President Obama Forgets To Thank Edward Snowden For Surveillance Reform
from the wanna-try-that-again dept
No matter what you think of the passage of the USA Freedom Act, you should be able to agree that it wouldn't have been possible without Edward Snowden's contributions. Even many of the Senators who were against reform are grudgingly admitting this. On the floor of the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell spat out that the USA Freedom Act was a "resounding victory" for Snowden as if it were some sort of insult. The only guy who seemed really confused by all of this was Rep. Pete King who somehow argued that the (very limited) reform bill spelled "defeat for ISIS, Edward Snowden and Rand Paul" which is not only wrong, but nonsensical.
For the past eighteen months, I have called for reforms that better safeguard the privacy and civil liberties of the American people while ensuring our national security officials retain tools important to keeping Americans safe. That is why, today, I welcome the Senate's passage of the USA FREEDOM Act, which I will sign when it reaches my desk.Notably missing from all that? Ed Snowden. Without him, none of this would have happened. And, it's beyond misleading for the President to pretend that he's the one who's been calling for this kind of reform for 18 months. First off, that was only in response to Ed Snowden revealing the program and, second, while some of the key reforms in here needed legislative action, he could have stepped up and done some of it on his own -- something his administration refused to do for 18 months.
After needless delay and inexcusable lapse in important national security authorities, my Administration will work expeditiously to ensure our national security professionals again have the full set of vital tools they need to continue protecting the country. Just as important, enactment of this legislation will strengthen civil liberty safeguards and provide greater public confidence in these programs, including by prohibiting bulk collection through the use of Section 215, FISA pen registers, and National Security Letters and by providing the American people with additional transparency measures.
I am gratified that Congress has finally moved forward with this sensible reform legislation. I particularly applaud Senators Leahy and Lee as well as Representative Goodlatte, Sensenbrenner, Conyers, and Nadler for their leadership and tireless efforts to pass this important bipartisan achievement.
At the very least, you'd hope that the President could acknowledge the simple fact that, like it or not, this entire process was kicked off because of Ed Snowden's actions. Instead, the President's chief spokesperson continues to demonize Snowden:
The fact is that Mr. Snowden committed very serious crimes, and the U.S. government and Department of Justice believe that he should face them. And that’s why we believe that Mr. Snowden should return to the United States where he will face due process, and he’ll have the opportunity -- if he returned to the United States -- to make that case in a court of law. But obviously our view on this is that he committed and is accused of very serious crimes.Doesn't anyone in the White House recognize just how silly it is to claim that it's a "very serious crime" to reveal a program that two separate White House advisory boards, a district court and an appeals court, and multiple Senators aware of the details of the program have said is illegal and/or unconstitutional? And then to celebrate (very mild) reforms that only came about because of those actions, while at the same time calling those actions "very serious crimes"?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: barack obama, ed snowden, patriot act, pete king, section 215, surveillance reform, usa freedom act
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Ed Snowden should return to the US
He should return so that he can be appointed head of the NSA. Why? Because he's the only NSA employee who has told the truth.Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yeah, that would be a sucker bet, wouldn't it.
Anyone who believes this law will limit the NSA's ability to continue collecting "metadata" is fooling themselves.
All this law did was to ensure the information isn't used in cases where "terrorists" are captured, hindered, blocked, killed, etc, etc.
That $3 billion facility would be worthless if they followed the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still have fantasies...
Not that that would ever happen in this reality, no.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The real solution isn't legislative, it's technological. Full, pervasive encryption of all communications is the only thing that can keep the prying eyes out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Actually that is not JUST their history, that is their actual mission purpose, they just do not state it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not silly at all. All the 'thanks' and prises are just lip service. In the end very little changes to an Executive that thinks that it is above the law. As noted before most illegal surveillance programs existed in spite of everything against them (including, lately, the public opinion in general) and they will keep existing under a plethora of creative names from now on. The Executive lied to the Congress (Clapper anyone?) with no punishment; withheld information from the public, the Judiciary and the Legislative; relied on their own personal interpretation of laws; ignored Human Rights that are accepted internationally....... All of it with no real consequence. This Act may be a tiny ant step forward but, really, without consequences for their acts they'll keep ignoring the law and judicial order whenever they see fit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
King: I've spoken to my advisors and we've decided to stop them.
