it's useful to make the company look good

Sony supports free speech when they can charge for it.

As with Violynne, I was expecting something closer to the Private Eye reply, "We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.":

"We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell. We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:35am
  
  Re:
  No, Sony supports free speech that they agree with. Everything else is somehow bad.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 10:52am

no you should have referred them to "Arkell v. Pressdram"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Miles Barnett (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:08pm
  
  Re:
  That was the first thing that came to my mind. I'm glad I read sites like Techdirt so I know about such things.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 10:55am

Cant wait to see the response of Sony corp with this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:28am
  
  Re:
  Don't hold your breath. They probably won't respond.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Kaemaril (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:01pm
  
  Re:
  If they have any sense there will be no response, and they'll just quietly go about their business.
  
  If they try to double-down ... whoo boy, that's going to be fun watching Boise excoriated.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dr. Mom (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:30pm
    
    Re: Re:
    They will double down. They ban people from forums for criticizing their moderation.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve Swafford (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 10:55am

Go Pound Sand.
I love this very much. Thank you for all you do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That One Other Not So Random Guy, 21 Apr 2015 @ 10:59am

Sony... meet Streisand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:04am
  
  Re:
  I think they have met before.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:36am
    
    Re: Re:
    Sony tried to look up that reference, but a rootkit on their server had deleted it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Danielle, 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:27pm
  
  Re: Meet Barbra
  They already know her. She's signed with Columbia Records, which they own. However it seems they have learned nothing from that relationship
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:04am

btw, No actual proof was ever presented that is was North Korea. Just the US government's "determination". After the last two years of Snowden leaks no one can accept anything the Gov says anymore. Proof or GTFO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jupiterkansas (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:20pm
  
  Re:
  All that really matters is that a majority of people believe it was North Korea. That's how FUD works. The truth is irrelevant.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Bonny, 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:40pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "All that really matters is that a majority of people believe it was North Korea. That's how FUD works. The truth is irrelevant."
    
    It's how it worked in the 20th century.
    
    In a few years, after legacy media has fully died off, only officials will believe anything coming from official corporate-state sources. The internet is forcing transparency and accountability on government. That is why the dinosaurs are trying so hard to cripple it. But the stench of corruption is already overwhelming. We own information now.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - jupiterkansas (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:47pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      We own disinformation too, and so do they. It just means they will be more sophisticated.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Joe K, 21 Apr 2015 @ 4:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        jupiterkansas quoth:
        We own disinformation too, and so do they. It just means they will be more sophisticated.
        
        Sony... sophisticated.
        A category error, that one.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        jupiterkansas (profile), 22 Apr 2015 @ 8:30am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I was referring to the government's FUD, not Sony's.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
JoeT, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:13am

Arkell v. Pressdram?
I believe a slightly better reply would be:

"We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram"

For those with limited patience, Pressdram is the company that publishes the British satirical magazine "Private Eye". They often have controversial content. A Mr. Arkell was insulted at one point by one of their articles, and had his lawyer send a nasty letter. The reply was thus:

"We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell. We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- JoeT, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:18am
  
  Re: Arkell v. Pressdram?
  And I see that I am far too slow at looking things up, and that anonymous coward made the second comment on exactly this point. As did the anonymous coward for the third comment.
  
  Lose for me. Win for anonymous coward. And anonymous coward.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spaceman Spiff (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:18am

Pounding sand
Given that Boies seems to have a head full of sand, you could pound his head for the same effect. Sony deserves all the bad press that it is certainly going to get as these messages are released into the wild. Returning to the sand metaphor, they are going to be hit with a real sand storm!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Designerfx (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:30am
  
  Re: Pounding sand
  Here's the thing. Boies is clearly in this for $$. They have done great things in the past too, such as defend Novell vs Microsoft in other cases.
  
  Was it just a fluke that doing so was the one time they were remotely ethical/not garbage?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Miles Barnett (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:13pm
    
    Re: Re: Pounding sand
    Remember also that Boies' firm was the one that litigated the SCO vs Linux (technically IBM) case. He's done plenty of bad stuff along with the good.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - jupiterkansas (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:26pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Pounding sand
      And a great attack of Prop 8. But the guy's for hire and Sony's paying big bucks.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:38pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Pounding sand
      Please remember Bois, Schiller, and Flexner LLP are Lawyers. Their business is representing clients in matters of law. To a great extent, they are thus mercenaries, the same as the plumber, the exterminator, or electrician are.
      
      In an event such as this, their job isn't so much to write the letter so much as to make sure that their client does not overstate the law. Client says, "write a letter that says X, Y, and Z", lawyer says "OK, but if it comes from us, it can't say Y because that's not the law." Note that the letter a) is a plea, and b) does not promise a lawsuit that B.S.F know would not stand the sniff test.
      
      They're on retainer, so it's either send a letter out as Sony directs (subject to B.S.F. review for legality), or quit the retainer for nonperformance.
      
      And yes, it is slimy that they refer to the CFAA as if it might somehow apply to the letter recipient, but they carefully avoid saying directly that they would sue based on it. Still, if B.S.F gets in trouble over the letter, that is the part that would be pointed at. "Shame if anything happened to your router, you might want to buy our router insurance..."
      
      Not a high point in their career, but I give them marks for holding Sony away from potential declaratory judgement suits (by not demanding specific actions under the laws they quoted earlier).
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - DannyB (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:45pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Pounding sand
        I think you get it wrong.
        
        BSF's job is to write a letter, no matter how wildly untrue that is not outside the bounds of what the law will allow them to get away with.
        
        That is quite a different thing that writing a letter that is strictly about what the law allows.
        
        If you don't understand this, then see BSF's work in SCO vs. IBM on Groklaw.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dan T., 21 Apr 2015 @ 1:20pm
    
    Boies
    He's also one of the two lawyers (on opposite sides of the political spectrum, and opponents in the Bush v. Gore case) who teamed up to defeat California's Proposition 8 (thus bringing marriage equality to that state and paving the way for the upcoming Supreme Court ruling that may bring it to all 50 states).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:30am

So you want Sony, do listen to Darude's Sandstorm? Cool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mark Wing, 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:04pm

Unlike pure evil companies such as Comcast or Verizon, Sony has actually had some good products and brief stints of innovation in the past. They used to make good electronics and they had a brand loyalty, and their name meant something.

So it's extra sad when companies that used to be great like Sony, Craftsman, Oakley, etc., turn to complete shit in the name of short term profits and throw millions of their previously-loyal customers under the bus.

And some of these companies aren't satisfied with just turning to shit--they turn into jerks. Nothing invokes brand loyalty like cease and desist letters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:11pm
  
  Re:
  You must be really old to remember when Sony was a good company. I started boycotting Sony in the early 90s and I've heard of others that claim Sony was only riding on their name is the 70's or 80's.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:49pm
  
  Re:
  The end was inevitable when they merged with Universal.
  
  The insanity is under such high pressure that it is not possible for sanity to filter in, but rather the insanity filters out into the rest of the entire organization.
  
  There was a recent TD about the MPAA wanting to fix it's reputation. They have irrevocably tainted Sony's name. I would never buy a Sony product.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dr. Mom (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:48pm
  
  Re:
  You know nothing about their online entertainment division then.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Peter (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:11pm

The letter is pretty broad ...
... perhaps Mr Boies could confirm that certain documents - such as the ones talking about influencing the Scottish referendum, bribing officials to put pressure on Google or using other illegal tactics to Sony's benefit - are indeed genuine and written by Sony before you delete them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:19pm

hey sony
hows the walkman doing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whoever, 21 Apr 2015 @ 12:40pm

Arkell v. Pressdram
Refer them to the reply given in Arkell v. Pressdram.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 1:17pm

You know what's really funny? That there isn't any correspondence emails between Google and Sony revealed from the hack. Why, if someone was thinking conspiracy, they'd say that Google was behind the Sony hack and made sure none of their emails were released. Y'know, if you were conspiratorial minded...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich Fiscus (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 1:56pm

In other news, due to a bad translation of the first rule of holes, Sony has announced plans to open a shovel factory.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dr. Mom (profile), 21 Apr 2015 @ 2:54pm

SoE, now Daybreak Games
Sony employees have a LONG, sordid history of suppressing free speech every chance they get. They even do it to people who pay for their shitty service!

People are abandoning their facist forums.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ryuugami, 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:42pm

Je suis Sony?
But to take that "we're the bastions of free speech" and immediately turn it around

So, what you're saying is, Sony is France.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe K, 21 Apr 2015 @ 4:00pm
  
  Re: Je suis Sony?
  So, what you're saying is, Sony is France.
  
  Nailed it.
  Three quenelles for Sony!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 3:52pm

Sony....author of the Zero Dark Thirty Propaganda movie..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 4:48pm

Counsel actually wrote a restrained letter that solicited cooperation. The response here would have been wise to follow its lead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 6:01pm
  
  Re:
  Go pound sand, Slonecker.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 22 Apr 2015 @ 12:37am
  
  Re:
  If someone asked me to do something that my past actions made clear was both against my stated position, and against my best interests, my response would probably not be that polite either. As such, 'Go pound sand' is seems to be remarkably restrained on TD's part.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
  
  Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2015 @ 4:43am
  
  Re:
  Don't you have to suck off out_of_the_blue or something, you big man-child?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2015 @ 11:31pm

"Even if you believe the (incredibly dubious) story line that North Korea hacked Sony to try to prevent the company from showing a comedy about North Korea"

Timothy Geigner didn't think it was "incredibly dubious." (Nor did the Obama government, at least publicly).