::battle ensues::
King: My subjects, I am happy to announce that we have stopped the rival kingdom's plot and there will be a three day feast to celebrate this victory, at which we will burn the messenger who revealed the plot to us at the stake! Let the revelry begin!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I swear we will never follow the "If I were an evil Overlord" as we should. We might even need to hide it lest they get smart about these things.
Life is Irony... BURNING IRONY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ed Snowden should return to the US
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ed Snowden should return to the US
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA and DoJ should be charged...
Both of them have vested interest in the other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The NSA and DoJ should be charged...
Former president Bush was charged with war crimes, funny how that little tidbit stays off the news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they "re-formed" and legitamised the unconstitutional and illegal survailence meathods, and granted themselves the "freedom" to keep spying.
At what point does the BS get so thick you check your shoes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The MSM lets them get away with it
The only reason these government officials continue to repeat all of these assertions is because the maintstream media eats it up and doesn't bother to call them out on it. If they would all collectively, with one voice, yell "BULLSHIT", these officials would soon learn that it's no longer acceptable to continuously repeat patently absurd statements. They'd have to make up another story.
But, that's not the media we have right now. They are the entity that could keep a lot of this practice in check and they aren't doing their damn job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The MSM lets them get away with it
Phff. The 'mainstream media' has enabled the people in power for years - longer than you've been alive.
The ONLY reason the people know about Ed's documents is because of the ability of the Internet to route around the damage of what you call the MSM.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is what most people in the US believes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Every. Single. Time
Every single time someone makes this claim, people need to respond by pointing out two things:
1. The treatment of previous whistleblowers, both in the court and out of it, by the government.
2. The fact that under the law they would charge him with(Espionage Act), motive is not admissible.
Snowden would absolutely not be allowed to 'make his case', it would come down to 'Did you leak these documents?', and since he clearly has, that would be it, guilty verdict, prison for the rest of his short life.
It would not matter in the slightest why he did what he did, or that his doing so has led to significant debate(despite the government's wishes and efforts otherwise) on the matter, and rulings and investigations finding the NSA's actions both illegal and useless at their stated purpose, no, if they dragged him to court the only thing that would be ruled on is what he did, not why he did it, and they know it.
As such it's high time people, and the press, start calling them out on their blatant lies in pretending he'd get anything even remotely resembling a fair trial or the ability to present his case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Every. Single. Time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Every. Single. Time
However, in this case I imagine it would be a moot point, I highly doubt he'd get a jury trial at all, so there would be no opportunity for such to occur.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Every. Single. Time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New day, same old surveillance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
very carefully worded sentence
Now why would he feel the need to specify those 3 methods? Mr. Obama, would you care to elaborate on the other methods that Congress failed to prohibit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mr. Snowden ruined 'em all & they know it. They have to live it every day they show up in public.
The unmitigated hatred for Mr. Snowden is so intense that the only resolution for the PTB will be his ultimate destruction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Come to my lair
This is telling. He is not a suspect. He is a criminal, already.
"and the U.S. government and Department of Justice believe that he should face them."
Meaning, I guess, "the US government and DoJ will do everything possible to have a court of law rubber-stamp our condemnation."
"And that’s why we believe that Mr. Snowden should return to the United States where he will face due process, and he’ll have the opportunity -- if he returned to the United States -- to make that case in a court of law."
Translation: "given we cannot ourselves be DA, jury, judge, and executioner we will leave the judge part for others."
"But obviously our view on this is that he committed and is accused of very serious crimes."
No matter what, he is going to go down. He *committed* the (rather foggy) crimes. We are also going to accuse him of anything else we can find, just in case.
OK.
Now, let me see if I really understand it:
* he is considered a criminal, not a suspect;
* he is going to be charged of espionage and treason, among many others;
* he will not be able to have a public trial (see Guantanamo trials);
* he will not have access to any documentation collected and used against him (see Guantanamo again);
* he is risking almost certain death as a result.
Now, why the hell would he put himself under the so-called mercy of the government? What am I missing here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another thing, too.
The Guardian did so at considerable risk, to the point where the British government smashed up their computer as to end the leaks..problem was, everyone had the information by that time.
Sometimes the truth is worth every damned risk one takes.
I doubt Mr. Snowden regrets one thing he did, and he probably has had a few laughs about what has transpired since he did it.
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reform= BS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]