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141202/03470929291/that-huge-sony-hack-may-have-been-n orth-korea-retaliating-against-james-franco-seth-rogen.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 22 Apr 2015 @ 8:07am
  
  Re:
  But most people (at least in the computer security biz) do consider it very dubious, but possible. The Obama administration's opinion has little weight, since they have offered no evidence to support it and having that opinion serves a political nee.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
rade, 22 Apr 2015 @ 11:18am

Sony , one and only ....
Stop being cowards and stop saying SONY DID THIS, SONY DID THAT !!! Stop embarrassing company as a whole !!! Start using names of those who wrote emails to you -journalists !!
ITS NOT SONY ITSELF , A JAPANESE COMPANY OF GREAT HERITAGE AND RESPECT , ITS AMERICAN PEOPLE WORKING AT SONY THAT DID THIS !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2015 @ 11:41am
  
  Re: Sony , one and only ....
  For the sake of accuracy, the party represented by the attorney who wrote the letter is Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., a US corporation headquartered in Culver City, CA.
  
  By using just the name Sony the author creates unnecessary confusion and lumps together a family of separate and distinct companies that are scattered throughout the world and operate across a wide diversity of industries far removed from motion pictures.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Joe K, 22 Apr 2015 @ 4:54pm
    
    Re: Re: Sony , one and only ....
    The devil is indeed in the details. And so, for the sake of completeness...
    
    What is Sony Pictures Entertainment?
    
    Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. (SPE) is the American entertainment subsidiary of Japanese multinational technology and media conglomerate Sony.
    
    Based in Culver City, California, it encompasses Sony's motion picture, television production and distribution units.
    
    So there's that.
    
    Also, there's the Sony rootkit scandal, in which Sony BMG covertly installed rootkits on its paying customers' machines, via 22 million legally purchased music CDs.
    
    And what is Sony BMG?
    
    Sony BMG Music Entertainment was a record music company, which was a 50–50 joint venture between the Sony Corporation of America and Bertelsmann AG. The venture's successor, the again-active Sony Music Entertainment, is 100% owned by the Sony Corporation of America.
    
    Happy now? Or should we dig some more details?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2015 @ 5:59pm
    
    Re: Re: Sony , one and only ....
    And? That's supposed to somehow alleviate what SPE has done? I seem to recall that when the PSN in the US got hacked way back when, the Japanese in charge made a public apology. Like it or not, Sony is Sony.
    
    So is there a point you're trying to make or are you unhappy that you get to pound sand?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
rade, 22 Apr 2015 @ 11:35am

Sony , one and only
If you didn't understand ,I ll explain
John Smith CEO of (this and that ) did this - (NOT SONY)
Anna Smith director of( this and that ) threaten us (NOT SONY)
So ,now it seems Sony is the only one to blame for everything that is wrong in politics and economy and every other company is innocent like baby ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe K, 22 Apr 2015 @ 5:17pm
  
  Re: Sony , one and only
  If you didn't understand ,I ll explain
  John Smith CEO of (this and that ) did this - (NOT SONY)
  Anna Smith director of( this and that ) threaten us (NOT SONY)
  
  "But officer, you don't understand. I wasn't speeding. It was my right foot that was depressing the gas pedal, not me."
  
  So, now it seems Sony is the only one to blame for everything that is wrong in politics and economy and every other company is innocent like baby ...
  
  Um, did not SPE's lawyers send the letter that is the OP's topic?
  
  And, speaking of "every other company", just about every major Hollywood studio is implicated by the emails which SPE's threatening letter is attempting to suppress discussion of. For example, check out the recipient list of this email in Wikileaks' searchable archive of the released Sony emails. (I found that one by searching for "goliath", which afaict is their code word for Google.)
  
  So, Sony astroturf fanboy, what's your point?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Joe K, 22 Apr 2015 @ 5:22pm
    
    Re: Re: Sony , one and only
    missing link: Wikileaks' searchable archive of Sony Pictures Entertainment emails
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fraytor, 22 Apr 2015 @ 12:03pm

Please post a link
Please post a direct link to a PDF of the Boise letter. The embedded letter is not showing up for all browsers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe K, 22 Apr 2015 @ 4:14pm
  
  Re: Please post a link
  Please post a direct link to a PDF of the Boise
  letter. The embedded letter is not showing up for all
  browsers.
  
  Here: direct link
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Caoimhin Laochdha (profile), 30 Apr 2015 @ 8:58am

Response to Sony letter
Dear Sony,

"Nuts"

Love, Techdirt

~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
( quoting Gen. McAuliffe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_McAuliffe )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]